Did you actually read the article? By your comments you OBVIOUSLY have not.
They created synthetic DNA and implanted it into an already existing "host cell". While obviously very novel, very useful, very "ground breaking", it has nothing to do with evolution and abiogenesis.
They weren't even attempting at discovering anything about proteins to single cell idea of abiogenesis. They weren't even doing anything with regards to evolution. They didn't start at "amino acids" and "by chance" create a single cell which is what your view of the first life obviously is. They synthetically created DNA, just like one could with any long string polymer or protein, and implanted it into an already existing cell. I'm fully aware that DNA is much harder to synthesize than any other compound, that's the novel part of this. But for you to come on here saying this proves proteins to life abiogenesis is true is ignorant at best.
Good Lord BCS, sometimes you amaze me at how retarded your posts actually can be.