data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c82f/4c82f388828d7e06ea92094f65fae35c079e28c8" alt="Hb31187's avatar"
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Feb 15, 2011 11:10pm
karen lotz;680217 wrote:That would put them at 17-13 right? Is that really worthy of a bid?
With their name, and RPI it very well could
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/423e5/423e586f161548da33227d282d03be8f5986371a" alt="stroups's avatar"
stroups
Posts: 3,223
Feb 15, 2011 11:11pm
karen lotz;680217 wrote:That would put them at 17-13 right? Is that really worthy of a bid?
yes................................ to the NIT
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce14d/ce14df28d581fef2c132c8c500a04771f111e527" alt="wildcats20's avatar"
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Feb 15, 2011 11:12pm
stroups;680220 wrote:yes................................ to the NIT
But the B10 is sooooooooooooo strong this year. :rolleyes:
BTW this is sarcasm. No one get their panties in a bunch.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff509/ff509c258ec4ff4b2d9cb2b9a76ce97e3adfb774" alt="chicago510's avatar"
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
Feb 15, 2011 11:12pm
How in the world is MSU 14-11. I love Izzo, but this team is sloppy and gets away from what they do best, pound the paint.
Did Derrell Summers graduate or something? My goodness he was invisible.
Did Derrell Summers graduate or something? My goodness he was invisible.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/805c6/805c635f04f6feb57be120f47f5071504051c3a4" alt="ytownfootball's avatar"
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Feb 15, 2011 11:13pm
I think they'll be in if they win the 3 of 5. 9-9 in the B1G will probably do it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee697/ee697dcb2009d77d4bd2162d3abe0d37dcebec8b" alt="Cleveland Buck's avatar"
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Feb 15, 2011 11:13pm
Hb31187;680219 wrote:With their name, RPI, SOS, and quality wins it very well could
Pretty much. 17-13 doesn't mean much when you look at who they have played compared to a 20-10 team in some other league.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04070/040706bb489394922a49b721280970518891060e" alt="gerb131's avatar"
gerb131
Posts: 9,932
Feb 15, 2011 11:14pm
Matta needs to run that diamond trap more esp in bigger games. Lauderdale has earned more minutes and William Buford aint coming back is what I got from this game.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce14d/ce14df28d581fef2c132c8c500a04771f111e527" alt="wildcats20's avatar"
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Feb 15, 2011 11:15pm
Cleveland Buck;680225 wrote:Pretty much. 17-13 doesn't mean much when you look at who they have played compared to a 20-10 team in some other league.
Yeah their out of conference schedule is always what will trump some other team who doesn't play the same type games.
P
Prescott
Posts: 2,569
Feb 15, 2011 11:15pm
I hope MSU makes the tournament. They would be a very dangerous 8-9-10 seed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/805c6/805c635f04f6feb57be120f47f5071504051c3a4" alt="ytownfootball's avatar"
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Feb 15, 2011 11:15pm
MSU's sos is #14
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce14d/ce14df28d581fef2c132c8c500a04771f111e527" alt="wildcats20's avatar"
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Feb 15, 2011 11:16pm
ytownfootball;680231 wrote:MSU's sos is #14
RPI is 47. Really thought it would be higher.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/423e5/423e586f161548da33227d282d03be8f5986371a" alt="stroups's avatar"
stroups
Posts: 3,223
Feb 15, 2011 11:16pm
Prescott;680229 wrote:I hope MSU makes the tournament. They would be a very dangerous 8-9-10 seed.
In all honesty, I wouldn't want to have them in my bracket
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/805c6/805c635f04f6feb57be120f47f5071504051c3a4" alt="ytownfootball's avatar"
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Feb 15, 2011 11:18pm
wildcats20;680232 wrote:RPI is 47. Really thought it would be higher.
Their "good wins" aren't all that impressive though, a bad loss in Iowa too (at home)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff509/ff509c258ec4ff4b2d9cb2b9a76ce97e3adfb774" alt="chicago510's avatar"
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
Feb 15, 2011 11:19pm
Tournament added 3 at larges though, could be MSU's savior.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce14d/ce14df28d581fef2c132c8c500a04771f111e527" alt="wildcats20's avatar"
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Feb 15, 2011 11:19pm
ytownfootball;680236 wrote:Their "good wins" aren't all that impressive though, a bad loss in Iowa too (at home)
True. Guess I'm just too used to seeing them up there.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af8d2/af8d2bf505032e4df98561d5cf2f042a67089d20" alt="Tiger2003's avatar"
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Feb 15, 2011 11:22pm
gerb131;680226 wrote:Matta needs to run that diamond trap more esp in bigger games. Lauderdale has earned more minutes and William Buford aint coming back is what I got from this game.
I believe Buford is gone. He is a 1st round pick.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d443/4d4435fbdb616d7f38c335f5aea4e384c2cada35" alt="Ankle Breaker's avatar"
Ankle Breaker
Posts: 398
Feb 15, 2011 11:25pm
Buford can flat stroke it. Hope he comes back but if he continues as he has played of late....well, bye bye.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04070/040706bb489394922a49b721280970518891060e" alt="gerb131's avatar"
gerb131
Posts: 9,932
Feb 15, 2011 11:26pm
Tiger2003;680242 wrote:I believe Buford is gone. He is a 1st round pick.
I think so as well.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e4a2/3e4a2077c1f3e45dab8e238c44b7bb2b3ea4d05c" alt="Mulva's avatar"
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Feb 15, 2011 11:29pm
Cleveland Buck;680225 wrote:Pretty much. 17-13 doesn't mean much when you look at who they have played compared to a 20-10 team in some other league.
It doesn't matter who you play if you don't beat any of them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fe6b/4fe6b4547c8454a59e70b8cece0bddf568256a67" alt="Laley23's avatar"
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Feb 15, 2011 11:32pm
Ive already stated I think MSU is going to be the 68th team and win 5 games en route to the Final Four. It would only be fitting for the first year of expansion.
P
Prescott
Posts: 2,569
Feb 15, 2011 11:34pm
MSU did a great job limiting Sullinger's touches.He only took 8 shots and he had 2 rebounds.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bce86/bce863ad5bd6949a54b80d6ca3a9213fd6a43c44" alt="Midstate01's avatar"
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Feb 15, 2011 11:36pm
Satch sullinger just told Dave biddle that sully will be back for his sophmore season.
C
centralbucksfan
Posts: 5,111
Feb 15, 2011 11:37pm
Mulva;680249 wrote:It doesn't matter who you play if you don't beat any of them.
This! People keep talkign about how tough MSU schedule, and it is. But you have to win some of those games, and they haven't. 17-13 isn't going to get them in the NCAA. They have had some BAD losses on top of that. And they haven't won on the road in the Big Ten...which the NCAA will frown upon as well.
BTW, good ball game tonite, great atmosphere at the Schott! Who woulda thought with Sullinger playing his worst game of the year, that OSU wins this by double digits. Did TV say anything about him being sick/ill? He just didn't look himself tonite, didn't have his usual hop in his game, looked pretty tired and looked like he almost was going to throw up during one of the timeouts.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/805c6/805c635f04f6feb57be120f47f5071504051c3a4" alt="ytownfootball's avatar"
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Feb 15, 2011 11:37pm
Prescott;680256 wrote:MSU did a great job limiting Sullinger's touches.He only took 8 shots and he had 2 rebounds.
They did and give them credit, but Sully was off it appeared, he lost the handle more than a couple times when he usually doesn't.
C
centralbucksfan
Posts: 5,111
Feb 15, 2011 11:38pm
Laley23;680255 wrote:Ive already stated I think MSU is going to be the 68th team and win 5 games en route to the Final Four. It would only be fitting for the first year of expansion.
I'll take that bet right now. As a matter of fact, I may take the best they don't even make the NCAA. This team is way to sloppy, turn it over way too many times and don't have the usual MSU composure of past MSU teams. As I said prior to this game, u don't just flip a switch and turn good this late in the season.