ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Feb 10, 2011 11:56am
karen lotz;672972 wrote:He didn't say 2011, but considering the OP said they turned down a game for opening weekend of 2011, that could be implied. Why would TCU call OSU about a game for 2011 when their schedule is already set. I'm sorry you can't put 2 and 2 together.
Doesn't matter what year, pick one. But I'm not implying a damn thing.
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Feb 10, 2011 11:58am
karen lotz;672976 wrote:Right. I'm sure TCU is skeerd of OSU. Also, TCU didn't buy the billboard space in Columbus. A TCU alum did. Small difference.
Just like Notre Dame is skeerd of joining the Big Ten.
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Feb 10, 2011 11:59am
karen lotz;672972 wrote:He didn't say 2011, but considering the OP said they turned down a game for opening weekend of 2011, that could be implied. Why would TCU call OSU about a game for 2011 when their schedule is already set. I'm sorry you can't put 2 and 2 together.
So basically your trying to imply what someone is thinking.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Feb 10, 2011 11:59am
Ok, I pick 2011.ytownfootball;672977 wrote:Doesn't matter what year, pick one. But I'm not implying a damn thing.
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Feb 10, 2011 11:59am
Tiger2003;672982 wrote:Just like Notre Dame is skeerd of joining the Big Ten.
come on now.. you know it makes "no sense" for notre dame to join the big 10
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Feb 10, 2011 12:03pm
karen lotz;672985 wrote:Ok, I pick 2011.
Fail.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Feb 10, 2011 12:04pm
OSU had an opening. TCU didn't call then.No he didn't.No he definitely didn't say 2011.
He didn't say 2011, but considering the OP said they turned down a game for opening weekend of 2011, that could be implied. Why would TCU call OSU about a game for 2011 when their schedule is already set. I'm sorry you can't put 2 and 2 together.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Feb 10, 2011 12:06pm
It doesn't matter that TCU didn't buy the billboards...did they stand by them? Did they issue a statement that in any way infers or implies they felt any differently...uh no.
They shouldn't be all badass when you don't extend the offer. Lol
They shouldn't be all badass when you don't extend the offer. Lol
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Feb 10, 2011 12:09pm
Tiger2003;672964 wrote:Once again TCU is not tOSU!!!! So no they would not.
+1000
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Feb 10, 2011 12:11pm
Easy for him to say, knowing it isn't going to happen.dat dude;672878 wrote:Make it happen, please.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Feb 10, 2011 12:13pm
wildcats20;672999 wrote:OSU had an opening. TCU didn't call then.
I assume you are referring to the Colorado date? The original OSU schedule had Bowling Green on it.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Feb 10, 2011 12:15pm
It would be sweet as an OSU fan to schedule TCU or Boise to a home and home. We would have one of the toughest OOC records in the country. If it was a 2011-2012 thing, in 2012 we'd play Cal and UC at home, and TCU on the road. That'd be a ridiculous OOC schedule.
Now, the way reaching the BCS game is set up, no chance in hell does OSU do this. But from a fan's perspective, it'd be cool.
Now, the way reaching the BCS game is set up, no chance in hell does OSU do this. But from a fan's perspective, it'd be cool.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Feb 10, 2011 12:17pm
karen lotz;673028 wrote:I assume you are referring to the Colorado date? The original OSU schedule had Bowling Green on it.
So that proves OSU would be willing to re do the schedule, more proof of why they should just man-up or shut up.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Feb 10, 2011 12:20pm
SportsAndLady;673034 wrote:It would be sweet as an OSU fan to schedule TCU or Boise to a home and home. We would have one of the toughest OOC records in the country. If it was a 2011-2012 thing, in 2012 we'd play Cal and UC at home, and TCU on the road. That'd be a ridiculous OOC schedule.
Now, the way reaching the BCS game is set up, no chance in hell does OSU do this. But from a fan's perspective, it'd be cool.
I do agree with you that it would be a great OOC schedule. I also am glad that you added that last line about the BCS. It isn't part of OSU's schedule model to have 2 strong OOC games. That is the way most teams do it these days. Having the big OOC game already scheduled for 10 years or whatever it is is why I said that OSU won't add a home and home with TCU anytime soon.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Feb 10, 2011 12:22pm
ytownfootball;673040 wrote:So that proves OSU would be willing to re do the schedule, more proof of why they should just man-up or shut up.
Colorado was looking for a huge payout because their Athletic Department is having money problems. Like I said in my first post, TCU is not looking for a big pay day.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Feb 10, 2011 12:25pm
karen lotz;673050 wrote:TCU is not looking for a big pay day.
Everybody is looking for a big pay day.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Feb 10, 2011 12:25pm
karen lotz;673050 wrote:Colorado was looking for a huge payout because their Athletic Department is having money problems. Like I said in my first post, TCU is not looking for a big pay day.
TCU is looking for respect...you don't get it by kicking sand from a mile away. Put up or shut up.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Feb 10, 2011 12:27pm
karen lotz;673050 wrote:Colorado was looking for a huge payout because their Athletic Department is having money problems. Like I said in my first post, TCU is not looking for a big pay day.
I'm not so sure about that...
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/sports_college/2009/07/how-much-revenue-did-your-favorite-fbs-school-take-in-in-200708-this-chart-will-tell-you.html
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Feb 10, 2011 12:29pm
True, except TCU is looking for theirs in terms of a home and home with Wisconsin, not to be a sacrificial lamb like Colorado.SportsAndLady;673056 wrote:Everybody is looking for a big pay day.
ytownfootball;673057 wrote:TCU is looking for respect...you don't get it by kicking sand from a mile away. Put up or shut up.
Didn't they just beat Wisconsin in the Rose Bowl? It would appear that Wisconsin is dodging a trip to TCU, not the other way around.
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Feb 10, 2011 12:31pm
You can rule out a OSU-Boise home and home, maybe a home and neutral or a neutral/neutral, but OSU isn't playing an OOC game in a stadium that only holds about 30,000. TCU only holds about 40,000, so that isn't happening either.
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Feb 10, 2011 12:33pm
How is Wisconsin dodging TCU?
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Feb 10, 2011 12:33pm
karen lotz;673068 wrote:True, except TCU is looking for theirs in terms of a home and home with Wisconsin, not to be a sacrificial lamb like Colorado.
Didn't they just beat Wisconsin in the Rose Bowl? It would appear that Wisconsin is dodging a trip to TCU, not the other way around.
Just because they feel they've earned respect in a one game, neutral site win over Wisconsin doesn't mean anyone else does. I know I don't.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Feb 10, 2011 12:36pm
Tiger2003;673076 wrote:How is Wisconsin dodging TCU?
I said they were dodging a trip to TCU. TCU wants a return date, Wisconsin wants only 1 game in Madison.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Feb 10, 2011 12:38pm
se-alum;673073 wrote:You can rule out a OSU-Boise home and home, maybe a home and neutral or a neutral/neutral, but OSU isn't playing an OOC game in a stadium that only holds about 30,000. TCU only holds about 40,000, so that isn't happening either.
this could be a reason Wisky didn't want to agree on a home and home?
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Feb 10, 2011 12:38pm
Tiger2003;672861 wrote:TCU turns down a chance to play in Madison on opening week of college football in the 2011 season. TCU AD said he didn't like that it was just a 1 year deal.
I dont give a fuck if it's a 1, 2 or 3 year deal, TCU should have jumped at this I think. TCU will open with Baylor instead.
http://sports.espn.go.com/dallas/ncf/news/story?id=6106632
The Badgers are the ones who appear to have a fear of flying.