Music?

Home Archive Serious Business Music?
~

~U~

Member

99 posts
Jul 10, 2010 9:56 PM
Will we ever get the kind of great music like we had from the 60s? It's amazing how most of the 60s music holds its own vs anything today.

Let's be honest most of today's music you could throw a pair of shoes in the dryer and get the same thing.
Jul 10, 2010 9:56pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Jul 10, 2010 10:00 PM
There is great music being made today.
Rockism is a primitivist ideology; a subtext of rockism is that, at one time in history, they "got music right", and that all subsequent innovations have compromised this purity. (This golden age is often placed in the 1960s or 1970s.) Critics of rockism assert that this vaunted "golden age" of pure, authentic music is a myth, and that popular music never was entirely free of the interference of commercialism, marketing and commodification.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockism
Jul 10, 2010 10:00pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Jul 10, 2010 10:01 PM
~U~;419867 wrote:Will we ever get the kind of great music like we had from the 60s? It's amazing how most of the 60s music holds its own vs anything today.

Let's be honest most of today's music you could throw a pair of shoes in the dryer and get the same thing.

what is good music to you? quit listening to the radio and you will find great music
Jul 10, 2010 10:01pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Jul 10, 2010 10:09 PM
There's tons of music with talent behind it today and also a message and strong undertones of politics.
Jul 10, 2010 10:09pm
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Jul 10, 2010 10:12 PM
DeyDurkie5;419880 wrote:what is good music to you? quit listening to the radio and you will find great music

Agreed. The best modern day music doesn't often make it to the radio.
Jul 10, 2010 10:12pm
GOONx19's avatar

GOONx19

An exceptional poster.

7,147 posts
Jul 10, 2010 10:14 PM
I agree with these guys, your viewpoint is incredibly insular. There's plenty of good music in all genres these days.
Jul 10, 2010 10:14pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Jul 10, 2010 10:15 PM
And it's not because it isn't popular enough to make it on the radio. But that radio isn't as transcendent of a music force anymore. Artists/labels can promote things on Facebook, Myspace, Twitter, and various music forums and websites (Spin, Spinner, AP.Net, etc). As well as the ability to distribute without a retailer makes it much easier for bands to ignore radio entirely. Hell, how often do you hear Radiohead on the radio?
Jul 10, 2010 10:15pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Jul 10, 2010 10:16 PM
ccrunner609;419903 wrote:Because music excecs put out bullshit stuff like Lady gaga and Soulja boy playing on the dumbness of people to gobble it up just because they hear it on the radio.
People did the same thing in the past. Ever hear of KISS?
Jul 10, 2010 10:16pm
~

~U~

Member

99 posts
Jul 10, 2010 10:19 PM
One thing I notice is most musicians on the radio or popular today don't even write there own music. Amazing what McCartney and Lennon did.
Jul 10, 2010 10:19pm
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Jul 10, 2010 10:40 PM
~U~;419915 wrote:One thing I notice is most musicians on the radio or popular today don't even write there own music. Amazing what McCartney and Lennon did.

The Beatles started out almost exclusively as a cover band though, not writing their own songs. And McCartney wrote plenty of awful songs from a strictly lyrical perspective.
Jul 10, 2010 10:40pm
darbypitcher22's avatar

darbypitcher22

Senior Member

8,000 posts
Jul 10, 2010 11:16 PM
60's?

everyone knows some of the best music came out in the 80s
Jul 10, 2010 11:16pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Jul 11, 2010 12:06 AM
darbypitcher22;419979 wrote:60's?

everyone knows some of the best music came out in the 80s

80s? Everyone knows some of the best music came out in the 90s.

It doesn't stop. There is awesome music coming out all the damned time.
Jul 11, 2010 12:06am
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Jul 11, 2010 12:07 AM
Mulva;419945 wrote:The Beatles started out almost exclusively as a cover band though, not writing their own songs. And McCartney wrote plenty of awful songs from a strictly lyrical perspective.
Anyone with a library as large as The Beatles will have some less than stellar songs. But overall most of The Beatles work is pretty damned good.
Jul 11, 2010 12:07am
majorspark's avatar

majorspark

Senior Member

5,122 posts
Jul 11, 2010 12:50 AM
A lot of one's affinity to a certain time frame of music has to do with pleasant memories the music brings of their youth. Because of this I am biased to the late 70's and all the 80's.

I listen to a lot of music from all time periods and genres. If I had to make a choice I would say the 60's and 80's produced the best IMO.
Jul 11, 2010 12:50am
S

Sonofanump

Jul 11, 2010 12:56 AM
I'd say '66 to '75 would be the best ten years of music.
Jul 11, 2010 12:56am
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Jul 11, 2010 1:12 AM
I Wear Pants;420027 wrote:Anyone with a library as large as The Beatles will have some less than stellar songs. But overall most of The Beatles work is pretty damned good.

They're the greatest band of all-time. But there was a lot of truth to the "moon, June, spoon" comment regarding Paul's writing. His lyrics were as lame/poppy as anything you'll hear on the radio today a lot of the time (especially obvious once he was solo).
Sonofanump;420073 wrote:I'd say '66 to '75 would be the best ten years of music.
I don't think there's any doubt about that.
Jul 11, 2010 1:12am
S

sjmvsfscs08

Senior Member

2,963 posts
Jul 11, 2010 1:50 AM
There's great stuff today you just have to listen to Indie stuff to get it. Basically those bands give the finger to the corporate producers and do their own thing. Since technically any band that isn't big is "indie," there is a great deal of bad shit out there. But, what is good, is 1000000x better than stuff on the radio.

Radio jumped the shark a long time ago, but for me it was mid-2008 when I just couldn't take it anymore. By late 2009 I was completely into the Indie scene.
Jul 11, 2010 1:50am
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Jul 11, 2010 1:51 AM
I doubt that.

There is no best ten years of music. And if there was it was when Ludwig van was still around.
Jul 11, 2010 1:51am
S

Swamp Fox

Senior Member

2,218 posts
Jul 11, 2010 2:56 AM
I Think that basically, music is good if you like it. We like the days of our youth. My musical era would be from the late 50's to the early-mid 70's with a smattering of later stuff thrown in. I was in our local bookstore, coffee shop today and I noticed that they were selling phonograph records for a dollar each or 10 for seven dollars. As I glanced through the various selections, I realized that there was another advantage to being old. No one likes my music and not many people have actual record players in their homes anymore. I bought a reproduction of an old radio at Krogers a few years ago and I go to antique shops and peruse old records. I have quite a collection .itI is an fm-am radio with no remote that also has a built-in phonograph. To me music sounds somehow better with a few scratches etc.
Jul 11, 2010 2:56am
Glory Days's avatar

Glory Days

Senior Member

7,809 posts
Jul 11, 2010 3:08 AM
where is sleeper at? we all know by now the only good music is the music that came out this year.
Jul 11, 2010 3:08am
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Jul 11, 2010 12:40 PM
Swamp Fox;420125 wrote:I Think that basically, music is good if you like it. We like the days of our youth. My musical era would be from the late 50's to the early-mid 70's with a smattering of later stuff thrown in. I was in our local bookstore, coffee shop today and I noticed that they were selling phonograph records for a dollar each or 10 for seven dollars. As I glanced through the various selections, I realized that there was another advantage to being old. No one likes my music and not many people have actual record players in their homes anymore. I bought a reproduction of an old radio at Krogers a few years ago and I go to antique shops and peruse old records. I have quite a collection .itI is an fm-am radio with no remote that also has a built-in phonograph. To me music sounds somehow better with a few scratches etc.
Actually if you have a decent record player they will sound better. The sound "depth" is better on records as they just etch the wave pattern into the vinyl whereas a CD/mp3 uses a less exact form.

I have some of my favorite old and new albums on vinyl because they're fun to collect and sound awesome.
Jul 11, 2010 12:40pm
~

~U~

Member

99 posts
Jul 11, 2010 12:57 PM
Even Lennon took shots at McCartney saying all he writes is silly love songs. McCartney then came out with the song, Silly Love Songs as a shot at Lennon. I think (maybe wrong) Lennon then came out with How Do You Sleep.

ccrunner609..After mentioning JB you need to a time out from this forum. :)
Jul 11, 2010 12:57pm
darbypitcher22's avatar

darbypitcher22

Senior Member

8,000 posts
Jul 11, 2010 2:34 PM
I love listening on vinyl more than I like listening on CD. and it helps that a lot of the bands I listen to have produced stuff on vinyl
Jul 11, 2010 2:34pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Jul 11, 2010 3:42 PM
If you have a decent system a good quality vinyl will sound better than a CD.
Jul 11, 2010 3:42pm
D

DESCENTdmc

Senior Member

372 posts
Jul 11, 2010 4:20 PM
Looooooove vinyl, still buy it on the regular, just got a sweet Ramallah 7" in the mail 2 weeks ago. Most bands/record labels I listen to still put out vinyl and now slot of bands are gettin back to cassettes as well, don't think I'll jump on collecting that
Jul 11, 2010 4:20pm