DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Nov 23, 2010 5:46pm
Commander of Awesome;572784 wrote:I actually agree, I'm shocked.
I tend to be right a lot, so don't be so shocked next time
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 24, 2010 9:14am
Commander of Awesome;572637 wrote:Nice FAIL, as I listed the panthers, and its the panthers thread lolfail. Stick to soccer and let the men who played/know football talk about it.
Uhh..you edited your post dumbass. You had Jags in there, don't lie.
Writerbuckeye
Posts: 4,745
Nov 24, 2010 12:08pm
Now there are reports coming out that McCoy, in fact. does have the dreaded high ankle sprain and may be out for a while. The rumors are not and heavy with some reports saying it's not as bad as the ones Wallace and Delhomme had, so it may only be a week or two -- while other reports are saying 4-5 weeks.
I'd love to know the last NFL team that lost three quarterbacks to essentially the same injury.
Only in Cleveland.
I'd love to know the last NFL team that lost three quarterbacks to essentially the same injury.
Only in Cleveland.
Art Modell
Posts: 2,338
Nov 24, 2010 12:13pm
royal_k;572822 wrote:Get your fucking garbage back to the pittspuke threads.
Don't watch the game. We don't care.
Why the fuck would I watch this fiasco?
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Nov 24, 2010 12:17pm
Writerbuckeye;573900 wrote:Now there are reports coming out that McCoy, in fact. does have the dreaded high ankle sprain and may be out for a while. The rumors are not and heavy with some reports saying it's not as bad as the ones Wallace and Delhomme had, so it may only be a week or two -- while other reports are saying 4-5 weeks.
I'd love to know the last NFL team that lost three quarterbacks to essentially the same injury.
Only in Cleveland.
They just said on the news that Dellhomme has taken a majority of the snaps thus far this week. Damnit. The news made it sound like it would only be a week or so for McCoy.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 24, 2010 12:21pm
what a terrible game
1-9 team at 3-7 team
starting QBs likely Jimmy Clausen and Jake Delhomme
Fox announcers Chris Rose and Torry Holt
1-9 team at 3-7 team
starting QBs likely Jimmy Clausen and Jake Delhomme
Fox announcers Chris Rose and Torry Holt
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Nov 24, 2010 12:51pm
Non;573928 wrote:what a terrible game
1-9 team at 3-7 team
starting QBs likely Jimmy Clausen and Jake Delhomme
Fox announcers Chris Rose and Torry Holt
http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/threads/19761-Week-12-Pittsburgh-Steelers-%287-3%29-at-Buffalo-Bills-%282-8%29
Writerbuckeye
Posts: 4,745
Nov 24, 2010 1:56pm
Why do these Stooler fans keep popping up on Cleveland threads.
Are they bored with Rapistburger, already. Perhaps he needs to go out and expose himself in another seedy bar's bathroom down South -- where the toothless hilljacks make him feel like he's back in Pittsburgh.
Are they bored with Rapistburger, already. Perhaps he needs to go out and expose himself in another seedy bar's bathroom down South -- where the toothless hilljacks make him feel like he's back in Pittsburgh.
Fab4Runner
Posts: 6,196
Nov 24, 2010 2:01pm
Non;573928 wrote:what a terrible game
1-9 team at 3-7 team
starting QBs likely Jimmy Clausen and Jake Delhomme
Fox announcers Chris Rose and Torry Holt
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Nov 24, 2010 2:04pm
ESPN just reported that Delhomme will start Sunday.*
*This post was to inform, not to bash or troll.
*This post was to inform, not to bash or troll.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Nov 24, 2010 2:23pm
^^^haha....love that there has to be a note
Anyhow, Delhomme starting = a better shot of getting AJ Green next year...lol
Anyhow, Delhomme starting = a better shot of getting AJ Green next year...lol
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Nov 24, 2010 2:54pm
Non;573928 wrote:what a terrible game
1-9 team at 3-7 team
starting QBs likely Jimmy Clausen and Jake Delhomme
Fox announcers Chris Rose and Torry Holt
Great insight. Once again you provide absolute shit to a Cleveland thread. Congrats.
royal_k
Posts: 4,423
Nov 24, 2010 3:26pm
wes_mantooth;574136 wrote:^^^haha....love that there has to be a note
Anyhow, Delhomme starting = a better shot of getting AJ Green next year...lol
Good point....he's gonna be a top 5 pick. With Colt starting, we won't be picking there.
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Nov 24, 2010 11:44pm
wes_mantooth;574136 wrote:^^^haha....love that there has to be a note
Anyhow, Delhomme starting = a better shot of getting AJ Green next year...lol
Delhomme starting = me blacked out by the end of the first quarter, along with everyone else in my section.
Go4alOngbOmB
Posts: 673
Nov 25, 2010 3:01am
YEa...Jake is starting? Ughh....ummm....so I have these great seats in Section 134 row 7....any takers?
Maybe the worst news I could have heard ALL WEEK.
I went from confident in winning to puking my guts out in agony in less than 20 seconds...awesome....
Maybe the worst news I could have heard ALL WEEK.
I went from confident in winning to puking my guts out in agony in less than 20 seconds...awesome....
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Nov 25, 2010 10:55am
ts1227;574823 wrote:Delhomme starting = me blacked out by the end of the first quarter, along with everyone else in my section.
Go to the muni lot before the game and try this.....
[video=youtube;XNtTEibFvlQ][/video]
Problem solved.
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Nov 26, 2010 9:43am
Can't believe Delhomme is starting. That may actually mean a victory for Carolina.
dazedconfused
Posts: 2,662
Nov 26, 2010 12:58pm
i think i'd rather start mangini than delhomme
Art Modell
Posts: 2,338
Nov 26, 2010 3:25pm
Hopefully Goodell bans this game from being shown on tv.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Nov 26, 2010 3:39pm
Art Modell;575933 wrote:Hopefully Goodell bans this game from being shown on tv.
do you make up your signatures? cause if so that's fucking retarded
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Nov 26, 2010 4:24pm
DeyDurkie5;575949 wrote:do you make up your signatures? cause if so that's fucking retarded
He does. I am glad you pointed that out, because I noticed it as well.
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Nov 26, 2010 6:12pm
DeyDurkie5;575949 wrote:do you make up your signatures? cause if so that's fucking retarded
He does (make own sigs) and is (fucking retarded). Well, technically, it originally was "pussies" instead of "sissies", but there are rules against profane sigs, locations, etc., so they don't bleed through to the cleaner HS forums. Not that changing one word to another suddenly would make his sig the work of a Harvard scholar or anything...
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Nov 26, 2010 6:15pm
FAILhomme? SMH, I guess we don't want to win. Seneca Wallace gives us the best chance to win.
Art Modell
Posts: 2,338
Nov 26, 2010 7:34pm
I wonder if Delhomme is ''fired up'' to play against his old team? Should be a good one.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Nov 27, 2010 10:54pm
Heres to hoping Jake FAILhomme doesn't throw an INT for TD tomorrow! I wish Wallace was starting instead of him.