Yeah I'm kinda irritated I have to miss my first day of classes next quarter to broadcast the game. I only have class Tuesday/Thursday so luckily I won't miss class that Wednesday driving back.

It will be interesting to see what the OSU offense does in this game.

Obviously its always been a heavy dose of the running game come November for the Buckeyes the last couple years. But Pryor was unleashed last season against Oregon and I think the talent is better around him this year on offense.

I'd expect different packages to get Saine in open space with the passing game and some looks to get Brown the ball also in open space.

The defensive line just needs to get some pressure on Mallet. I don't think the secondary is terrible but they aren't the best part of the team. They make the big plays when needed but our line hasn't really gotten the type of pressure that is needed.

devil1197;590119 wrote:It will be interesting to see what the OSU offense does in this game.

Obviously its always been a heavy dose of the running game come November for the Buckeyes the last couple years. But Pryor was unleashed last season against Oregon and I think the talent is better around him this year on offense.

I'd expect different packages to get Saine in open space with the passing game and some looks to get Brown the ball also in open space.

The defensive line just needs to get some pressure on Mallet. I don't think the secondary is terrible but they aren't the best part of the team. They make the big plays when needed but our line hasn't really gotten the type of pressure that is needed.

I really hope the D is aggressive and blitzes alot early. They have to make Mallet go through his reads under pressure, as he's shown to not be a great decision maker under pressure. I have faith that the OSU defense will hold down Arkansas pretty well.

I look for OSU to score more points than Arkansas, thus giving the Buckeyes the edge.

centralbucksfan;589844 wrote: As someone above said, besides Auburn, Arkansas is easily the second best SEC team.

Yeah, OK. I see you are trying to blow up this game to make it look like a great game and a great win over a top notch team if you win.
The SEC's 2-4 are pretty even (Ark, LSU, Bama). And if you really look at the season, Auburn is not much better than these 3 teams either. They just had perfect luck when they needed it.
I think OSU wins this game and would of had a closer/tougher game vs. LSU and Bama.

cats gone wild;590340 wrote:Yeah, OK. I see you are trying to blow up this game to make it look like a great game and a great win over a top notch team if you win.
The SEC's 2-4 are pretty even (Ark, LSU, Bama). And if you really look at the season, Auburn is not much better than these 3 teams either. They just had perfect luck when they needed it.
I think OSU wins this game and would of had a closer/tougher game vs. LSU and Bama.

translation:

LOL...Arkansas is middle of the road in the SEC

ytownfootball;590347 wrote:translation:

LOL...Arkansas is middle of the road in the SEC

Didnt know 2-4 is in the middle of 12 teams. Where did you go to school?

cats gone wild;590340 wrote:Yeah, OK. I see you are trying to blow up this game to make it look like a great game and a great win over a top notch team if you win.
The SEC's 2-4 are pretty even (Ark, LSU, Bama). And if you really look at the season, Auburn is not much better than these 3 teams either. They just had perfect luck when they needed it.
I think OSU wins this game and would of had a closer/tougher game vs. LSU and Bama.

Not trying to blow the game p at all. It doesn't need that when its already arguably the second best mathup next to the title game. I believe Ark beat LSU and I believe Ark has a QB..something LSU doesn't. As I said, if LSU had any kind of body behind the center...I think they would be very good. But they don't. I honestly think OSU would have handled LSU as LSU would have had a hard time coming by points vs a decent defense(something not many SEC teams have this year BTW/. I was sercretly wishing it was LSU as I think OSU had a better chance vs LSU, as I mentioned above. Bama with 3 losses isn't even worth discussing to be honest. I think Arkansas has a better chance of beating OSU than either of those two teams. But SPIN as you choose..you will anyway.

cats gone wild;590352 wrote:Didnt know 2-4 is in the middle of 12 teams. Where did you go to school?

Arkansas is the "worst" of that bunch as you clearly stated...

and would of had a closer/tougher game vs. LSU and Bama.

and of course Auburn goes without saying



Ark. is 8th in the polls so you basically fail

centralbucksfan;590354 wrote:Not trying to blow the game p at all. It doesn't need that when its already arguably the second best mathup next to the title game. I believe Ark beat LSU and I believe Ark has a QB..something LSU doesn't. As I said, if LSU had any kind of body behind the center...I think they would be very good. But they don't. I honestly think OSU would have handled LSU as LSU would have had a hard time coming by points vs a decent defense(something not many SEC teams have this year BTW/. I was sercretly wishing it was LSU as I think OSU had a better chance vs LSU, as I mentioned above. Bama with 3 losses isn't even worth discussing to be honest. I think Arkansas has a better chance of beating OSU than either of those two teams. But SPIN as you choose..you will anyway.

It doesnt matter if Arky beat LSU, didnt Bama beat Arkansas? Different teams play different against different teams. LSU is more talented than both, but played horrible vs. Ark at Ark. If it was at LSU or neutral, LSU would of probably won. I was hoping for a LSU/OSU game. I think LSU would of gave them a better game. LSU prepares better than most teams with a bye week or a month off.
OSU would handle LSU? Laughable. Just like you handled Iowa and Illinois, right? What has OSU proved this year besides not beating a single ranked team in which LSU beat 3 ranked teams? You can say whatever you want about OSU's defense, but you gotta play real teams for your defense to be tested. Example, OSU had #1 defense in 2007 against a pitiful schedule (like this year), and LSU layed 38 points on the bucks.

I love these SEC shills who want to see their teams play AT HOME and then act like it's not an advantage.

LSU laid points on a very young OSU team when they played, and much of it was because of self inflicted wounds by Ohio State (penalties being the largest gift).

Oh and did I mention that game as AT HOME for LSU?

Put LSU in a neutral setting and they haven't won a national title in their entire history.

cats gone wild;590370 wrote:It doesnt matter if Arky beat LSU, didnt Bama beat Arkansas? Different teams play different against different teams. LSU is more talented than both, but played horrible vs. Ark at Ark. If it was at LSU or neutral, LSU would of probably won. I was hoping for a LSU/OSU game. I think LSU would of gave them a better game. LSU prepares better than most teams with a bye week or a month off.
OSU would handle LSU? Laughable. Just like you handled Iowa and Illinois, right? What has OSU proved this year besides not beating a single ranked team in which LSU beat 3 ranked teams? You can say whatever you want about OSU's defense, but you gotta play real teams for your defense to be tested. Example, OSU had #1 defense in 2007 against a pitiful schedule (like this year), and LSU layed 38 points on the bucks.

Mistake #1...Ark beat LSU, period. Game over, you lost. Ark proved they were better, period. If you want to argue this, then I will argue the 2007 title game basically played on your home field. You can't have it both ways. So...STFU
Mistake #2. Comparing 2007 to this year. OSU, like LSU..were LUCKY to get in the title game. Any other year, like this year...they probably aren't even ranked in top 10. 2007 was watered down.
And please stop with the schedule crap. Who in the hell did LSU beat that was worth a crap besides Bama, which ended up with 3 losses and out of the top 15. And please don't use UNC or Big East WVU as examples. They are joke and you know it. Your team played two tough teams who scored a combined 55 pts against your vaunted defense and LOST both games. So what difference does the schedule make if you can't win those two games. YOu beat who you should have. OSU beat who they should have as well.
Mistake #3. You STILL not realize just how bad LSU QB's are. Pathetic. And that position is the difference between being a top 5/10 team and one outside the top 10. Which BTW, LSU is NOT.

Enjoy your NON BCS game for the second consecutive year.

cats gone wild;590370 wrote:It doesnt matter if Arky beat LSU, didnt Bama beat Arkansas? Different teams play different against different teams. LSU is more talented than both, but played horrible vs. Ark at Ark. If it was at LSU or neutral, LSU would of probably won. I was hoping for a LSU/OSU game. I think LSU would of gave them a better game. LSU prepares better than most teams with a bye week or a month off.
OSU would handle LSU? Laughable. Just like you handled Iowa and Illinois, right? What has OSU proved this year besides not beating a single ranked team in which LSU beat 3 ranked teams? You can say whatever you want about OSU's defense, but you gotta play real teams for your defense to be tested. Example, OSU had #1 defense in 2007 against a pitiful schedule (like this year), and LSU layed 38 points on the bucks.

why are you still here? you were asked to leave nicely, now....GTFO!!!

Writerbuckeye;590432 wrote:I love these SEC shills who want to see their teams play AT HOME and then act like it's not an advantage.

LSU laid points on a very young OSU team when they played, and much of it was because of self inflicted wounds by Ohio State (penalties being the largest gift).

Oh and did I mention that game as AT HOME for LSU?

Put LSU in a neutral setting and they haven't won a national title in their entire history.

It also didn't help that Boeckman was in the beginning stages of his meltdown. Towards the end of that season he really started playing poorly and continued until he was finally unseated after the USC game. I remember he got interviewed one time and said that it was beginning to seem like their were 13-14 defenders on the field.

believer;589798 wrote:The BAD

1. This is OSU vs. SEC (even if it is Arkansas)...that's always been a bad omen. OSU hasn't beaten an SEC team since September 1988 and have never won a bowl game vs. an SEC team. Maybe this year the Buckeyes can get that SEC monkey off their backs.
2. There's way too much time to prepare for this one. These extended layoff's have never been a good thing for the Tressel-coached Buckeyes. I love Tress...just sayin'.

Really? He has a national title and 4 BCS wins and a winning bowl record.

Writerbuckeye;590010 wrote:Oh and I'd just like to add: I HATE how the bowl games are all spread out now. Jan. 4th? Ridiculous. You've got a holiday on a weekend, play them ALL over that those four days (Friday to Monday) and be done with it.

Money, money, money.

jordo212000;590044 wrote:This would be a glorified home game for LSU. I still like their players moreso than Arkansas's. LSU is loaded with talent and you never know what Les Miles is going to do

I think sometime even Les Miles doesn't know what he is going to do.

centralbucksfan;590443 wrote:Mistake #1...Ark beat LSU, period. Game over, you lost. Ark proved they were better, period. If you want to argue this, then I will argue the 2007 title game basically played on your home field. You can't have it both ways. So...STFU
Mistake #2. Comparing 2007 to this year. OSU, like LSU..were LUCKY to get in the title game. Any other year, like this year...they probably aren't even ranked in top 10. 2007 was watered down.
And please stop with the schedule crap. Who in the hell did LSU beat that was worth a crap besides Bama, which ended up with 3 losses and out of the top 15. And please don't use UNC or Big East WVU as examples. They are joke and you know it. Your team played two tough teams who scored a combined 55 pts against your vaunted defense and LOST both games. So what difference does the schedule make if you can't win those two games. YOu beat who you should have. OSU beat who they should have as well.
Mistake #3. You STILL not realize just how bad LSU QB's are. Pathetic. And that position is the difference between being a top 5/10 team and one outside the top 10. Which BTW, LSU is NOT.

Enjoy your NON BCS game for the second consecutive year.

*Seriously, this post makes me laugh. Congrats on your best win against Iowa (who got beat by Minnesota) and for getting destroyed by the only ranked team you played!
*LSU wouldnt of been ranked top 10 in 2007 on any normal year?.......ROGL!
*LSU beat Bama, UF, Miss. St, UNC, WVU (3 still ranked, beat the last 2 title teams) compared to OSU beating Miami, PSU, and Iowa (all unranked).
*LSU lost to the #1 and #8 teams on the road by one touchdown each on a huge play (one play complete stupidity when they allowed Ark to throw a 80 yard bomb with 6 seconds to go before half (so I dont know why you act like Ark is clearly better)), while OSU lost to Wisconsin badly before Wisconsin
*Where did I say that the LSU QB's are good? Ive always said we would be a top team if we had a middle of the pack QB.
*You might want to look at the BCS poll (you know, the one that matters) LSU is ranked in the top 10.
*OSU got into a BCS game because of the money factor. Thats a big reason why. MSU should of been there since they beat the team that WAXED osu. LSU cant help it they play a BRUTAL schedule with 5+ ranked teams every year while OSU plays little sisters of the poor every year. Who in the top 15 wouldnt of went through OSU's schedule with 1 loss? Every single one of them could of done it. So, OSU did not prove nothing.
*If you think OSU is so good and belong in BCS games, then why dont you post OSU's record vs. Top 10 teams from 2006 till 2010. They get exposed constantly.
*And to the two saying LSU won on their home field??????...............ROGL! I didnt know 80+ miles away on a total different field that they never play on is a home game.
Also, congrats on winning 0 championships since 2003 while LSU has 2. And, Im sure next year like every year "OSU will win the title this year and Pryor will get a Heisman"...........yeah, sure.

cats gone wild;590870 wrote: *OSU got into a BCS game because of the money factor. Thats the ONLY reason why. MSU should of been there since they beat the team that WAXED osu.

I tried to read your horribly organized post after this.

OSU also beat the team (Iowa) that WAXED Michigan State.

cats gone wild;590870 wrote:*Seriously, this post makes me laugh. Congrats on your best win against Iowa (who got beat by Minnesota) and for getting destroyed by the only ranked team you played!
*LSU wouldnt of been ranked top 10 in 2007 on any normal year?.......ROGL!
*LSU beat Bama, UF, Miss. St, UNC, WVU (3 still ranked, beat the last 2 title teams) compared to OSU beating Miami, PSU, and Iowa (all unranked).

The only team I'd take over Miami, PSU and Iowa is Bama. Are you really trying to use UNC (who had half the team suspended for that game and LSU was still lucky to win), WVU, Miss. St and a 5 loss Florida as great wins?

cats gone wild;590870 wrote:
*Where did I say that the LSU QB's are good? Ive always said we would be a top team if we had a middle of the pack QB.
*You might want to look at the BCS poll (you know, the one that matters) LSU is ranked in the top 10.

Wait, if we are looking at the poll that matters then let's look at who is ranked higher. Ohio State is 6th, jackass.

cats gone wild;590870 wrote: *OSU got into a BCS game because of the money factor. Thats the ONLY reason why. MSU should of been there since they beat the team that WAXED osu. LSU cant help it they play a BRUTAL schedule with 5+ ranked teams every year while OSU plays little sisters of the poor every year. Who in the top 15 wouldnt of went through OSU's schedule with 1 loss? Every single one of them could of done it. So, OSU did not prove nothing.

Your opinion proves nothing, Ohio State proved they are BCS worthy. Also, MSU beat Wisky who beat OSU (I wouldn't say that waxed them, it was convincing though) but OSU beat Iowa who did WAX MSU 37-6. OSU got into the BCS over MSU, not only because of money, but because they are the better team. MSU looked unimpressive against mediocore teams like Purdue, Northwestern and Penn St. (just as LSU looked unimpressive against Tennessee, lucky to have beat them and UNC).

cats gone wild;590870 wrote:**If you think OSU is so good and belong in BCS games, then why dont you post OSU's record vs. Top 10 teams from 2006 till 2010. They get exposed constantly.

Really? Exposed constantly? You really are a dumbass. In 2006 they beat the #2 team twice (Michigan and Texas). So in 2006 OSU's record was 2-1 against top 10 teams (loss to Florida). 2007 the only top 10 team they played was LSU and they lost, taking the total to 2-2. In 2008 they lost 3 top 10 teams, 2-5. In 2009 they were 3-1 agaisnt top 10 teams (wins against Iowa, Oregon and Penn ST.; loss to USC), bringing the total to 5-6. Is that getting exposed?

I forgot to add that they were 1-1 this season against top 10 opponents. (Miami and Wisconsin). I used rankings when the teams met.

cats gone wild;590870 wrote:*
*And to the two saying LSU won on their home field??????...............ROGL! I didnt know 80+ miles away on a total different field that they never play on is a home game.
Also, congrats on winning 0 championships since 2003 while LSU has 2. And, Im sure next year like every year "OSU will win the title this year and Pryor will get a Heisman"...........yeah, sure.

Why do you like using arbitrary years to support your data? You want to talk all-time? You can't because your program doesn't measure up to the Buckeyes.

ROGL!!!!11

It's pretty obvious cats isn't here to talk up the Cotton Bowl and LSU's appearance against Penn State, you know, like what most fans do. He's here to talk shit about Ohio State.

You need someone to start a thread for a non-BCS game between LSU and Penn State?

ytownfootball;590923 wrote:It's pretty obvious cats isn't here to talk up the Cotton Bowl and LSU's appearance against Penn State, you know, like what most fans do. He's here to talk shit about Ohio State.

You need someone to start a thread for a non-BCS game between LSU and Penn State?

It's quite pathetic isn't it? Its an obsession and border line creepy.

ytownfootball;590923 wrote:It's pretty obvious cats isn't here to talk up the Cotton Bowl and LSU's appearance against Penn State, you know, like what most fans do. He's here to talk **** about Ohio State.

You need someone to start a thread for a non-BCS game between LSU and Penn State?

Hey dummy, LSU plays Texas A&M in the Cotton Bowl.

cats gone wild;590955 wrote:Hey dummy, LSU plays Texas A&M in the Cotton Bowl.

no shit...start a thread lol

Im alright, you started a great thread for the cotton bowl, lol.

Arkansas is a good SEC team. Good SEC team vs any other conference champ=SEC winner. Whats new fuck fucking fuckers. The SEC owns you. LSU even owns you. You're the SEC's bitch.