LTrain23 wrote:
Non wrote:
LTrain23 wrote:
Non wrote:
it shouldn't be irrelevant
two totally different teams, last year without Garnett and this year with him
No, because the Cavs have beaten the Celtics with Garnett, so it's irrelevant to me.
not in the playoffs
you keep looking at last year's Celtics as a frame of reference
you said before the series the Celtics wouldn't be tougher than the Bulls because the Bulls and Celtics went seven games LAST YEAR...when Garnett didn't play
What?
I never said the Celtics wouldn't be tougher than the Bulls, and if I did, I was drunk.
I knew this series would be a fight. I thought the Cavs would win in 6, but I'm wrong.. Obviously.
You must've been drunk.
I'm not going to look back but I said at the end of the Chicago series that the Cavs were showing holes in the defense and that the Celtics would definitely be a better test defensively with their playoff experience.
Most of the Cavs fans didn't seem to think this would be a tough series.
Not that it matters, just saying. The Celtics with Garnett have a significant toughness in the playoffs that clearly was missing last year.
Orlando might not have been able to come back from 3-2 down if he was in there so that basis for comparison is significantly flawed.
