ptown_trojans_1;1778925 wrote:Yeah, saying Trump is more liberal than Hilliary is a hell of a stretch.
Trump is not a liberal or conservative, he is just Trump, a mesh of all them. We know he is not a conservative, the NRO killed him on it.
I do have one observation one Trump, which I hope the R's on here can square.
Trump's main thesis is he is the savior to make America great again. Only he can work to lead and make us great again.
Now, I heard that before...in 2008 with Obama. He used the same broad rhetoric about changing Washington, making us great, turning us away from the previous eight years.
What is the difference between Obama wanting to do things with executive power and Trump saying pretty much the same thing?
Why is it ok for the R's to have a strong armed guy that he is the only one that can do things, and yet it was not ok with Obama?
Or, are you betting more that Trump will find a way to work with Congress where Obama has not been able to?
I'm trying to square the two.
To me, Trump seems to be reaching for the same Executive power that R's destroy Obama on.
Coming from a conservative leaning libertarian (conservative on fiscal policies, libertarian on social/foreign policies), I don't want Trump at all.
However, if I had to choose between him and Hillary/Sanders I will unfortunately make that choice.
Now, to answer your question...
POTUS unilateral power through E.O.s is bad no matter what side of the aisle has power. I do, however, see Trump as more able to work with Congress than Obama has. Obama honestly has not compromised on one single thing in 7 years. It has been his way or the highway (and then he complains about Congress just being a "say no" Congress).
I am not sure Trump would be one to compromise much either, but he would be closer to what those in Congress believe in, so more may get done.
The main reason Clinton was a MUCH better POTUS than Obama was that he was willing to listen to the other side and make compromises. Look at the balanced budget deals he worked with the Rs that owned Congress at the time (of course, after he tried to get through his terrible spending spree in and failed). At least he was willing to change/work with the other side.