enigmaax;703989 wrote:No, you try and keep up. They lied once (in December) about a timeline. I'm not really gonna take them at their word this time.
Who lied, not the University but Tress. The Univ didn't know about the emails till Jan and that is why Tress is now being punished, jees why is this so hard for some of you to understand? And did Tress really lie? If indeed it was a lawyer that stated it must remain confidential, I believe that is binding in a court of law???? Someone there help out with that?