muffy;757047 wrote:Sorry wkfan, the course is part of Kilbourne so yes, the bill goes to WCS or Kilbourne Student Council. When I was in high school my school played Shelby in all sports. I was in the band. After our football game ended I walked to the band bus to realize paint was poured all over our buses. It was a warm night, we'd left windows open on the buses. Paint also went inside and ruined personal belongings of several band members. The Shelby HS Student Council had to pay to have our buses repainted. The student council, not the school district. That was fall of '73. I guess in your eyes, restitution shouldn't have had to be made - after all football games provide many great lessons.
Please help me understand how an individual act of vandalism correlates to a school curriculum asking a group to speak?
Of course restitution should have been made.....I just don't know why the actual purpetrators of the damage didn't pay for the damage? Did the Shelby student council members do the damage??? Was it even determined that Shelby HS students did this...and, if they did, why would the student council have been made to pay for it? If you really think about the 'crime'.....you would reach the conclusion that the those who should have been held accountable were not.
Please tell me how,
logically, the Worthington Kilbourne student council should be held accountable for the actions of any Westboro members or for any expenses, if there are any, that result from their protest?