KR1245;781729 wrote:I can see both sides of the argument. Lebron made a comment a couple days ago about his current teammates and his teammates in Cleveland. He said that he's enjoying this because he doesnt have to be "the guy" the majority of the time. He can pass it Wade or Bosh and "get out of the way".
Do you think MJ, Bird or Magic would ever make a comment like that? I think thats the point that BR is trying to make. I dont think a true "leader" would do or say that
A true leader doesn't do everything himself. Part of what made Bird and Magic great was their ability to involve everyone and they also had the benefit of having at least one other "great" player to support them. The difference that LeBron is able to see and point out (having someone else he can rely on) is not something that Bird or Magic ever experienced and his former situation is not a circumstance in which Jordan ever won.
For Magic's first two championships, he was the 3rd leading scorer on the team over the whole season. Hell, in Magic's legendary Finals Game 6 his rookie season, Jamaal Wilkes scored 37 pts and had 10 rebounds. It is much easier to focus on your own game when you don't have to feel like you are the only option.
The thing is, the fans are the ones who want LeBron to be something other than what he is. You wanted him to be your "leader", you wanted him to bring
you a championship, etc. The fact that he isn't Jordan or Bird or Magic doesn't make him a failure - as a player or a leader. There is a reason that your point-of-references are the top handful of players EVER. It isn't James going around saying he wants to be better than those guys or trying to make sure he gets in that company - and frankly, if he was saying those things his teammates would have a much greater reason to hate him because he'd be a selfish ass. He said he wants to win championships. And nobody has ever done that alone. I'll bet he's not going to lose any sleep over not being Jordan, Bird, or Magic if he does happen to win multiple titles in Miami.
Right now, before he's won a thing you're already putting him in the all-time great conversation. Does it really matter whether he's 1, 2, 3, or 4 on that list?