SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
May 6, 2010 1:17pm
Um, did I say that anywhere in the thread?
2quik4u
Posts: 4,388
May 6, 2010 1:18pm
SQ_Crazies wrote: How bad?
I think it's going to be ugly. I'm praying that the Cavs don't play them because I think it will be epic in that case. Don't want to see anyone get hurt--and yes I think they may really get that bad.
I can't lie, I'm all excited to see it happen.
first post
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
May 6, 2010 1:19pm
The thread asks a simple fucking question and I gave my answer starting with the words "I think". Just answer the question, no one said you had to agree.
As far as my prediction, it could still happen--so I'm not sure why you're bothering to poke fun at me.
As far as my prediction, it could still happen--so I'm not sure why you're bothering to poke fun at me.
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
May 6, 2010 1:20pm
Yeah...what about it? The part that says I'm praying the Cavs don't play them? Do you pray for things that you know are going to happen?
I didn't want the drama that all those punk ass C's players bring to the floor, that's all. People get hurt when dirty players get frustrated and start acting stupid.
I didn't want the drama that all those punk ass C's players bring to the floor, that's all. People get hurt when dirty players get frustrated and start acting stupid.
2quik4u
Posts: 4,388
May 6, 2010 1:24pm
for someone who acts like he knows the most on the site, i thought it was a pretty stupid thread for u to make
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
May 6, 2010 1:28pm
Well, I hardly act like that. I only respond to things that I have an opinion on--usually only when it differs from someone else's. So, I can see why it would seem like that.
But, why is it a stupid thread to make? It asks a question, you can answer it however you'd like.
I mean, if you can't see the C's losing control when the lights are about to go out on them sometime during this postseason, then you don't pay as much attention to the NBA as I thought.
But, why is it a stupid thread to make? It asks a question, you can answer it however you'd like.
I mean, if you can't see the C's losing control when the lights are about to go out on them sometime during this postseason, then you don't pay as much attention to the NBA as I thought.
2quik4u
Posts: 4,388
May 6, 2010 1:34pm
Injuries hurt them last year and if they stay healthy i dont really see a collapse. The only thing that is really going to hurt them is being tired. This is also a team who has won the nba title with the same starting five they know how to win it.
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
May 6, 2010 1:35pm
You really have no idea what I'm talking about in saying "collapse" do you?
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
May 6, 2010 1:36pm
LOL, read the whole first page...it's a joke that I'm even on here defending myself right now.
Yet another example of how no one can take things at face value around here and ALWAYS take things out of context due to their own stupidity.
Yet another example of how no one can take things at face value around here and ALWAYS take things out of context due to their own stupidity.
M
mallymal614
Posts: 3,746
May 6, 2010 1:38pm
I agree if. If they had Garnett, they would have likely been back in the finals. Remember, they took Orlando to 7 games without KG, which is better than the Cavs did losing to the Magics in 6 with a healthy roster.2quik4u wrote: Injuries hurt them last year
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
May 6, 2010 1:39pm
Cavs/Magic and Celtics/Magic don't relate at all though--it doesn't say anything about a potential matchup of the two teams that didn't play each other. Different matchups, different locations, different officials. You can't base anything on that.
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
May 6, 2010 1:39pm
M
mallymal614
Posts: 3,746
May 6, 2010 2:06pm
My Brother had the optimus prime vs megatron oneHeretic wrote:
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
May 6, 2010 2:08pm
^^^spoiled bastard!!!
I had one that was missing an arm
I had one that was missing an arm
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
May 6, 2010 2:08pm
This thread still makes me laugh.
It was a completely stupid thread to start to begin with. The Celtics are an old team. In the regular season that actually figures into the occasion, but in the playoffs David Stern gives so many days in between games that their age doesn't matter.
Anybody with half a brain knew that the Celtics weren't finished.
It was a completely stupid thread to start to begin with. The Celtics are an old team. In the regular season that actually figures into the occasion, but in the playoffs David Stern gives so many days in between games that their age doesn't matter.
Anybody with half a brain knew that the Celtics weren't finished.
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
May 6, 2010 2:10pm
LOL...still don't get the point.
M
mallymal614
Posts: 3,746
May 6, 2010 2:11pm
lolwes_mantooth wrote: ^^^spoiled bastard!!!
I had one that was missing an arm
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
May 6, 2010 2:19pm
Of course you don'tSQ_Crazies wrote: LOL...still don't get the point.
N
Nate
Posts: 3,949
May 6, 2010 2:19pm
Thaddeus Gibson!!! You have no right to call someone out on something like this.lhslep134 wrote: Remember that time that the Celtics have a TON more talent than the Bulls?
Remember that time SQ was wrong? I can't personally remember because it happens at least twice a day. I now understand why people HATE Cleveland fans, it's because of arrogant deuches like SQ, just LOOK at this thread. Even if I believed what you said was true, which I don't at all, I still wouldn't say it. The Celtics are finally showing the team they're capable of being, the fact they barely showed it during the regular season is now meaningless, and I can easily see the Cavs losing this series if Lebron's elbow continues to affect his game like it did last night.
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
May 6, 2010 2:22pm
Read the thread dumbass, all I did was ask a question. Had nothing to do with the Cavs, the only mention of them was I was hoping Miami knocked them out so we didn't have to put up with their drama.jordo212000 wrote:Of course you don'tSQ_Crazies wrote: LOL...still don't get the point.
The collapse I was referring to is them turning into their dirty, cheap selves when the lights are about to go out on them and watching them fall apart out of frustration. Had nothing to do with them losing a series in 4 games or whatever. That was a separate prediction in itself.
Sorry that you're a dumbass and take things out of context.
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
May 6, 2010 2:29pm
Looking at the thread, it is pretty obvious that everybody else interpreted your post the same way that I did. And you saying that the thread was referring to their dirty play is just completely laughable and is an attempt to save face.SQ_Crazies wrote: Read the thread dumbass, all I did was ask a question. Had nothing to do with the Cavs, the only mention of them was I was hoping Miami knocked them out so we didn't have to put up with their drama.
The collapse I was referring to is them turning into their dirty, cheap selves when the lights are about to go out on them and watching them fall apart out of frustration. Had nothing to do with them losing a series in 4 games or whatever. That was a separate prediction in itself.
Sorry that you're a dumbass and take things out of context.
N
Nate
Posts: 3,949
May 6, 2010 2:30pm
Sorry SQ, I gotta agree. I did think the Cavs would smash the C's in 4 also though.jordo212000 wrote:Looking at the thread, it is pretty obvious that everybody else interpreted your post the same way that I did. And you saying that the thread was referring to their dirty play is just completely laughable and is an attempt to save face.SQ_Crazies wrote: Read the thread dumbass, all I did was ask a question. Had nothing to do with the Cavs, the only mention of them was I was hoping Miami knocked them out so we didn't have to put up with their drama.
The collapse I was referring to is them turning into their dirty, cheap selves when the lights are about to go out on them and watching them fall apart out of frustration. Had nothing to do with them losing a series in 4 games or whatever. That was a separate prediction in itself.
Sorry that you're a dumbass and take things out of context.
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
May 6, 2010 2:33pm
Funny thing is all I ever said was I didn't think it would go past 5 games, not 4.
But the best part about your last post jordo, is that you said others "interpreted" the first post the same way you did. No shit, because like I said, it's a common occurrence for MANY people on this thread to take something out of context and not at face value.
But the best part about your last post jordo, is that you said others "interpreted" the first post the same way you did. No shit, because like I said, it's a common occurrence for MANY people on this thread to take something out of context and not at face value.
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
May 6, 2010 2:34pm
And what's funnier yet is that you were the first response to the thread--instantly being the one to assume this had anything to do with the Cavs and you got that ball rolling...
Fool.
Again, get the cock out of your mouth for a second and reread the first page...when did I say anything about anyone beating them in any number of games?
Was not at all what was meant by "collapse", or like I said in a later post, "going down in flames".
Fool.
Again, get the cock out of your mouth for a second and reread the first page...when did I say anything about anyone beating them in any number of games?
Was not at all what was meant by "collapse", or like I said in a later post, "going down in flames".
M
mallymal614
Posts: 3,746
May 6, 2010 2:39pm
