~U~;583776 wrote:Life on another planet = End of religion.
100% false and naive at best.
~U~;583776 wrote:Life on another planet = End of religion.
O-Trap;584884 wrote:Back to the topic, the problem is that by the orderly study of only the natural and physical universe (ie "science") alone, one can neither prove nor disprove an entity that, by its very definition, supersedes said universe. Thus, alien life ... life that still exists within, and is controlled by, the physical and natural laws that control our universe ... does nothing less or more to prove or disprove the existence of a sentient, supernatural entity that may have purposefully created it, and therefore exists outside its boundaries.
Zunardo;584971 wrote:Irrelevant conclusion?
Heretic;585035 wrote:Any biology textbook that doesn't mention grilled cheese sandwiches is pure bullshit!
This, of course, is a valid point, and I'm shocked that it needs to be made so consistently on the OC.O-Trap;584959 wrote:If a book, argument, statement, etc. doesn't speak to a topic, then OF COURSE it's not going to mention it.
What he said is the equivalent of me saying that because a Trig textbook doesn't mention splitting the atom, then the textbook must be dismissed as invalid.
Now, the merits of a book, statement, argument, etc. are to be logically evaluated on what they DO address, not on what they don't.
DeyDurkie5;585087 wrote:I would love to see religion dis-proved in my lifetime...be awesome to see everyone's faces when their jebus was actually just a skilled carpenter and master blunt roller
O-Trap;585138 wrote:So is it religion you're wanting to see disproved or just Christianity?
DeyDurkie5;585087 wrote:I would love to see religion dis-proved in my lifetime...be awesome to see everyone's faces when their jebus was actually just a skilled carpenter and master blunt roller
DeyDurkie5;585087 wrote:I would love to see religion dis-proved in my lifetime...be awesome to see everyone's faces when their jebus was actually just a skilled carpenter and master blunt roller
fan_from_texas;585153 wrote:What sort of proof would you need to disprove religion? Proving a negative always strikes me as a tall order.
Isn't it funny that these things take place everyday by god fearing people?SnotBubbles;585143 wrote:That would be great for the world (sarcasm). That's one of the most ignorant comments I've ever read on here. I don't know what I believe, but that comment still irritates the shit out of me. The Christian religion is what this country was founded on, it's teachings are what we base law on. Let's disprove something that teaches morals and values and scares people out of doing harmful things. You're right, I would love to see science induced panic throughout the world...murders, thefts, rapes...and it would all happen because man no longer has to fear God's ultimate wrath. Even if there is no God, the belief in him is one of the good qualities left in this world.
As for your comment, you better hope that you're right and God isn't real. If he is, you're fucked. I'm not going to say I believe myself, but I'm certainly not going to mock it/Him.
SnotBubbles;585143 wrote:That would be great for the world (sarcasm). That's one of the most ignorant comments I've ever read on here. I don't know what I believe, but that comment still irritates the shit out of me. The Christian religion is what this country was founded on, it's teachings are what we base law on. Let's disprove something that teaches morals and values and scares people out of doing harmful things. You're right, I would love to see science induced panic throughout the world...murders, thefts, rapes...and it would all happen because man no longer has to fear God's ultimate wrath. Even if there is no God, the belief in him is one of the good qualities left in this world.
As for your comment, you better hope that you're right and God isn't real. If he is, you're fucked. I'm not going to say I believe myself, but I'm certainly not going to mock it/Him.
mcburg93;585159 wrote:nasa finds new microbe to help discover stuff in space lol
http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2010/12/02/NASA_scientists_discover_extreme_microbe.html
O-Trap;585158 wrote:Nevermind the fact that, as I mentioned before, we don't have access to the necessary facts or data to disprove something that exists above that which we CAN prove/disprove.
Bigred1995;585163 wrote:Isn't it funny that these things take place everyday by god fearing people?
Your entire post is a joke and reek of ignorance!
I don't think you give enough credit to your fellow humans. Morality is more of an evolutionary product than a religious one.SnotBubbles;585208 wrote:I'm talking about the magnitude and prevalence of the occurrences. It happens, but what the Bible and other religious scripts (in most cases) have taught scare people away from doing it more frequently. If God was disproved completely, by science, the entire world would revolt. You wouldn't want to walk out your door. No military or law enforcement would be strong enough to stop it. Call it ignorance, I call it logic. Again, this is coming from a person who as of right now, does not believe. Most religions are good things which teach peace and values.
It would be like trying to take a t-bone away from a starved, rabbinic dog. You're fine as long as you leave it alone. Reach your hand in there to take it away and you're going to get bit.
Bigred1995;585211 wrote:I don't think you give enough credit to your fellow humans. Morality is more of an evolutionary product than a religious one.
I did learn something from this last post though! Don't try and take food from Jewish dogs!!! LOL

Bigred1995;585211 wrote:I don't think you give enough credit to your fellow humans. Morality is more of an evolutionary product than a religious one.
I did learn something from this last post though! Don't try and take food from Jewish dogs!!! LOL
jmog;585221 wrote:I don't know, there are a few logical proofs I've seen that says morals can NOT come from evolution or a naturalistic worldview.
I could dig it up, and I haven't researched it extensively to see if there is any fallacy in the proof, but just a thought to ponder.