ohiobucks1;1611826 wrote:I think we take Watson.

I'd rather trade down and take Evans.

HighRoller74;1611827 wrote:McShay and Kiper did a 3 round mock today alternating picks.

Cleveland came away with JFF, Bruce Ellington (WR, SC) Bradley Roby, Bishop Sankey (RB Washington)

FW hands can go back in your pants.

COA, amazingly they had 9 WR's going in the First Round.

Which naturally means like 4 will be drafted in round 1, and I'll lose the wager lol

HighRoller74;1611776 wrote:No he hasn't.

Also, Kiper had Locker ranked #1 in his initial rankings for that year, as did everyone else, and through out the the year when he regressed, he was dropped down the list.

Footwedge;1611835 wrote:Nobody...I mean nobody had him rated anywhere near that high. The guy was injury prone to boot. Locker was not an accurate passer and ONLY Mel, had him even going in the first round.

Terry_Tate;1611850 wrote:I'm finding it hard to criticize Mel if he was the only person who had him going first round and Locker went 8th. Doesn't that mean he did better with him than anyone else? Maybe I'm wrong, but his job is to predict the Draft, not necessarily who will be great.

And also I think everyone thought Locker would be a bust. He was all hype for years in college because of his physical tools but never had the results to back them up.

SportsAndLady;1611853 wrote:So according to my sources (/BR'd), and NO ONE should anything I say as gospel, but..

-browns are throwing out smoke screens and are dead set on taking a tackle at 4
-they don't like Watkins because he loves the weed (arrested in '12), and they don't want him to corrupt Gordon.
-farmer and haslam are very well respected in the organization. Very nice people who know what the fuck they are doing.


My source works for the browns.

SportsAndLady;1611851 wrote:You're definitely not wrong. I also lol'd very hard.

"Kiper is such an idiot, he was the only one who correctly predicted locker going in the first round"

SportsAndLady;1611853 wrote:So according to my sources (/BR'd),

Sonofanump;1606331 wrote:Clowney, Watkins, trade back a few spots, Mack, Bortles in that order.

like_that;1611866 wrote:More respected as oppose to previous regimes?

What does your friend do for the browns?

BR1986FB;1611868 wrote:Can't get me out of your head, ehh stupid fuck? Obsessed much?

SportsAndLady;1611874 wrote:Lol take it easy

GoChiefs;1611879 wrote:Congrats. You got him to post on the Browns thread again.

SportsAndLady;1611873 wrote:Yes opposed to previous regimes. Said chud was the worst, just the worst social skills ever. Said he probably would have kept his job but he was so awkward and never fit well with the new higher ups so they canned him.

Ill pm you his position when I get to a computer, I don't want to give away his identity.

SportsAndLady;1611873 wrote:Yes opposed to previous regimes. Said chud was the worst, just the worst social skills ever. Said he probably would have kept his job but he was so awkward and never fit well with the new higher ups so they canned him.

Ill pm you his position when I get to a computer, I don't want to give away his identity.

Classyposter58;1611900 wrote:Does anyone else on here think Clowney is going to be a huge bust?

like_that;1611898 wrote:Hurry up and send that pm!!!!

SportsAndLady;1611907 wrote:Lol I don't have to..I won't even be by a computer until Tuesday. In Ohio for the weekend.

When I worked at Rutgers my boss just moved there from the browns, where he was their ticket sales manager for 4 years. He gave me a contact there because I wanted to get some info on season tix and I just stayed in touch with the guy. He has a different position now though.

I'm not saying believe me because the guy probably doesn't know what is actually going on, but I just thought id share.

Not sure id like a tackle at 4 but it's better than taking Watkins IMO.

like_that;1611910 wrote:We take robinson at 4 and a QB at 26, I am willing to bet we will all be happy in a couple years with the 2014 draft.