BoatShoes;1778953 wrote:The St Louis Fed is not a liberal website. This was a fail and I acknowledge my fails unlike you for example who could not admit that you fell for that fake Obama story that you posted a thread about and had to revert to the very unchristian sin of lying about it.

I failed and posted a meme based on lies. Nobody's perfect. Carry on with believing that you are choosing the more conservative option when you support Trump over Hillary come November.

BoatShoes;1778953 wrote:The St Louis Fed is not a liberal website. This was a fail and I acknowledge my fails unlike you for example who could not admit that you fell for that fake Obama story that you posted a thread about and had to revert to the very unchristian sin of lying about it.

I failed and posted a meme based on lies. Nobody's perfect. Carry on with believing that you are choosing the more conservative option when you support Trump over Hillary come November.

HitsRus;1779005 wrote:Rubio Rising....
Polls show Rubio gaining major traction in Iowa. They are hoping for a solid 3rd place finish, but don't expect to finish 1 or 2.
http://time.com/4200555/marco-rubio-ted-cruz-iowa/

BoatShoes;1778934 wrote:

His professed positions in any case save his budget exploding tax cuts and his immigration stance are more liberal than Hillary's in a number of areas.

Namely, he agrees with Bernie on Single payer and said as much during the first debate.

He opposes foreign intervention in almost all cases where Hillary supports foreign intervention e.g. libya, syria, Iraq.

He is a trade protectionist opposing the TPP and NAFTA like Bernie whereas Hillary supports the TPP and NAFTA and is generally supportive of free trade.

He is not agaonst gay marriage nor is her seriously against abortion...he has previously supported Partial Birth Abortion openly.

He has supported the elimination of income tax on individuals earning below 50k but increasing it on the very wealthy...not exactly standard liberal methodology but supportive of more wealth redistribution nevertheless.

Why do you think Romney style establishment Republicans are warming to Clinton??? Because she is more in favor of the establishment conservative worldview than Trump.

Sorry to burst your bubble but a vote for Trump is a vote for old school union protectionist economic liberalism and social New York Values liberalism. Please proceed.

jmog;1779040 wrote:1. WTF are you talking about wrt Obama thread? And lying? Come on BS, I know you like to attack the person rather than the argument but you are really digging deep here.

2. I am not a Trump supporter. I think he is right behind Hillary for the most disgusting person in the whole race. He is the last R I hope wins the nomination. Only way I ever vote for him is in the general over Hill or Sand.

dwccrew;1779143 wrote:Everyone has already blasted you and you have admitted your fail, so I'll just give you a hearty LOL.

Apple;1779617 wrote:Rand Paul just dropped out of the race.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/rand-paul-dropping-out-of-white-house-race-218675

BoatShoes;1779707 wrote:The libertarian got less than 5% in Iowa while a Republican who supports single-payer and trade protectionism and a self-proclaimed socialist democrat who supports single-payer healthcare together got 75% of the vote almost in their respective primaries.

BoatShoes;1779707 wrote:The libertarian got less than 5% in Iowa while a Republican who supports single-payer and trade protectionism and a self-proclaimed socialist democrat who supports single-payer healthcare together got 75% of the vote almost in their respective primaries.

BoatShoes;1779707 wrote:The libertarian got less than 5% in Iowa while a Republican who supports single-payer and trade protectionism and a self-proclaimed socialist democrat who supports single-payer healthcare together got 75% of the vote almost in their respective primaries.

QuakerOats;1779731 wrote: And, there is no such thing a socialist democrat, or a democratic socialist. He is a socialist.

gut;1779773 wrote:I figure if socialists call themselves liberals, then communists probably call themselves democratic socialists.

gut;1779773 wrote:I figure if socialists call themselves liberals, then communists probably call themselves democratic socialists.

And, there is no such thing a socialist democrat, or a democratic socialist. He is a socialist. Socialists are essentially an enemy of Americans.

HitsRus;1779793 wrote:oh yes there are "social democrats" ... Back in 1917 they were called Bolsheviks.

gut;1779773 wrote:I figure if socialists call themselves liberals, then communists probably call themselves democratic socialists.

HitsRus;1779813 wrote:Santorum drops out of the race and throws his support to Rubio.

HitsRus;1779813 wrote:Santorum drops out of the race and throws his support to Rubio.

BoatShoes;1779566 wrote:This thread where you believed Obama told people not to celebrate July 4th and then lied and said you were trolling.

http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?44826-Obama-told-American-Muslims-not-to-celebrate-July-4th

And in case you didn't notice everyone has ignored my argument that Trump's policies are liberal and attacked me personally (including you) because I fell for the stupid meme like an idiot.

And, again, my argument is that even if a True Conservative hates Hillary, they should acknowledge that based on their political positions, Hillary is more conservative than Trump on a number of issues including foreign policy, trade and healthcare. I think a True Conservative should either vote Hillary or Gary Johnson if that is the choice.

majorspark;1779799 wrote:And don't forget those who call themselves progressives. Progressively leading us through the stages of socialism.