IggyPride00;1548910 wrote:I also have to wonder why if you're the Mariners you offer the guy an extra $65 million over his next best offer.
It has been reported for a while the Yankees weren't going to go over $175 million. If you're Seattle, why not top out at say $200 million or so knowing there was no one else in play anywhere near that number?
If Robby Cano can get 10/240 at age 31, what in the world does Mike Trout get when he hits the market in 2017 at age 26?
The way things are going Trout should blow well past $350 million on probably a 12-13 year deal. I am now convinced some team is dumb enough to do that kind of deal.
There were reports that the dodgers offered Kershaw 300 million...
The Los Angeles Dodgers offered star pitcher Clayton Kershaw a “lifetime contract” worth about $300 million earlier this season,
ESPN’s Buster Olney is reporting.
The two sides did not finish negotiations because Kershaw was uncertain about committing to such an “encompassing” deal and about
having contract talks during the season, but talks progressed enough that a deal could be finalized this winter, according to the report.
Kershaw, 25, who has led MLB in ERA in each of the past three seasons, is eligible for free agency after the 2015 season. He made $11 million in 2013 during the second year of a two-year, $19-million deal, and is entering his final year of arbitration.
Um. Someone offers me 300 million dollars you sign that SOB immediately...in blood if there are no pens around!