Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems
Log In Create Account

Super Bowl XLV: Pittsburgh Steelers vs Green Bay Packers

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ Super Bowl XLV: Pittsburgh Steelers vs Green Bay Packers
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
Feb 4, 2011 1:31 PM
rock_knutne;664770 wrote:That's ONE person! King is one of very few who got it right.
I like how you're trying to discredit SI. At the beginning of the season all you hear was Steelers just need to go 2-2 without ben and they'll be fine. Show me these article of people not giving the steelers credit. The pack get more credit cause they made it to the SB with an entire team list of injuries.
Feb 4, 2011 1:31pm
Non's avatar

Non

Senior Member

9,517 posts
Feb 4, 2011 1:31 PM
A lot of people are just picking the Packers because they don't want the Steelers to win again. Not for any sound reason.

It's either Aaron Rodgers will torch them or the Packers will win because I hate the Steelers.

The second one means nothing so that puts it mostly on Rodgers having a terrific game, which is possible but the Steelers have some pretty good defensive players. Better than the Falcons.
Feb 4, 2011 1:31pm
T

thavoice

Senior Member

14,376 posts
Feb 4, 2011 1:35 PM
I am picking the Packers because I feel their passing attack will be the difference. If the Bears had pulled out the win vs GB>...man I would be all over pretty much guarenteeing a steelers win.

I look at GB to go for what NE usually does to the steelers
Feb 4, 2011 1:35pm
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
Feb 4, 2011 1:37 PM
DeyDurkie5;664773 wrote:this rock guy is really starting to show his true colors

+1
Feb 4, 2011 1:37pm
Non's avatar

Non

Senior Member

9,517 posts
Feb 4, 2011 1:39 PM
31 of the 45 personalities on ESPN.com picked the Packers
Feb 4, 2011 1:39pm
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
Feb 4, 2011 1:40 PM
Non;664802 wrote:31 of the 45 personalities on ESPN.com picked the Packers
Those ignorant ass holes!! Must be blind steeler hate.
Feb 4, 2011 1:40pm
Non's avatar

Non

Senior Member

9,517 posts
Feb 4, 2011 1:48 PM
Raw Dawgin' it;664803 wrote:Those ignorant ass holes!! Must be blind steeler hate.

Just posted it for the record.

But kind of surprising it's that much in the Packers favor.

Even if I wasn't a Steelers fan I think this game is about even.
Feb 4, 2011 1:48pm
T

thavoice

Senior Member

14,376 posts
Feb 4, 2011 1:50 PM
Bettting must also be about even as I have not seen the line change at all.
Feb 4, 2011 1:50pm
T

thavoice

Senior Member

14,376 posts
Feb 4, 2011 1:53 PM
Oh cool....steelers have the celebrity vote of confidence. I am guessing of the 96 asked....90 had to be told what two teams were even playing....and probably 45 wondered why anyone cared about a bowling tournament
Feb 4, 2011 1:53pm
Non's avatar

Non

Senior Member

9,517 posts
Feb 4, 2011 2:03 PM
I may have said this before but I think a pivotal player in this game will be David Johnson.

Tight end/fullback.

When the Steelers have success on the ground, he's usually a big reason with his lead blocking for Mendenhall.

Nobody really knows the guy. Hasn't received any press this week but for what they want to do in running the ball he must block well and get to that extra defender.
Feb 4, 2011 2:03pm
Automatik's avatar

Automatik

Senior Member

14,632 posts
Feb 4, 2011 2:08 PM
Non;664726 wrote:If Aaron Rodgers plays as great as everyone says he's going to play, I'll certainly tip my cap.

But I think the Steelers defense is getting disrespected. And they're going to play a lot better than people think.
I agree. If Green Bay wins I won't be heartbroken. I like Arod's game and I've always been a fan of the Packers organization. Of course I want a Pittsburgh W, but I also realize that 3 championships in 6 years isn't an easy task. I'm still confident Pittsburgh will get it done.
Feb 4, 2011 2:08pm
Non's avatar

Non

Senior Member

9,517 posts
Feb 4, 2011 2:13 PM
Automatik;664837 wrote:I agree. If Green Bay wins I won't be heartbroken. I like Arod's game and I've always been a fan of the Packers organization. Of course I want a Pittsburgh W, but I also realize that 3 championships in 6 years isn't an easy task. I'm still confident Pittsburgh will get it done.

Yeah, the Steelers will fight to the death. So in that sense, if the Packers win it's going to take a performance where you'll have to respect them in the end.
Feb 4, 2011 2:13pm
Automatik's avatar

Automatik

Senior Member

14,632 posts
Feb 4, 2011 2:17 PM
I'd really like to have the exact same start as we did against NY. Get the rock first, then a methodical clock, eating drive ending in a touchdown.
Feb 4, 2011 2:17pm
R

rock_knutne

Feb 4, 2011 2:18 PM
Raw Dawgin' it;664785 wrote:I like how you're trying to discredit SI. At the beginning of the season all you hear was Steelers just need to go 2-2 without ben and they'll be fine. Show me these article of people not giving the steelers credit. The pack get more credit cause they made it to the SB with an entire team list of injuries.
It's ONE person from SI........how damn dunce are you!

You can find the articles yourself, there's this website called google, it's works really well! As for your iditotic injury bullshit, the Steelers have been hit with a ton of injuries too, especially on the Oline, so your reason why the Packers are getting all the pub is dead wrong (as you usually are).
Feb 4, 2011 2:18pm
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
Feb 4, 2011 2:20 PM
rock_knutne;664843 wrote:It's ONE person from SI........how damn dunce are you!

I believe the word is dense...fwiw
Feb 4, 2011 2:20pm
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
Feb 4, 2011 2:29 PM
Oh man, he has therapist look in his eyes!

Feb 4, 2011 2:29pm
Automatik's avatar

Automatik

Senior Member

14,632 posts
Feb 4, 2011 2:33 PM
lol he looks like a lumberjack.
Feb 4, 2011 2:33pm
Non's avatar

Non

Senior Member

9,517 posts
Feb 4, 2011 2:34 PM
Automatik;664842 wrote:I'd really like to have the exact same start as we did against NY. Get the rock first, then a methodical clock, eating drive ending in a touchdown.

That raises a good question, do you want the ball first?

I'm usually for the defense being on the field first but that opening drive in the AFC championship game was big.

Imagine Rodgers having to stand on the sideline through all the festivities and then for another nine-minute drive which would be a lot longer in real time.

However, if the defense can get that one stop then the Steelers can still have a long opening drive, get points on the board, and they would still have the ball in the second half.

I say defense first in this game but it's close.
Feb 4, 2011 2:34pm
T

thavoice

Senior Member

14,376 posts
Feb 4, 2011 2:38 PM
Non;664864 wrote:That raises a good question, do you want the ball first?

I'm usually for the defense being on the field first but that opening drive in the AFC championship game was big.

Imagine Rodgers having to stand on the sideline through all the festivities and then for another nine-minute drive which would be a lot longer in real time.

However, if the defense can get that one stop then the Steelers can still have a long opening drive, get points on the board, and they would still have the ball in the second half.

I say defense first in this game but it's close.


Defense first.

I wonder iff BR has his hand on that womans ass
Feb 4, 2011 2:38pm
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
Feb 4, 2011 2:40 PM
I think you put your D out first, rather have the ball at half time especially if things aren't going your teams way
Feb 4, 2011 2:40pm
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
Feb 4, 2011 3:24 PM
rock_knutne;664885 wrote:No, I have the right word:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dunce
Dunce is a noun, in the sentence you used it in "how damn dunce are you!" you use dunce as an adjective (which it's not). Instead of trying to sound smart you should have just put the word stupid. There is definitely some irony here...
Feb 4, 2011 3:24pm
R

rock_knutne

Feb 4, 2011 3:28 PM
Raw Dawgin' it;664892 wrote:Dunce is a noun, in the sentence you used it in "how damn dunce are you!" you use dunce as an adjective (which it's not). Instead of trying to sound smart you should have just put the word stupid. There is definitely some irony here...
No irony just accuracy on my part.......stupid, dunce, retarded........whatever word you want to use, be it a noun or adjective.
Feb 4, 2011 3:28pm
R

rock_knutne

Feb 4, 2011 3:30 PM
Nice day in the office today. We had a great Super Bowl party and now taking the staff out for an early happy hour over at Atria's in PNC Park.
Feb 4, 2011 3:30pm