Writerbuckeye;697584 wrote:That's your comparison? How lame.
True or not: just about every supplemental contract a teacher can get is for an activity that involves learning? Sports, year book, paper, plays. All related to what a teacher does best (supposedly), which is to teach and help kids learn. It's not in a classroom typically, but the basics of teaching and learning are the same.
Why you folks are splitting hairs on this is somewhat telling, I guess. You simply don't want your salary to look too high (whatever that is) so you're trying to keep it as low as possible.
It's lame, too, by the way.
sleeper;697594 wrote:At least you get paid for doing extra responsibilities. In the real world, if you're boss tells you to do something that's outside your scope of work, you do it.
Teachers are spoiled. I hope the hammer comes down hard on these people, time for reality.
You nitwits. I'm not even a teacher. I am for SB5. But how can you not see this simple thing.
Writer, learning has nothing to do with it. It's an extra job not part of your regular duties. You are compensated extra and separately. The end.
Another example?
Teacher A is a 6th grade math teacher and makes $50k.
Teacher B is also a 6th grade math teacher and makes $50k.
Teacher B is also the Head Varsity Football coach for $10k, Varsity track coach for $8k, and Junior Class Advisor for $3k.
Who has the higher TEACHER salary?