Mike Clark wrote:

believer wrote:

Mike Clark wrote: I have a question for all of you pro-lifers.


What if the girl is a victim of rape or incest??

So killing the INNOCENT and DEFENSELESS baby rights the wrong?

You really would want the mother to have to carry a child she never planned on having??

How about the kid? What happens when she/he is a teenager and finds out that they were the product of a rape or that their grandfather is also their father?? Would you want to put a child through that? I sure wouldn't

Mike Clark wrote:You really would want the mother to have to carry a child she never planned on having??

How about the kid? What happens when she/he is a teenager and finds out that they were the product of a rape or that their grandfather is also their father?? Would you want to put a child through that? I sure wouldn't

Cleveland Buck wrote: I am for the federal government performing only their role as defined in the Constitution.

I am for free market capitalism with the federal government's only place in the economy to ensure that companies don't become so large that they distort the market.

I don't think the federal government needs any say in social issues.

I am for replacing our current tax system with a consumption tax. I am for lower tax rates and much lower government spending. I am for progressive tax rates that are not excessively progressive.

I am for a strong military, and I do feel it is good to have some bases strategically located around the world, but what we have now is just too much. We could cut our defense spending in half and still maintain the strongest, best equipped military in the world.

I feel that safety net programs like unemployment insurance are necessary to our society, but should come from the states, not the federal government. If the federal government wants to provide money to each state to help pay for programs like these in general (with no strings attached), that is fine as long as we aren't running a deficit to do it. Any money from the federal government that is directed or attached to any specific industry only serves to distort the free market in that industry and does far more harm than good.

Belly35 wrote: Capitalism
Strong Military ( bring back the draft)
Small Government
Private Sector (Government stays out of the private sector business)
Tort Reform for Medical Profession
Political Term Limits
United States Constitution (do not change or alter)
CCW
Drill for Oil
Death Penalty
Send Illegal Back
Shot first at the US Borders ask Question Later
Political Correctness My Ass
Entitlement Go Piss Up a Rope

bman618 wrote: Libertarian/Constitutionalist

And abortion is murder. There is only a couple of instances that it is acceptable, such as when the mother's life is in danger. I like the pro-abortion women argument about having control over their body. They do and they have to pay the consequences and not kill a child because of them wanting to have a fling. It's like me saying I want to eat a Big Mac and not gain any weight.

I Wear Pants wrote: I'm not a woman nor have I ever been raped so I don't think I have the perspective to make a choice like that. In scenarios like rape, I think the woman should be the one choosing.

Writerbuckeye wrote: Glad I was able to find all you folks (thanks Clevelandbuck).

Definitely a fiscal conservative and a social libertarian. Don't really want the government involved in most of the social issues, except I have no problem with allowing most drug use, prostitution and gambling and simply using the taxes/fees on it to pay for its regulation/policing.

Oh and in favor of the death penalty and strengthening our borders; that and energy independence (drill here, drill now) are national security issues, in my opinion.

isadore wrote: you are a fiscal conservative and more or less a social conservative. That is not a mix, that's pat robertson or sarah palin, if she knew what the word fiscal meant. when palin hears the word fiscal, she start do leg lifts and arm curls.