killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Sep 19, 2010 10:53pm
To be clear.Sonofanump;490302 wrote:OK. Then why respond specifically to me.
S
Sonofanump
Sep 19, 2010 10:54pm
karen lotz;490299 wrote:There isn't any video of the WR out of bounds play in that link.
I can not find one either. 7:43 in the 4th.
I'll mark it down here so if I get a copy I will know where in the video to look for the play.
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Sep 19, 2010 11:31pm
IMO, ND and MSU played very equal. The one thing I noticed about ND is that the defense is too slow and they don't wrap up when tackling. I don't know how many times I thought a ball carrier would be tackled and the got extra yards. However, I was more impressed with ND's offense than MSU's, I think it all came down to not being ready for a trick play because these teams were equal overall.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Sep 19, 2010 11:39pm
MSU gained a lot of yards when they got to the edges, not as well when they went up the gut, so yeah, I agree about the speed being a little lacking on D.
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Sep 19, 2010 11:42pm
ytownfootball;490394 wrote:MSU gained a lot of yards when they got to the edges, not as well when they went up the gut, so yeah, I agree about the speed being a little lacking on D.
They did have a few runs up the gut that got some extra yardage because of bad tackling, but you are correct, most the yards were due to getting beat on the edge.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Sep 20, 2010 1:23pm
nothing really to add...just wanted ND posters to see my new signature and gloat some more.
God Sat was beautiful...scUM wins but really loses, ND gets a taste of what they've done for years in SB and AZ takes the starch out of IOWA's shorts.
God Sat was beautiful...scUM wins but really loses, ND gets a taste of what they've done for years in SB and AZ takes the starch out of IOWA's shorts.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 20, 2010 1:24pm
Tiernan;490821 wrote:nothing really to add...
Understatement of the century.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Sep 20, 2010 1:30pm
^^^
now that was actually semi-clever Lotz. Golf-clap for you.
now that was actually semi-clever Lotz. Golf-clap for you.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 20, 2010 3:31pm
hmmmm another non Notre Dame fan questioning the delay of game that wasn't.
http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/it-appeared-spartan-clock-expired-because-it-did-29009
http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/it-appeared-spartan-clock-expired-because-it-did-29009
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Sep 20, 2010 3:32pm
karen lotz;490992 wrote:hmmmm another non Notre Dame fan questioning the delay of game that wasn't.
http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/it-appeared-spartan-clock-expired-because-it-did-29009
LOL your still crying about it....
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 20, 2010 3:36pm
Nope, the link was just posted on twitter.
and it is you're or you are.
and it is you're or you are.
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Sep 20, 2010 4:08pm
karen lotz;490998 wrote:Nope, the link was just posted on twitter.
and it is you're or you are.
Grammar police lol
S
Sonofanump
Sep 20, 2010 5:07pm
What about the referee, who on that particular play had a closer and clearer view of both the play clock and the ball being snapped?
http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/it-appeared-spartan-clock-expired-because-it-did-29009
Maybe because the referee is busy looking at the holder and the kicker, both of which are afforded special protection and have special rules on the play.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 20, 2010 5:19pm
Sonofanump;491086 wrote:Maybe because the referee is busy looking at the holder and the kicker, both of which are afforded special protection and have special rules on the play.
Are they in need of special protection before the ball is snapped?
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 20, 2010 5:20pm
Also, did you get the report from the Big East office yet?
S
Sonofanump
Sep 20, 2010 5:23pm
So you want the referee to have the clock, then snap, the holder and kicker?
S
Sonofanump
Sep 20, 2010 5:24pm
karen lotz;491102 wrote:Also, did you get the report from the Big East office yet?
No, I'll have reviewed the video by Thursday.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 20, 2010 5:26pm
Again what special protection is needed in the split second between the snap and when it would be possible for there to be contact with kicker/holder?
S
Sonofanump
Sep 20, 2010 5:28pm
karen lotz;491110 wrote:Again what special protection is needed in the split second between the snap and when it would be possible for there to be contact with kicker/holder?
Is this the same split second that the backjudge gets to go from clock to snap? I do not agree that it needs changed.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 20, 2010 5:33pm
Backjudge 50 yards away under the goal posts?
hangonsloopy
Posts: 1,291
Sep 20, 2010 5:48pm
http://deadspin.com/5643013/definitive-proof-that-time-expired-before-msus-miracle-and-why-it-doesnt-matter
proof it was at zero and a good explanation of why it didn't matter.
proof it was at zero and a good explanation of why it didn't matter.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Sep 20, 2010 5:52pm
^^^nice attempt, but it won't matter 
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Sep 20, 2010 6:05pm
karen lotz;491113 wrote:Backjudge 50 yards away under the goal posts?
"Back judge"...dumbass learn how to spell!
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 20, 2010 6:08pm
DeyDurkie5;491155 wrote:"Back judge"...dumbass learn how to spell!
Good call, should have caught it in sonofanump's post.
FYI it is dumb ass, not dumbass. Good talk.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 20, 2010 6:09pm
Interesting how every other delay of game gets called properly.hangonsloopy;491132 wrote:http://deadspin.com/5643013/definitive-proof-that-time-expired-before-msus-miracle-and-why-it-doesnt-matter
proof it was at zero and a good explanation of why it didn't matter.