rock_knutne;717903 wrote:LOL.....link? You're telling me you haven't seen players get mugged at the very end of a close game and nothing gets called.......especially when there's a mad scramble for the ball during a rebound? I don't know what you've been watching but it happens all the time.

rock_knutne;717908 wrote:That may be your opinion but again, it happens all the time at the end of a close game, even in the tournament. Guys getting hacked all over the place for a loose ball.

I'm just saying that I find it strange that the refs didn't swallow their whistles at the end of the game, that's all.

karen lotz;717909 wrote:Mad scramble? It wasn't a loose ball, Howard had it in control. How you can think that was a foul that COULD go uncalled is beyond me. One of the analysts said it appeared that the Pitt player thought they were down and INTENTIONALLY fouled. There is absolutely no chance that foul isn't getting called.

ytownfootball;717912 wrote:The difference was that these two were clearly not mad scraps for a loose ball, they were wide open and not open for interpretation, you don't make those as a ref then they're the ones being questioned. They have to make those calls imo.

rock_knutne;717914 wrote:No need to make a big deal over it, we can agree to disagree. Again, MY POINT is I've seen that very same situation let go plenty of times.

rock_knutne;717915 wrote:I must have saw something different because it appeared there was a mad scramble for the rebound off of the missed free throw. Maybe I was watching a different game.:rolleyes:

karen lotz;717918 wrote:That's fine, but my point is I have never seen a situation like that where there are 2 obvious boneheaded fouls like that, especially in the same 2.5 second timespan. Those refs would never be allowed to ref a tournament game again if they didn't make those calls.

The difference was that these two were clearly not mad scraps for a loose ball, they were wide open and not open for interpretation, you don't make those as a ref then they're the ones being questioned. They have to make those calls imo.

I must have saw something different because it appeared there was a mad scramble for the rebound off of the missed free throw. Maybe I was watching a different game.:rolleyes:

ytownfootball;717919 wrote:Roll your eyes all you want, bottom line is, well, you're wrong. :rolleyes:

rock_knutne;717925 wrote:No, the bottome lione is I'm wrong in your eyes because you disagree with me.

ytownfootball;717928 wrote:The bottome lione is we're all wrong because we're not Big East fans in your eyes.

ytownfootball;717928 wrote:The bottome lione is we're all wrong because we're not Big East fans in your eyes.

wildcats20;717924 wrote:Lol. Howard had possession. He was the only one who touched the ball.

rock_knutne;717931 wrote:He came down with it but there was three or four guys going up for it, contact all the way around.

ytownfootball;717937 wrote:I'm just giving you shit, relax man...

One guy came down with it and one guy mugged him...lol, I mean it was pretty cut and dry actually

rock_knutne;717940 wrote:You have an odd way of showing it.

ytownfootball;717941 wrote:I leave you alone 99% of the time, how would you know? Lol

rock_knutne;717906 wrote:Nice try retard but if you bothered to read any of the other posts I made in this thread you'd see that I don't care either way. FYI, I don't root for Pitt. It's amazing how you show up when I post, you're a fucking weirdo stalker!

rock_knutne;717946 wrote:Gee thanks.

killer_ewok;717690 wrote:Best of luck to Pitt. I have them going all the way in my brackets.

chicago510;717720 wrote:Those who don't study history are bound to repeat it. My condolences.