sleeper;729342 wrote:Facebook the company isn't that much bigger than Facebook the site, if at all. I wouldn't expect Microsoft's site to be worth as much as the company, but when you're primary business is your site, it's gotta be damn close.
revgat;729348 wrote:I didn't mean it that way. Their numbers are probably off, but they are valuing based off of page views and add revenue. Facebook is valued at $50 billion based on potential, not on current revenue.
He doesn't quite have it right, but he's close. Facebook, assets and all, are the $50B mark. The site itself (directories, hosting, domain, etc.) is the $1.1B value.sleeper;729452 wrote:SMH, never mind. It's not even worth explaining to you.
Most valuations I've seen have it somewhere between 25 and 75 billion. Though the most recent I read was 60-75.sleeper;729319 wrote:Honestly, this site has zero credibility. It has Facebook worth 1 billion or so, and there's no doubt its worth way more than that, like 40-50 billion.
I Wear Pants;729520 wrote:Most valuations I've seen have it somewhere between 25 and 75 billion. Though the most recent I read was 60-75.
Related, Zynga (the company that makes Farmville and such) has been valued in the $10 billion range by some. Incredible.
You may not, but in actuality, people still do. Not like they used to, but they do.thavoice;729780 wrote:I know they look at page views and such for ad revenue.
My questin is this.....who pays attentioni to the ads on webpages? I seriously blank out on adverstiesments on websites and radio and even tv. We can be watching a show and commmericals come on and someone will comment on the commercial and I will be like.....'huh....i didnt even pay attention'.
Not what advertisers wanna see but still
I think the more and more we get inundated with ads in increasing numbers and different ways more people start to tune them out.O-Trap;729825 wrote:You may not, but in actuality, people still do. Not like they used to, but they do.
It's funny you mention it, because I know that I notice them from time to time (and trust me, I've been inundated with banners to the hilt), as they are usually "targeted" (related to the discussion at hand). If it's something I care about, I may click through. Actually, one of them on here was a non-profit political organization that will soon be a client of my employer ... all because I saw a banner for them on here.thavoice;729833 wrote:I think the more and more we get inundated with ads in increasing numbers and different ways more people start to tune them out.
Just my thoughts.
vball10set;729859 wrote:I wonder how much Mike Clark's site is worth?
O-Trap;729865 wrote:- $2
Well then it is people like you who make the ads keep on coming!!!O-Trap;729856 wrote:It's funny you mention it, because I know that I notice them from time to time (and trust me, I've been inundated with banners to the hilt), as they are usually "targeted" (related to the discussion at hand). If it's something I care about, I may click through. Actually, one of them on here was a non-profit political organization that will soon be a client of my employer ... all because I saw a banner for them on here.
Heretic;729881 wrote:And getting less valuable per day.
O-Trap;729889 wrote:That's because:
justincredible;729892 wrote:Hackzorz
justincredible;729892 wrote:Hackzorz
Heretic;729921 wrote:Hopefully this sets up another epic "SKITTLES SKITTLES SKITTLES SKITTLES SKITTLES SKITTLES" rant.
