karen lotz;680217 wrote:That would put them at 17-13 right? Is that really worthy of a bid?
With their name, and RPI it very well could
karen lotz;680217 wrote:That would put them at 17-13 right? Is that really worthy of a bid?
karen lotz;680217 wrote:That would put them at 17-13 right? Is that really worthy of a bid?
stroups;680220 wrote:yes................................ to the NIT
Hb31187;680219 wrote:With their name, RPI, SOS, and quality wins it very well could
Cleveland Buck;680225 wrote:Pretty much. 17-13 doesn't mean much when you look at who they have played compared to a 20-10 team in some other league.
ytownfootball;680231 wrote:MSU's sos is #14
Prescott;680229 wrote:I hope MSU makes the tournament. They would be a very dangerous 8-9-10 seed.
wildcats20;680232 wrote:RPI is 47. Really thought it would be higher.
ytownfootball;680236 wrote:Their "good wins" aren't all that impressive though, a bad loss in Iowa too (at home)
gerb131;680226 wrote:Matta needs to run that diamond trap more esp in bigger games. Lauderdale has earned more minutes and William Buford aint coming back is what I got from this game.
Tiger2003;680242 wrote:I believe Buford is gone. He is a 1st round pick.
Cleveland Buck;680225 wrote:Pretty much. 17-13 doesn't mean much when you look at who they have played compared to a 20-10 team in some other league.
Mulva;680249 wrote:It doesn't matter who you play if you don't beat any of them.
Prescott;680256 wrote:MSU did a great job limiting Sullinger's touches.He only took 8 shots and he had 2 rebounds.
Laley23;680255 wrote:Ive already stated I think MSU is going to be the 68th team and win 5 games en route to the Final Four. It would only be fitting for the first year of expansion.