I believe chances are that if he didn't act illegally, he acted inappropriately. It's becoming more obvious by the day that this guy is a piece of human fecal material. While he may not be a criminal, he is almost certainly not some innocent victim of his celebrity.se-alum wrote: Let's be honest, chances are everything that happened that night was consentual
I agree with this. How can you suspend a guy on accusations that weren't even strong enough to be charged for?se-alum wrote: As much as I despise the Steelers, and want them to lose every single game, I think suspensions like this are ridiculous. He wasn't charged with any crime.
First off, the Rooneys said they will accept what ever Goodell hands down. Secondly, people will wear their #7 jersey's again as soon as he steps on the field and starts winning football games again. And finally, he countered sued that gold digger out in Nevada.Footwedge wrote: Plenty of people in Pittsbugh that will no longer wear a black and gold #7 jersey anymore. My thinking is that Art II will add onto the punishment dished out by the league.
The fact is...he is still fighting litigation on a civil suit out west for basically the same thing. How in the fuck can he put himself into another he-said she-said situation?
The guy is a fuggin idiot.
the fuck why aren't you complaining there is another big ben thread?rock_knutne wrote: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=5121614
4 to 6 games is a little harsh IMO. Vick, who was convicted and did time, got 6 games and it was reduced to 2 with good behavior and following through with any stipulations the league mandated. I thinking the same happens to Ben, he follows through with what ever counciling he has to do and it will be reduced to 2 games.
I don't think they ARE "actively shopping" him but I'm sure they are listening to offers.LJ wrote: Where are you guys hearing that they are actively shopping Ben?
just broke on ESPNLJ wrote: Where are you guys hearing that they are actively shopping Ben?
+1112quik4u wrote:the fuck why aren't you complaining there is another big ben thread?rock_knutne wrote: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=5121614
4 to 6 games is a little harsh IMO. Vick, who was convicted and did time, got 6 games and it was reduced to 2 with good behavior and following through with any stipulations the league mandated. I thinking the same happens to Ben, he follows through with what ever counciling he has to do and it will be reduced to 2 games.
Yeah, I thought that report broke last week that they would listen. I can't find ANYTHING online that says that they are actively shopping him.BR1986FB wrote:I don't think they ARE "actively shopping" him but I'm sure they are listening to offers.LJ wrote: Where are you guys hearing that they are actively shopping Ben?
Good question. All I've been hearing on the radio and TV is that not a lot of teams want to touch him with it being a 4-6 game suspension. I did hear they were hoping to make a move before the news of the length of suspension...but maybe I'm just not listening to the right people.LJ wrote: Where are you guys hearing that they are actively shopping Ben?
schefter was just on sportscenter talking about itLJ wrote: Where are you guys hearing that they are actively shopping Ben?
