posted by Laley23Oh ok. Yeah, I have a group text with some buddies and we all agreed by about episode 3 that William was Man in Black, but yeah, last year was much less obvious. Bernard/Arnold being a host on the other hand was way too predictable.
I actually didn't think Barnard was obvious, not for a while anyway....and the problem is it basically told the viewer there are no rules and you have no idea what's true or real, nor do the characters (with maybe one or two exceptions). So any assumptions you had, at that point, were seriously in doubt. Unless, I'm sure, you watched multiple times with the eye of a detective and saw extremely subtle clues. I think the last few episodes cleared all that up...or did they really?