2kool4skool;811889 wrote:How do you explain the win later in the season?
BR1986FB;811891 wrote:That's funny because the Cavs at, I believe, 7-9 were far from the 2nd worst team in the league at that point. That loss sent them into a downward spiral.
Because anything can happen, bad teams upset good teams all the time. I'm unsure of what you're getting at though, as that's all pretty obvious. If anything, speaks to the fact that perhaps they were MORE motivated to beat Lebron/The Heat.wildcats20;811897 wrote:How do you explain the win if the talent differential was so overwhelming?
2kool4skool;811898 wrote:This is nothing more than trying to play sports-psychologist. The facts are, taking the large sample size of the season, the Cavs were one of, if not they worst team in the league, and the Heat were one of the best. And it's not surprising at al they'd get blown out by them. What is surprising is that they actually won a game against them, so be happy.
2kool4skool;811889 wrote: Oh okay, so that's the one exception to the rule. Got it :rolleyes:
2kool4skool;811898 wrote: Because anything can happen, bad teams upset good teams all the time. I'm unsure of what you're getting at though, as that's all pretty obvious. If anything, speaks to the fact that perhaps they were MORE motivated to beat Lebron/The Heat.
BR1986FB;811909 wrote:Nice spin...:rolleyes:
2kool4skool;811911 wrote:If you asked someone to look at the talent levels of each roster, and the cumulative results of the season, you honestly believe they should expect the Cavs to beat the Heat even one time? Much less twice?
I'm quite happy with how the team performed against the Heat, one win was one more than I expected they'd get.
2kool4skool;811911 wrote:If you asked someone to look at the talent levels of each roster, and the cumulative results of the season, you honestly believe they should expect the Cavs to beat the Heat even one time? Much less twice?
I'm quite happy with how the team performed against the Heat, one win was one more than I expected they'd get.
wes_mantooth;811914 wrote:The team laid down and took it up the ass in the only game the fan base cared about for the whole season. Do you remember how big of a deal that game was to the fan base? JJ and others were joking around with lebron and clowning...it was ridiculous. No one really gave a shit about the second game...the season had been lost. You can spin it however you want, but that team laid down and took an ass whooping of epic proportions when the city needed them to perform.
Then the next time they came to Cleveland "his boys" manned up, played physical(can remember James getting knocked to the ground multiple times) and they beat the heat and really controlled most of the game. I can give them a one game pass. Plus, jj, andy, and gibson werent guarding lebronBR1986FB;811913 wrote:At the point they played (December 2nd) the Cavs were playing well, and I don't think the Heat really were. I'd have to check their record but I don't think it was much better. Lebron's "boys" were intimidated by him, they laid down for him and they let him act like a fucking clown on THEIR home court.
Hb31187;811920 wrote:The jokin around part I can see why itd upset the fans. But getting beat by a much better team doesnt mean they laid down to me. But im looking at it from a different perspective than Cleveland fans.
Pick6;811919 wrote:Then the next time they came to Cleveland "his boys" manned up, played physical(can remember James getting knocked to the ground multiple times) and they beat the heat and really controlled most of the game. I can give them a one game pass. Plus, jj, andy, and gibson werent guarding lebron
Again, it's nothing more than playing e-sports psychologist to believe it's attributable to something other than the extreme talent differential between the two teams. They got blown out even worse by the Lakers, it doesn't mean they laid down, it means they sucked and the Lakers were really good.wes_mantooth;811914 wrote:The team laid down and took it up the ass in the only game the fan base cared about for the whole season.
2kool4skool;811929 wrote:Again, it's nothing more than playing e-sports psychologist to believe it's attributable to something other than the extreme talent differential between the two teams. They got blown out even worse by the Lakers, it doesn't mean they laid down, it means they sucked and the Lakers were really good.
And why would a fan of the team only care about the first game against the Heat? I'm happier they won later in the season, shows that perhaps they progressed and were able to beat the Heat even after they had "gelled."
But obviously I'm not going to convince you that JJ/whoever else will play hard against Lebron, or whoever else they may be friends with in the league. And it's seemingly the direction Gilbert has decided to go in as well. So I'll just move on.
Back to the Thompson pick, it's appearing more and more like we didn't draft him for Charlotte. Clearly there needs to be some movement to make him fit in at all with the current roster. If it's Hickson that goes, hopefully we can get good value for JJ, it's always a big risk trading away a, somewhat, proven commodity and one of your best players, for an unproven guy.
What are some of the potential destinations for JJ? Any rumblings of him/others being on the move tonight?
