Manhattan Buckeye wrote:
Barf, great basketball program, another NE team (awful recruiting area) with a disinterested tv base. UConn's football program has done ok given its recruiting area and location (has anyone here besides me been to Snores, I mean Storrs), but it has probably peaked. The NYC/Boston markets simply do not care about college football.
There have actually been a few big D-1 recruits to come out of Connecticut in football in recent years. Let's not forget that a lot of former college and NFL greats now live in Bristol and surrounding areas because of their work at ESPN. And there's some good football in New Jersey too. Remember Malcolm Jenkins? He was a product of Piscataway, NJ, home of Rutgers.
Yes, adding these teams would be more of a boost for basketball than for football but let's be honest, there aren't nearly as many big time college football programs (BCS bowl teams) that are going to be willing to move to the Big Ten. If you add say Texas and Notre Dame you now have five teams most years (Texas, ND, OSU, Michigan, PSU) fighting for two BCS bowl slots. It will be easier to add schools that bring a lot in basketball than in football.
I honestly think that adding Notre Dame will do more for the Big Ten in the NY media market than adding Rutgers and UConn will do. There is a very large Catholic population in NY and the northeast and Notre Dame has a history of playing some games in Yankee Stadium and they are picking that history back up again soon. I think that adding three Big East schools will make it even more likely that Notre Dame (who plays in the Big East in everything but football) will finally join the Big Ten.