Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems Wordio
Log In Create Account

Logan @ Pickerington North

Home ▸ Archive ▸ High School Football ▸ Logan @ Pickerington North
Tiger2003's avatar

Tiger2003

Kill or be Killed

15,421 posts
Sep 4, 2010 1:44 AM
WOW Logan 0-2....Not looking good.
Sep 3, 2010 9:44pm
L

LoganAlumni99

Devil's B@stard Son

116 posts
Sep 4, 2010 1:58 AM
Final

Logan 03
North 24
Sep 3, 2010 9:58pm
L

LoganAlumni99

Devil's B@stard Son

116 posts
Sep 4, 2010 2:00 AM
Tiger2003;471015 wrote:WOW Logan 0-2....Not looking good.

Lost too many starters. Defense is struggling to tackle. Trying to arm tackle doesn't cut it againt quality D1 opponents.
Sep 3, 2010 10:00pm
Tiger2003's avatar

Tiger2003

Kill or be Killed

15,421 posts
Sep 4, 2010 2:00 AM
LoganAlumni99;471028 wrote:Final

Logan 03
North 24

Wow....

North bounced back in a big way....Is Logan offense just not that good or did North plays some great defense this week?
Sep 3, 2010 10:00pm
L

LoganAlumni99

Devil's B@stard Son

116 posts
Sep 4, 2010 2:05 AM
Tiger2003;471031 wrote:Wow....

North bounced back in a big way....Is Logan offense just not that good or did North plays some great defense this week?

Logan's offense rates about a C- or D+ so far. They have some talent, but are REALLY green.
Sep 3, 2010 10:05pm
L

LoganAlumni99

Devil's B@stard Son

116 posts
Sep 4, 2010 2:32 AM
Once again, Logan showed signs of good things to come. Lancaster and North are just too good to post W's against while you're still learning as you go. As long as the kids keep their heads up and work hard they can still turn this season around.
Sep 3, 2010 10:32pm
Walt's avatar

Walt

Senior Member

237 posts
Sep 4, 2010 4:16 AM
I am not saying this to diminish North's accomplishment, but Logan is just not a very good football team right now. They're offense is not C- or D+.... right now they are struggling to get to D.
Sep 4, 2010 12:16am
L

LoganAlumni99

Devil's B@stard Son

116 posts
Sep 4, 2010 7:45 PM
Walt;471192 wrote:I am not saying this to diminish North's accomplishment, but Logan is just not a very good football team right now. They're offense is not C- or D+.... right now they are struggling to get to D.

The reason I gave Logan's offense a C- or D+ is because of the signs of potential. They scored 24 against a good Lancaster team (had a touchdown called back for an illegal block) and had a 100 yard rusher, and were inside the Lancaster 10 on another occasion.

Of course it is not as good as what North will face in the OCC, but it is not an F.
Sep 4, 2010 3:45pm
Walt's avatar

Walt

Senior Member

237 posts
Sep 4, 2010 10:41 PM
In your opinion, after seeing both North and Lancaster in back to back weeks.... which team is better?
Sep 4, 2010 6:41pm
L

LoganAlumni99

Devil's B@stard Son

116 posts
Sep 5, 2010 3:07 AM
Walt;471937 wrote:In your opinion, after seeing both North and Lancaster in back to back weeks.... which team is better?

Well, it depends. I would give Lancaster's offense a slight edge over North's offense, but North's defense did a lot better than Lancaster's against Logan's offense. If I had to take a guess, I would say Lancaster will beat North head-to-head. I guess only time will tell though.
Sep 4, 2010 11:07pm
L

LoganAlumni99

Devil's B@stard Son

116 posts
Sep 5, 2010 3:09 AM
LoganAlumni99;472142 wrote:Well, it depends. I would give Lancaster's offense a slight edge over North's offense, but North's defense did a lot better than Lancaster's against Logan's offense. If I had to take a guess, I would say Lancaster will beat North head-to-head. I guess only time will tell though.

With all that being said, Logan actually had a chance to beat Lancaster. Whereas, North pretty much dominated Logan from beginning to end.
Sep 4, 2010 11:09pm