9/11: Michigan at Notre Dame

College Sports 258 replies 11,198 views
Leonardo's avatar
Leonardo
Posts: 4,986
Sep 5, 2010 1:13am
Both teams looked pretty good in week one.

3:30 on Saturday
dwccrew's avatar
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Sep 5, 2010 1:37am
Nd has the homefield advatage, but Michigan looked more impressive in their win. I'll give the edge to Michigan, but this will be too close to call.
Mooney44Cards's avatar
Mooney44Cards
Posts: 2,754
Sep 5, 2010 2:32am
dwccrew;472230 wrote:Nd has the homefield advatage, but Michigan looked more impressive in their win. I'll give the edge to Michigan, but this will be too close to call.

Against UConn?

Purdue is better than most people give them credit for.

ND by 10.
dwccrew's avatar
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Sep 5, 2010 2:40am
Mooney44Cards;472240 wrote:Against UConn?

Purdue is better than most people give them credit for.

ND by 10.
LOL, Purdue is no better than UConn and yes, Michigan looked more impressive today. I didn't say they were clearly better, I just said they looked more impressive. Calm down.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Sep 5, 2010 8:11am
two pretty evenly matched teams, based on what I saw yesterday- should be a good one....ND by a field goal :cool:
killer_ewok's avatar
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Sep 5, 2010 9:19am
dwccrew;472242 wrote:LOL, Purdue is no better than UConn and yes, Michigan looked more impressive today. I didn't say they were clearly better, I just said they looked more impressive. Calm down.

Serious question....both games were on at the same time and almost every time I changed channels at a commercial during the ND game....the UM-Uconn game was at commercial too. Did you have two TV's going or something?

Anyways, it should be a good game. Marve's mobility gave ND some trouble so containing Robinson has to be goal #1 for the Irish D. I was encouraged by ND's performance. Much more fundamentally sound than under Weis. Better technique, better conditioning, guys were in position. But, it was just one game so let's see if ND can build on that and improve. Michigan will definitely be a test.

GO IRISH!!!
The Equalizer's avatar
The Equalizer
Posts: 1,003
Sep 5, 2010 10:08am
Not sure what happened to ND's offense in the 3rd. I'm sure Kelly will correct that. Defense looked not only solid, but energized. Jesus, Gary Gray had more tackles yesterday than I think in his entire career. Can't wait to see them against better competition. We finally have reason to hope.
CinciX12's avatar
CinciX12
Posts: 2,874
Sep 5, 2010 10:24am
Now children, we all know that Purdue is a FCS team until the week of October 23rd..Lets not forget our place.
Automatik's avatar
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Sep 5, 2010 10:35am
I think ND wins. Their defense looked good yesterday. Robinson will get hit and will make mistakes. 24-20 domers.
H
Hamp89
Posts: 625
Sep 5, 2010 10:40am
killer_ewok;472265 wrote:Serious question....both games were on at the same time and almost every time I changed channels at a commercial during the ND game....the UM-Uconn game was at commercial too. Did you have two TV's going or something?

That's really funny..I was thinking the same thing. As much as I tried checking Michigan out, they were on commercial at the same time as ND throughout the whole game. Unless dwccrew is making his prediction based on ESPN highlights, I'm not sure how you could say that.

Anyway, the Michigan game is always a test regardless of how both teams have played. I'm really looking forward to it. The best part of the game for ND yesterday were absolute question marks every season under Weis: defense and special teams. I am encouraged that the worst part of the Purdue game was that the passsing game was a little out of sync - something we know will get better and Kelly will develop each week.

I'm taking ND over UM 27-20
killer_ewok's avatar
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Sep 5, 2010 10:46am
Yeah, I couldn't be more pleased with Gary Gray's play yesterday. He looked like a different player. Quite a few of his tackles were near the LOS too.

Overall, the defense did a pretty good job. I was disappointed with Te'o though. He missed too many tackles. I mean, it was great to see him flying around looking to make plays but if you're not wrapping the guy up and actually tackling him.....it doesn't mean much.
R
rock_knutne
Sep 5, 2010 11:23am
^^^^Te'o missed a couple tackles but Purdue was looking for him the entire game. What impressed me was the overall defensive effort. As stated above, they were in position and had plenty left in the tank late in the game. Te'o aside, because he's going to be harrased all year, how about Carlo Calabrese? Another big difference was the cornerback play.......last year, those outside running plays went for 10 plus yards it seemed almost every time, that definitely wasn't the case yesterday. Gray and Walls seeled the corner almost every time.
R
rock_knutne
Sep 5, 2010 11:25am
If ND can play solid defense again next week, they have a very good chance to beat Michigan.
Mohican00's avatar
Mohican00
Posts: 3,394
Sep 5, 2010 11:34am
Tough game to call but if Michigan comes out and plays as well early as they did against UCONN they'll win. No TO's either.

That said I'm giving the nod to ND at home, 35-31, though it might as well be a toss up
thedynasty1998's avatar
thedynasty1998
Posts: 6,844
Sep 5, 2010 11:35am
Really wish this game was at a different time than the OSU game. I'll be rooting for Notre Dame, but this is a really difficult game to predict. Both beat solid teams in the opener, and both will badly want this game. Should be a good one.
Tiger2003's avatar
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Sep 5, 2010 12:40pm
I really really hope Notre Dame kicks the shit out of Michigan. I have a cousin who is a Michigan fan, and he was sending me texts left in right "Uh Oh Michigan is back" and many more stupid texts. I kept trying to tell him wake the fuck up its UCONN.

Im taking Notre Dame by 10.
DeyDurkie5's avatar
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Sep 5, 2010 12:41pm
Notre Dame has definately improved, but for some reason I just don't think their team stacks up against Michigan. It will be somewhat close, but I think Michigan takes it
A
areyoukiddingme
Posts: 88
Sep 5, 2010 1:35pm
Tiger2003, so if you cousin upsets you you want his team to lose? I had many ND fans texting the same type of crap to me as a UM fan.

Honestly, turnovers will play a huge role Saturday. If Robinson can come in and not get caught up in all the hype of a big game, UM keeps it close and has a good chance to win. Otherwise, ND by 10.
Mulva's avatar
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Sep 5, 2010 1:45pm
Hamp89;472294 wrote:That's really funny..I was thinking the same thing. As much as I tried checking Michigan out, they were on commercial at the same time as ND throughout the whole game. Unless dwccrew is making his prediction based on ESPN highlights, I'm not sure how you could say that.

I can't speak for dwccrew, but I watched plenty of each game as well, and it's really pretty simple.

Not being a fan of either ND or Michigan, I didn't feel the need to wait until commercial breaks to change the channel. I flipped back and forth plenty during the action, and whichever game had more going on at the time is the one I would watch. It only takes about a half-second to hit the channel return button. I agree that Michigan definitely looked more impressive.

That said, I'm picking Notre Dame for the same reason I took Michigan this weekend. When two average teams play, it's usually smart to go with the home side.
sherm03's avatar
sherm03
Posts: 7,349
Sep 5, 2010 1:51pm
The Equalizer;472275 wrote:Not sure what happened to ND's offense in the 3rd. I'm sure Kelly will correct that. Defense looked not only solid, but energized. Jesus, Gary Gray had more tackles yesterday than I think in his entire career. Can't wait to see them against better competition. We finally have reason to hope.

In all honesty, I think the whole team went into cruise control after the TD pass to TJ Jones.

The Irish had just gone up 20-3. The defense never gave anyone a reason to worry and had Purdue pinned deep in their own territory. I think the young guys just took their foot off the gas. The safety didn't help either. That was just a bad play call IMO.

I think that is due to the fact that they are young, and it's a very fixable problem.
killer_ewok's avatar
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Sep 5, 2010 1:56pm
rock_knutne;472338 wrote:^^^^Te'o missed a couple tackles but Purdue was looking for him the entire game. What impressed me was the overall defensive effort. As stated above, they were in position and had plenty left in the tank late in the game. Te'o aside, because he's going to be harrased all year, how about Carlo Calabrese? Another big difference was the cornerback play.......last year, those outside running plays went for 10 plus yards it seemed almost every time, that definitely wasn't the case yesterday. Gray and Walls seeled the corner almost every time.


Te'o missed more than "a couple tackles" but that's just semantics I suppose. Bottom line....he needs to wrap guys up. But I agree about the overall defensive effort and Calabrese played good yesterday. I was impressed.
Non's avatar
Non
Posts: 9,517
Sep 5, 2010 2:11pm
I watched more of the Notre Dame game than the Michigan game.

I liked the play of Notre Dame's cornerbacks, particularly in run defense. Walls and Gray.

Although they did give up a lot of short passes in a soft cover 2 to Keith Smith.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Sep 5, 2010 4:26pm
Hey ND can you stop a QB Draw? If you can, you should annihilate the simplistic HS Offense scUM runs.
Hb31187's avatar
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Sep 5, 2010 8:14pm
Lol this Tiernan troll is in full force this football season
Trueblue23's avatar
Trueblue23
Posts: 7,463
Sep 5, 2010 9:44pm
I admit that I didn't watch any of the Notre Dame game, simply because of the Michigan game being on at the same time. So I'm in no shape to make any kind of prediction.

GO BLUE!!!