wkfan;689959 wrote:I understand the differences in terms of hours....again, it is all relative.
As far as school debt, that is a choice that a law student makes. If they don't want to incur the debt, then either choose another field or find another way to pay for it.
My point wasn't that they don't want to incur debt; my point was the reason they make large starting salaries (which you made a point to compare teching salary with an attorney salary) is because they go to school and have massive amounts of student loan debt. If firms didn't offer large salaries, they wouldn't attract the best lawyers from the best schools (which are expensive). Teachers don't make as much because they are not in as high demand apparently. Simple economics.
wkfan;689959 wrote:BTW....very few districts offer tuition assistance. My wife, son, daughter-in-law, 3 nieces, sister-in-law and son's girlfriend all paid for their master's degree out of pocket. Not one taxpayer dollar went toward their tuition, supplies, etc. Very comparable.
I could list all the teachers I know that HAVE had their Master's paid for by the district they work in, it is anecdotal evidence. Just because the people you know haven't had it paid for doesn't mean it still doesn't occur in many districts.
All you need to do is a little research through Google and you can find a lot of Ohio school districts that reimburse. It's unfortunate that your relatives didn't work in districts that didn't offer this, but I guess that was their choice to work in those districts. Here is a few articles related to tuition assistance that I found just by googling:
http://www.ohio.edu/careers/students/manage/images/TRC-Org-List-1-28.pdf
http://www.springboro.k12.oh.us/files/resources/tuition.pdf
http://www.das.ohio.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=WNVmTUL6jrI%3D&tabid=462
http://www.das.ohio.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=A%2B7kGW7LCe8%3D&tabid=427
http://www.tygerpride.com/page.cfm?p=1797