Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Sep 11, 2010 8:56pm
KnightXC1;480298 wrote:ND will be so long as Christ is their QB. Montana was awful and not kicking the FG at the end of the half came back to bite them. Still a terrible throw by Christ on the final play because you have to allow your guys to make a play and he didn't do that.
If Christ was their QB they probably would have won today. I doubt the son of God would throw it out of bounds on the last play of the game.
S
slingshot4ever
Posts: 4,085
Sep 11, 2010 9:05pm
As much as people complain about Kelly not going for a FG, just remember that the refs handed ND a TD but not seeing the guy release the ball before crossing the goall which would have given UM the ball on the 20. The game shouldn't have even been a one possession game if the refs don't miss that call.
S
slingshot4ever
Posts: 4,085
Sep 11, 2010 9:06pm
Mooney44Cards;472240 wrote:Against UConn?
Purdue is better than most people give them credit for.
ND by 10.
Wrong on many levels.
sherm03
Posts: 7,349
Sep 11, 2010 9:12pm
slingshot4ever;480327 wrote:Wrong on many levels.
His prediction may have been wrong based on the circumstances. But I still contend that with Crist in the whole game, ND would have won by 10+.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Sep 11, 2010 9:13pm
slingshot4ever;480326 wrote:As much as people complain about Kelly not going for a FG, just remember that the refs handed ND a TD but not seeing the guy release the ball before crossing the goall which would have given UM the ball on the 20. The game shouldn't have even been a one possession game if the refs don't miss that call.
LMAO. Refs in the WVU-Marshall game missed the same call last night. That's not "handing a TD to a team." Technically it was a missed call but Michigan had already blown the coverage and TJ Jones scores with ease regardless. It would've been a hard lesson learned but it had no effect on the outcome of the game. The damage was done on that play long before that.
S
slingshot4ever
Posts: 4,085
Sep 11, 2010 9:15pm
^^^^^
If the call isn't missed, ND doesn't get that TD. By missing the call, they essentially gave ND a TD. You earn a TD by crossing the goal line with the ball....he didn't do that.
If the call isn't missed, ND doesn't get that TD. By missing the call, they essentially gave ND a TD. You earn a TD by crossing the goal line with the ball....he didn't do that.
sherm03
Posts: 7,349
Sep 11, 2010 9:19pm
There wasn't a white jersey anywhere around on that play. But there were plenty of Blue jerseys.
If they don't signal touchdown on that play...someone else would have jumped on the ball and it still would have been 6. Don't act like that play was a huge deal. Like ewok said...the damage was done.
If they don't signal touchdown on that play...someone else would have jumped on the ball and it still would have been 6. Don't act like that play was a huge deal. Like ewok said...the damage was done.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Sep 11, 2010 9:19pm
slingshot4ever;480350 wrote:^^^^^
If the call isn't missed, ND doesn't get that TD. By missing the call, they essentially gave ND a TD. You earn a TD by crossing the goal line with the ball....he didn't do that.
Okay, man. Whatever you say. The same call was missed last night in the WVU-Marshall game. Did anybody really care? I guess we can argue IF Dayne Crist doesn't get hurt too, right? It is what it is. Michigan already got beat on that play straight up. Therefore, it wasn't a big missed call. If you think it was......you're just reaching.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 11, 2010 9:19pm
slingshot4ever;480350 wrote:^^^^^
If the call isn't missed, ND doesn't get that TD. By missing the call, they essentially gave ND a TD. You earn a TD by crossing the goal line with the ball....he didn't do that.
Yeah? I saw a holding call each time Michigan scored. Refs didn't call it. They gave Michigan all of their points. Good job by Big Ten officiating crew.
CinciX12
Posts: 2,874
Sep 11, 2010 9:26pm
sherm03;480301 wrote:I think Joe needs to take his wife and Nate to Maury for a paternity test. There's no way that kid has his genes with how terribly he played today.
I shit you not +/- 2 words or so I sent a mass text out with that exact statement lol. The consensus agreed.
S
slingshot4ever
Posts: 4,085
Sep 11, 2010 9:28pm
karen lotz;480365 wrote:Yeah? I saw a holding call each time Michigan scored. Refs didn't call it. They gave Michigan all of their points. Good job by Big Ten officiating crew.
I think you have holding confused with good blocking......
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 11, 2010 9:30pm
lol. First off, my post was complete sarcasm. How you can't understand that I don't know. Second, lol.
merv
Posts: 174
Sep 11, 2010 9:37pm
sherm03;480341 wrote:His prediction may have been wrong based on the circumstances. But I still contend that with Crist in the whole game, ND would have won by 10+.
Crist could've thrown another pick, or overthrown 3 more receivers, too. ND by 10+, LOL!! 28-24!!! Go Blue!!!
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Sep 11, 2010 9:41pm
It would've been a big win, but Kelly's got some time to accumulate those. RROD needed that win today. I'm kinda crushed but I *think* better days are ahead under BK. Only time will tell.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Sep 11, 2010 9:46pm
karen lotz;480401 wrote:lol. First off, my post was complete sarcasm. How you can't understand that I don't know. Second, lol.
That was definitely sarcasm. In fact, ND held all day long with no calls.
Ok, I'm going to drink some beer and read your reactions to this.
merv
Posts: 174
Sep 11, 2010 9:53pm
killer_ewok;480414 wrote:It would've been a big win, but Kelly's got some time to accumulate those. RROD needed that win today. I'm kinda crushed but I *think* better days are ahead under BK. Only time will tell.
I would be crushed too. I feel the same as you. Rich Rod NEEDED that win. There will be better days for ND with BK there, 100% agree.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 11, 2010 9:56pm
WebFire;480424 wrote:That was definitely sarcasm. In fact, ND held all day long with no calls.
Ok, I'm going to drink some beer and read your reactions to this.
You clearly don't know what the difference between a hold and quality blocking is do you?
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Sep 11, 2010 10:25pm
merv;480433 wrote:I would be crushed too. I feel the same as you. Rich Rod NEEDED that win. There will be better days for ND with BK there, 100% agree.
Classy response. Appreciate that, Merv.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Sep 11, 2010 10:26pm
karen lotz;480440 wrote:You clearly don't know what the difference between a hold and quality blocking is do you?
I think you are the one confused.
newarkcatholicfan
Posts: 3,199
Sep 11, 2010 10:29pm
Sad to see Michigan played as poorly as they did but a win is a win.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 11, 2010 10:51pm
WebFire;480536 wrote:I think you are the one confused.
I am now? I was mocking slingshot and his responses. My post was 100% sarcastic. I already said that once and you still can't understand? Maybe you should stop drinking.
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Sep 11, 2010 11:10pm
Pick6;473210 wrote:What about it? Michigan looked way more impressive in their win last week, im not saying ND didnt look good..but ill take UM
when you're good,you are good
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Sep 11, 2010 11:25pm
karen lotz;480576 wrote:I am now? I was mocking slingshot and his responses. My post was 100% sarcastic. I already said that once and you still can't understand? Maybe you should stop drinking.
Sorry I wasn't following all the banter.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 11, 2010 11:50pm
No problem.WebFire;480661 wrote:Sorry I wasn't following all the banter.
Trueblue23
Posts: 7,463
Sep 12, 2010 12:53am
I hope RichRod uses these next few games to develop more weapons on offense, we'll need them in Big Ten play.