justincredible;561950 wrote:Nope, huge fine and/or jail time.
I Wear Pants;561952 wrote:It's because we keep allowing them to inch in on things like this.
When is something that they say is for our safety too much?
I Wear Pants;561952 wrote:It's because we keep allowing them to inch in on things like this.
When is something that they say is for our safety too much?
They should use dogs and nothing gets changed if you don't say "hey, this is ridiculous."Fab1b;561943 wrote:Pants I also get that dogs are more effective but they aren't using dogs, they are using humans for the time being. People crying about it in the media isn't going to change that. They will just kick your ass out the airport and move on to the next search. Again I don't want anyone thinking I am for this, I am just saying it's their rules I have to play by them if I want to fly.
Fab1b;561975 wrote:I am sure there will be lawsuits to come, there always are!
justincredible;561871 wrote:I could care less about someone seeing my dong on an xray screen or some dude giving me a pat down but I find the whole process to be, as I Wear Pants said, bullshit.
tk421;561982 wrote:You know, I bet we'd get a lot more efficient and non invasive security a la Israel if our government employees in D.C. and their families had to be subjected to the same types of screening that the regular citizens get.
redfalcon;561983 wrote:My sentiments exactly. I've done the full body screen. Its nothing, I don't understand why anyone has a problem with it.
Fab1b;561992 wrote:Well regular citizens don't have that luxery in $$ or govt funded private transport.
tk421;561997 wrote:Government employees except the President should be treated exactly the same as us. That bitch Napolitano or whatever her name is has probably never gone through a security screening in an airport in her life.
tk421;561993 wrote:You wouldn't mind your teenage daughter's scan image being put on the internet?
redfalcon;562005 wrote:Look at the images. You can hardly tell if they are male or female, and there is no way to see any facial features.
tk421;562012 wrote:This is from leaked images from a scanner at a courthouse that uses the less detailed resolution. Imagine your daughter's images being saved and leaked online, despite assurances from the government that absolutely no images are saved, in even higher and greater detail. This would still be okay with you? We've seen that the government does store these images and they are leaked online. As you can clearly see, without the face being blocked out everyone would know who this guy is. This is still not a privacy concern for you?
Screw the dogs, all you need are properly trained people and questioning. Israel employs no scanners or dogs. I have absolutely no idea why we don't have some of their security people telling the TSA how to operate. Actually, I do. It's all about the money. Want to guess how many high level government people have their hands dipped into the scanner technology money pie?I Wear Pants;562019 wrote:What kind of scan does this use? Is it something that increases cancer risk because I'd be wary of that if I traveled a lot.
What is the argument for this when dogs are more effective?
tk421;562022 wrote:Screw the dogs, all you need are properly trained people and questioning. Israel employs no scanners or dogs. I have absolutely no idea why we don't have some of their security people telling the TSA how to operate. Actually, I do. It's all about the money. Want to guess how many high level government people have their hands dipped into the scanner technology money pie?
tk421;562022 wrote:Screw the dogs, all you need are properly trained people and questioning. Israel employs no scanners or dogs. I have absolutely no idea why we don't have some of their security people telling the TSA how to operate. Actually, I do. It's all about the money. Want to guess how many high level government people have their hands dipped into the scanner technology money pie?
justincredible;562028 wrote:Israel profiles people. Profiling is bad, right?
