jordo212000;811945 wrote:Hate the Thompson pick at number 4. Didn't impress me.
Cavs could have got the most value by picking Williams number 1 and getting Knight at 4
I'll take this as a good sign as you know nothing about basketball.
jordo212000;811945 wrote:Hate the Thompson pick at number 4. Didn't impress me.
Cavs could have got the most value by picking Williams number 1 and getting Knight at 4
sleeper;811944 wrote:It's not a weak draft. Every year we here about weak drafts. I bet 2003 was also considered a weak draft, lol.
sleeper;811949 wrote:I'll take this as a good sign as you know nothing about basketball.
Almost every year in the 2000's theres at least been a sure fire franchise #1 type player. This year may be decent with overall talent, but the cream of the crop certainly doesnt look to be very goodsleeper;811944 wrote:It's not a weak draft. Every year we here about weak drafts. I bet 2003 was also considered a weak draft, lol.
Hb31187;811953 wrote:Almost every year in the 2000's theres at least been a sure fire franchise #1 type player. This year may be decent with overall talent, but the cream of the crop certainly doesnt look to be very good
jordo212000;811945 wrote:Hate the Thompson pick at number 4. Didn't impress me.
Cavs could have got the most value by picking Williams number 1 and getting Knight at 4
sleeper;811960 wrote:Do you have a link that none of these players will be a franchise #1 type player? None of these guys have played a minute in the NBA, and last time I checked, guys like Oden, Kwame Brown, etc have all busted out.
The point is, you can judge how weak a draft is maybe 5 years from now. You've been HOODWINKED by the media, and it goes to show that none of you think for yourself and just follow whatever garbage is spewed to you on ESPN.
Hb31187;811963 wrote:Lol yes ive been brainwashed by ESPN, you got me. Want a link to that?
Who?Midstate01;811982 wrote:I think he's better then wall right now. Hands down.
True. But you and I talking about it is one thing, Grant has to be prepared for this sort of thing. Didn't seem like they had a backup plan once the Jazz picked KanterHate the Thompson pick at number 4. Didn't impress me.
Cavs could have got the most value by picking Williams number 1 and getting Knight at 4
Not a big fan of it myself, but utah really fucked us. We had to do what we had to if we couldnt get good value for the pick.
As for picking williams first, them knight at #4.... hindsight is always 20/20
Hb31187;811978 wrote:The last 3 #1 players drafted? Wall, Griffin and Rose were all pegged as Franchise type players. Irving is good,very good. But people arent speaking nearly as highly of him as they did those players I just listed
The last four have all had guys that were labeled as franchise changers.sleeper;811969 wrote:Okay, can you tell me which picks in the past years have been consensus #1 franchise type players? Give me the last 5 years.
jordo212000;811989 wrote:True. But you and I talking about it is one thing, Grant has to be prepared for this sort of thing. Didn't seem like they had a backup plan once the Jazz picked Kanter
sleeper;811993 wrote:Wall sucks, how about Barnagni, Oden, Bogut? I'll give your Rose and Griffin, but outside of them there hasn't been that type of player since Dwight in 2004. Have you looked at recent draft history? Lot's of garbage players were selected in the lottery the past 5-6 years, I don't think this draft is any weaker than any other draft.
Huh?Wall sucks
Hb31187;811996 wrote:Wall sucks?
16. 8 and 5 as a rookie Pg sucks, you're serious? Thats about exactly what D rose put up....
wes_mantooth;812000 wrote:well it is euro heavy and most of us aren't familiar with the foreign players, so it doesn't have the marquee names...that is for sure.
sleeper;812004 wrote:Yes, and on a bad team.
Maybe I'm wrong, I don't know. Just looking at some of the film, he doesn't seem like much of a difference maker. They should have traded that pickTrue. But you and I talking about it is one thing, Grant has to be prepared for this sort of thing. Didn't seem like they had a backup plan once the Jazz picked Kanter
Yes they did, his name was Tristan Thompson. There was a reason he was a late edition to the Williams/Kanter workout