dlazz;792845 wrote: *Motorola can't make a phone to save their life.
LOL. ok.
dlazz;792845 wrote: *Motorola can't make a phone to save their life.
dlazz;792845 wrote:*Motorola can't make a phone to save their life.
j_crazy;792965 wrote:I second this.
My history with motorola phones:
2003 Motorla V60i - had battery issues, spent 3 months of my 1 year contract without a phone because of them needing the phone to repair
2005 Motorola v270 - had battery issues, replaced the phone 2 times in my 2 year contract because new batteries didn't fix the issue.
2007 Motorola RAZR V3 - had the phone 2 days when it completely shit itself, don't know what happened but the screen quit lighting up. I could call and text, but had a black screen so I couldn't see what I was typing, or who I was calling/calling me.
Swore off Motorola phones at that point.
sherm03;792982 wrote:Just like it's silly to come to the conclusion that Motorola can't make a phone to save their life based on a bad device and a refurb phone that was acting goofy.
Disagree. X2 is Moto's best phone at VZW. And the Droid 3 is coming soon. You won't have to worry about customers getting the 2 much longer.gport_tennis;792989 wrote:The droid x is motorolas best phone right now for verizon. I see droid 2s all the time acting up in my store. Its kinda sad because its the only high end droid with a slide out keyboard, I almost feel bad when people get it because I know they probably will have issues with it at some point
Sent from my SCH-I800 using Tapatalk
dlazz;793010 wrote:How? I'm 0/4 on Motorola devices.
sherm03;793018 wrote:Disagree. X2 is Moto's best phone at VZW. And the Droid 3 is coming soon. You won't have to worry about customers getting the 2 much longer.
You only mentioned 2 devices in your post. One new that was acting up, and a refurbished model that had GPS issues.
I Wear Pants;793157 wrote:They do ruin everything with shitty Motoblur.
OneBuckeye;793150 wrote:I still have my original droid and have had 0 issues.
I Wear Pants;793157 wrote:They do ruin everything with shitty Motoblur.
dlazz;793182 wrote:I'd be OK with Motoblur if it improved upon stock android, but it simply does not. It offers no new functionality, so it is unnecessary and bloated.
wghfan;828228 wrote:The Samsung Infuse for AT&T is getting some high praise. Does anyone have one?
Scarlet_Buckeye;844238 wrote:Now that the iPhone 5 is all but officially being reported to be released the second week of September, what does everything think about the chances of it being 4G LTE compatible?
At first, all the reports were saying that the iPhone 5 would NOT be 4G LTE compatible because of the negative effect on battery life [i.e., 4G LTE sucks a battery's life like Dracula, supposedly]. Now, reports are coming out that signs are pointing to the iPhone 5 being 4G LTE compatible due to AT&T looking to acquire T-Mobile and the recent marketing campaigns pushing 4G networks by major wireless providers. It would seem to be an unwise decision to release anything at this point that isn't 4G LTE compatible.
Thoughts?
Scarlet_Buckeye;844738 wrote:I just can't fathom anyone putting out any new phones that are NOT 4G. I mean, everywhere you look, SOMEONE is releasing a phone and it's 4G! Why would someone invest in something that is just going to be outdated in a year? Yeah 4G isn't big right now, but anyone who tries to deny it's presence, say a year from now, is a damn fool!
Scarlet_Buckeye;844738 wrote:I just can't fathom anyone putting out any new phones that are NOT 4G.