As a Steelers fan, I admit bias in the whole thing. Strong "I HATE INDY AND WANT THEM TO FAIL AND POSSIBLY LOSE A COUPLE OF KNEES IN THE PROCESS" bias.Glory Days wrote: i dont see what the big deal is. would you rather see what Painter can do now in a real NFL game or later in the playoffs if Manning gets hurt? i think its stupid not to put in the second stringers in a game where the opponent is going 100%, not like a in preseason game. and who said they arent playing to win? you shoud be confident you can win no matter who you have on the field. i can imagine the crap the colts would get if Manning goes down in week 17 and they have to start Painter in 2 weeks.
But the simple truth is that during the Manning era there, they have failed all three times they've had a first-round bye, losing their FIRST playoff game each time (99-00, 05-06, 07-08). When you're either the first or second team in your conference, going one-and-done should never be acceptable. I don't recall the 99-00 stuff off the top of my head, but I recall they shut things down a week or so early in both of the other two years. That's the sort of thing that might raise warning signs if I'm associated with this team.
The year Manning won a Super Bowl? They were the third seed. No first round bye. I think they just overthink the whole, "But what if someone gets hurt?!?" thing and take their team out of the rhythm that got them a first-round bye, leading to them getting upset when they finally get back on the field. If that happens this year, I'll be happily having a Mercury Morris champagne toast in front of my TV.