Wednesday: Ohio State (16-0) at Michigan (11-5), 6:30 PM

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ Wednesday: Ohio State (16-0) at Michigan (11-5), 6:30 PM
D

dave

Senior Member

4,558 posts
Jan 12, 2011 11:49 PM
Morris was the best player on the court. He was a little cocky but it was at key times trying to get the crowd into it.

Diebler didn't do much but his back to back (i think) 3s seemed to be the key to the game IMO.
Jan 12, 2011 11:49pm
D

dat dude

Senior Member

1,564 posts
Jan 12, 2011 11:51 PM
dave;636537 wrote:Morris was the best player on the court.

For Michigan, right?
Jan 12, 2011 11:51pm
hoops23's avatar

hoops23

Senior Member

15,696 posts
Jan 13, 2011 12:12 AM
dat dude;636540 wrote:For Michigan, right?

lol, right...

And please, getting in David Lighty's face and bumping him with your chest isn't "getting the crowd into it"... Nor is slapping the ball out of Sullingers hands and following him up court while chirping in his ear.
Jan 13, 2011 12:12am
D

dave

Senior Member

4,558 posts
Jan 13, 2011 12:34 AM
dat dude;636540 wrote:For Michigan, right?

did i studder?
hoops23;636560 wrote:lol, right...

And please, getting in David Lighty's face and bumping him with your chest isn't "getting the crowd into it"... Nor is slapping the ball out of Sullingers hands and following him up court while chirping in his ear.
What a surprise, whining like a little kid again. Pretty much every post of yours is the same. Try watching a game as a neutral observer.

Who do you think was the best player on the court in this game? Buford, Sullinger, Diebler all had a nice stretch at one point, but none had the impact that Morris did. I'm guessing he accounted for 2/3 of their points tonight. OSU should learn from this game and have a better gameplan in Columbus
Jan 13, 2011 12:34am
D

dat dude

Senior Member

1,564 posts
Jan 13, 2011 12:40 AM
dave;636590 wrote:did i studder?



What a surprise, whining like a little kid again. Pretty much every post of yours is the same. Try watching a game as a neutral observer.

Who do you think was the best player on the court in this game? Buford, Sullinger, Diebler all had a nice stretch at one point, but none had the impact that Morris did. I'm guessing he accounted for 2/3 of their points tonight. OSU should learn from this game and have a better gameplan in Columbus

Wtf is "studder?"

And lol @ posting "try watching the game as a neutral observer" after your post.

This just in: 30 out of 30 NBA GMs would take Sullinger over Morris.
Jan 13, 2011 12:40am
Q

queencitybuckeye

Senior Member

7,117 posts
Jan 13, 2011 6:09 AM
dave;636590 wrote: OSU should learn from this game and have a better gameplan in Columbus

The most important word in sports is "at". At Ohio State, the Bucks will blow these guys out by 20+.
Jan 13, 2011 6:09am
C

centralbucksfan

Senior Member

5,111 posts
Jan 13, 2011 8:03 AM
Well, OSU hangs on for a win. Got their typical little spurt in second half to get a decent lead. Like to see them be able to keep those leads/extend them. Good thing about tonites game is that Sullinger probably played his worst game of the year, and others stepped up. Still a little concerned with the defense. Too much penetration and open looks from 3 as well. They look great in spurts defensively, but seem to fall asleep at times. I really thought they would roll in this game. Give Mich credit, they looked better then they did vs Kansas. OSU did what they needed to do on the road. Being #2 (maybe #1), we have to realize that OSU is going to take everyone's best shot nite in and nite out. Can't evey complain about being 17-0.
Jan 13, 2011 8:03am
Heretic's avatar

Heretic

Son of the Sun

18,820 posts
Jan 13, 2011 3:24 PM
dave;636590 wrote:What a surprise, whining like a little kid again. Pretty much every post of yours is the same. Try watching a game as a neutral observer.

Who do you think was the best player on the court in this game? Buford, Sullinger, Diebler all had a nice stretch at one point, but none had the impact that Morris did. I'm guessing he accounted for 2/3 of their points tonight. OSU should learn from this game and have a better gameplan in Columbus

If 2/3 equals 25 percent (18 of 64), you are correct! He had a good game, but wasn't this game-changing dominator. 8/15 from the field, 0-3 from three-point range. Eight assists was very good, but also had five turnovers.
Jan 13, 2011 3:24pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Jan 13, 2011 4:08 PM
dave;636537 wrote:Morris was the best player on the court. He was a little cocky but it was at key times trying to get the crowd into it

the kid's another selfish, look at me player--typical for tsun....and one of the main reasons why OSU is 17-0 and they are 11-6
Jan 13, 2011 4:08pm
W

wkfan

Senior Member

1,641 posts
Jan 13, 2011 4:14 PM
dave;636537 wrote:Morris was the biggest dooosh on the court.
FIFY
Jan 13, 2011 4:14pm
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Jan 13, 2011 6:38 PM
vball10set;637260 wrote:the kid's another selfish, look at me player--typical for tsun....and one of the main reasons why OSU is 17-0 and they are 11-6

Lol name some more selfish cocky look at me players that Michigan supposedly has? I mean seriously.

The reason that osu is 17-0 and Michigan is 11-6 is talent level all around, not because UM players are cocky or selfish. And selfish players generally dont have 8 assists, just sayin
Jan 13, 2011 6:38pm
CinciX12's avatar

CinciX12

Senior Member

2,874 posts
Jan 13, 2011 7:13 PM
Lets just chalk this game up to a rivalry game where everything leading up to it didn't matter. Because if not, there are a few negatives.
Jan 13, 2011 7:13pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Jan 13, 2011 7:22 PM
Hb31187;637409 wrote: The reason that osu is 17-0 and Michigan is 11-6 is talent level all around

tsun, like any number of teams around the country, has plenty of talent--it's just that they just haven't figured out the "unselfish" part of it yet, and that's been a big ingredient of OSU's success
Jan 13, 2011 7:22pm
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Jan 13, 2011 8:49 PM
So how exactly do they play "selfish"?

And if you think that OSU would be JUST as successful with talent equivalent to UM....then you're joking yourself
Jan 13, 2011 8:49pm
Jester's avatar

Jester

Valedictorian Hater

700 posts
Jan 13, 2011 11:26 PM
vball10set;637436 wrote:tsun, like any number of teams around the country, has plenty of talent--it's just that they just haven't figured out the "unselfish" part of it yet, and that's been a big ingredient of OSU's success
So are you trying to say if Michigan payed unselfish like OSU does, then their record would be at or near Ohio State's?

Sorry, not buying it.

Technically, yes, every team has "talent", but the level of talent at a school like Michigan is much less than the top teams in the nation. I'm gonna go ahead and guess that they're playing people that would hardly see the floor for teams like Duke, OSU, Kansas, etc.
Jan 13, 2011 11:26pm
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Jan 14, 2011 2:30 AM
vball10set;637436 wrote:tsun, like any number of teams around the country, has plenty of talent--it's just that they just haven't figured out the "unselfish" part of it yet, and that's been a big ingredient of OSU's success
ALSO, name a talented team who starts a 5th year senior who has started for 3 years, a Senior who has started for 4 years, a Senior who has started for 2 years, a Junior who has started for 3 years and the best Freshman in the country. Talent, EXPERIENCE, good defenders and a TEAM that patiently looks for the best shot, regardless of the player, in their half court offense.
Jan 14, 2011 2:30am
Heretic's avatar

Heretic

Son of the Sun

18,820 posts
Jan 14, 2011 4:05 PM
vball10set;637436 wrote:tsun, like any number of teams around the country, has plenty of talent--it's just that they just haven't figured out the "unselfish" part of it yet, and that's been a big ingredient of OSU's success

I'd say part of it is more them learning to play together, as opposed to "selfishness". They lost Manny Harris and graduated Sims, who were their two main guys last year. I thought they'd be pretty crappy this year, but they've shown the ability to compete with very good teams...they just need to learn how to come together to win those games.
Jan 14, 2011 4:05pm