I'd say he's quite a bit better than decent. But you've made your opinion of him very clear.skank wrote: Honestly, What....in the hell....is the facination with Chad Johnson? I mean, yeah....he's a....decent reciever, DECENT. That's about it.
How has his career been a disappointment?Al Capone wrote: HighRoller74, I may pull you chain every now and then but if you think Stinko and Ward are equal when it comes to the HOF, you dont know nothing about football. I mean you can honestly say that his career has been a disappointment along with Carson(another usc bust) Palmer.
BOOOOOM, cya capone...now come back with your Ward 2 rings, ocho none comment!HighRoller74 wrote:How has his career been a disappointment?Al Capone wrote: HighRoller74, I may pull you chain every now and then but if you think Stinko and Ward are equal when it comes to the HOF, you dont know nothing about football. I mean you can honestly say that his career has been a disappointment along with Carson(another usc bust) Palmer.
Carson I can somewhat agree with, but Ochocinco has performed pretty well, his stats are pretty damn close to Wards, in 3 less years, so if he's been a disappointment, whats that say about Ward?
He's 200 Catches away from Ward, 1000 yards, and 16 TD's. All of which can be attained if he plays 3 years longer than Ward.
He also currently has more Pro Bowls, and AP All-Pro 1st Team awards than Ward does.
The only thing alluding him is the Playoff Accolades, which really cannot be blamed on a WR. A half-dozen things have to go right, for a WR to even catch the ball, where as it doesn't take much for a QB, or HB to be successful, or take over a game. However it's much more difficult for a WR to do so.
If Chad Ochocinco continues to produce as he has so far in his career, he'll be in the HOF, same for Hines Ward, but for you to say that Ward is a surefire HOF, and Ochocinco has no shot, is just naive or just plain ignorant on your part.
Personally, I think he has a long way to go but I'll take a "wait and see" approach when it comes to Ocho Stinko and the HOF. Ward is one tough SOB and has shown his longevity, I'm not sure Ocho Stinko can play as long as Ward has.HighRoller74 wrote:Ochocinco's HOF chances are every bit as good as Hines Ward. The HOF isn't fascinated by team awards like you seem to think it is, they base their membership off of individual accomplishments, for the most part.
900 receptions
11000 yards
78 TD's
4 Pro Bowls
3 AP All-Pro 2nd team
2 Super Bowls
1 SB MVP
700 Receptions
10000 Yards
62 TD's
6 Pro Bowls
2 AP All Pro 1st teams
1 AP All Pro 2nd Team
All in 3 less seasons.
If Ochocinco continues this productions he'll eclipse the stats of Hines Ward, and really that's what matters when it comes to HOF voting. Which is why Dan Marino, and Jim Kelly are in the HOF, without winning a SB.
But Phil Simms, Joe Theismann, And Kenny Stabler, all SB winners are not in the HOF.
Ok, maybe better than decent, but 10 pages on this guy? 10 pages? On Chad Johnson? His relatives probably couldn't fill 10 pages on him.HighRoller74 wrote:I'd say he's quite a bit better than decent. But you've made your opinion of him very clear.skank wrote: Honestly, What....in the hell....is the facination with Chad Johnson? I mean, yeah....he's a....decent reciever, DECENT. That's about it.
Fact remains, he doesn't put up the stats he has, and been named to the All-Pro teams that he's been named too, if he was just decent. You may not like the antics, but you cannot deny his talent, and his production. Unless you're simply a hater.
What's yours? LMAO...........you have over 30 posts on this thread and your calling someone else out?Strapping Young Lad wrote: Yet here you are....
So, fill us in. What's your fascination with 85 that keeps you returning to this thread???
He's calling someone else out for complaining about the number of posts on this thread, while posting on this thread.rock_knutne wrote:What's yours? LMAO...........you have over 30 posts on this thread and your calling someone else out?Strapping Young Lad wrote: Yet here you are....
So, fill us in. What's your fascination with 85 that keeps you returning to this thread???
Wrong....I made no mention of the post count on this thread, ONLY the number of pages. I'm just returning every now and then to witness the lunacy, some of you have set up camp on this thread....Hence the question, is THIS guy worthy of 10 page.HighRoller74 wrote:He's calling someone else out for complaining about the number of posts on this thread, while posting on this thread.rock_knutne wrote:What's yours? LMAO...........you have over 30 posts on this thread and your calling someone else out?Strapping Young Lad wrote: Yet here you are....
So, fill us in. What's your fascination with 85 that keeps you returning to this thread???
That'd be like me complaining about all the Dems in office, and then casting a ballot for the Dems. It just doesn't make sense.
