QuakerOats;1779937 wrote:Progressive --- code word for Marxist

QuakerOats;1779937 wrote:Progressive --- code word for Marxist

like_that;1780071 wrote:Didn't watch the debate last night, but I heard Hillary was flustered.

Also, I gave the DNC a lot of shit, but it is only fair I give the GOP shit for the same thing. A fucking debate on Saturday? Why even bother having a debate? Fucking pathetic.

Dr Winston O'Boogie;1779940 wrote:I notice that virtually all of your posts involve pointing out what you hate and name calling but little constructive. You've been taught well by the conservative talking heads. You decry people calling others names, but you do it every time. If I ended my posts with "conservative -- code word for fascist", you'd be pissy over that.

like_that;1780071 wrote:Didn't watch the debate last night, but I heard Hillary was flustered.

Also, I gave the DNC a lot of shit, but it is only fair I give the GOP shit for the same thing. A fucking debate on Saturday? Why even bother having a debate? Fucking pathetic.

sleeper;1780091 wrote:Hillary is terrible on stage. She relies a lot on cliche stuff about "I'm a woman, women like me!" to get rid any difficult questions.

sleeper;1780091 wrote:Hillary is terrible on stage. She relies a lot on cliche stuff about "I'm a woman, women like me!" to get rid any difficult questions.

It's too bad the Republican front runners are absolute clowns. This should be an easy zombie victory for the GOP but we have Trump and Cruz leading the pack.

sleeper;1780091 wrote:Hillary is terrible on stage. She relies a lot on cliche stuff about "I'm a woman, women like me!" to get rid any difficult questions.

It's too bad the Republican front runners are absolute clowns. This should be an easy zombie victory for the GOP but we have Trump and Cruz leading the pack.

SportsAndLady;1780106 wrote:Difficult question, she just laughs.

https://m.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/42egnx/hillary_laughs_off_everything_she_doesnt_want_to/

like_that;1780096 wrote: Even though trump is a clown I also think he would destroy Hillary in a debate.

HitsRus;1779989 wrote:What exactly are "progressives" progressing to? The word is a euphemism because you want people to think your different from other socialists. In truth you are, because regular socialists aren't necessarily elitists who use political correctness to destroy and denigrate independent thought....it's just not good for the collective.

Oh wait, that's starting to sound like communism.

HitsRus;1780237 wrote:Just sitting here this AM reading stuff and watching TV....and I can't help but wonder what planet some of these guys running for president are on. This week, Rick Santorum, Rand Paul, Mike Huckabee, and Martin O'Malley dropped out of the race, which, in my opinion, probably makes them more qualified to be president than some of the guys still in the race in that at least these guys have a grip on reality. After months of campaigning, getting blown out in Iowa, and still polling in the very low single digits, what makes these guys think they have a chance? What are they adding to presidential campaign? What on earth do they think is going to happen, what on earth do they think they can say, that will propel them to even approximate the support of the candidate on the edge of contention, Ben Carson? They've had months to get their message out, and they have no traction.

While I don't particularly have anything against Jeb and Christie, these guys in particular are annoying. They are not even in first among the governors...not close to Kasich in New Hampshire, who in turn is barely in double digits(maybe). Yet they run attack ads without really gaining any support for themselves...... At what point does it become counter-productive for the party, and their own political future to continue on?
C'mon Jeb...give your donors their money back so they can spend it on defeating the real enemy. The people have spoken already...they don't want another Bush in the White House....and they don't want you.

Spock;1780183 wrote:HC is getting destroyed by Cruz or Rubio in a debate. Hell Chris CHristie would run her off the stage

like_that;1780118 wrote:I think I posted in the Hillary thread, but if not there is a video compilation of her laughing off questions since 2007.

HitsRus;1780139 wrote:^^^LOL... I think she learned that from Joe Biden!

gut;1780094 wrote:I think, in the wake of all her scandals and lying and general dishonesty/untrustworthiness....the feigned indignation she uses to dodge tough questions aren't going to work. Obama did same thing in a few debates with Romney. The moderators really have to be in the bag to allow such a horrible duck-and-dodge.

"How dare you ask me that"....well, how dare you for doing it, and "how dare you" is not a response.

like_that;1780096 wrote:I think Rubio is going to take it, and I think he will destroy her in a debate.

Even though trump is a clown I also think he would destroy Hillary in a debate. The dude is like Charles Barkley, he can say whatever and not pay for it.

BoatShoes;1780245 wrote:Ole Biden's "scoff" is way better than Hillary's though haha.

BoatShoes;1780242 wrote:They are trying to take out your boy Rubio because he is inexperienced like Obama. If he can't handle it how is he going to beat Hillary and the liberal media? Not enough adderall, beta blockers and canned stump speeches in Rubio's man purse to beat that if he doesn't step his game up. Gonna have to earn it.

BoatShoes;1780240 wrote:Going full Quaker lately. Canada is not a communist country. Hong Kong is not a communist country. These countries have guaranteed paid leave and universal healthcare, etc. If you disagree with these things that's fine but you're not going to win hearts and minds by going "Communist!!"