jordo212000;380250 wrote:He was the best candidate available. It's funny that now "defensive-minded" has become a bad thing, in Ohio anyways. The thing is, if he was like Mike D'antoni, that wouldn't cut it either because: A) it doesn't win championships and B) Lebron would never play for him because of the lack of defensive emphasis (<-- actual quote from a Cavs fan a while back).
So which is it? What makes the ideal coaching candidate? Should he be one of Lebron's boys live in Lebron's basement right now? Or should he have jumped around the Eastern conference and failed to win in any of his previous stops?
Are you serious? You're basically just saying what you want to say, because NOBODY on this thread said it wasn't good enough. It was a very good hire, all anybody is saying (for the 100th time) is that it's not the BIG NAME guy that would make players say "Wow, we gotta go play for that guy"..
HOWEVER, It's a little telling to me that Boston wasn't even looking at Tom as the next head coach. They didn't even consider him as head coach material. THAT in itself just raised some questions to me.
Word around the league, and according to Yahoo! is that Dan Gilberts #1 target may be Tom Izzo.
Also, you're quote about LeBron not playing for D'Antoni came from a huddler, but the original quote came from LeBron after the Cavs smoked the Knicks this season at the Q. He said, and I'm obviously paraphrasing "I could never see myself playing in a system that didn't focus on defense, I never have before"