posted by CenterBHSFan
As far as I know, people are still getting banned on Twitter for linking the NYP story. Perhaps if the left didn't create The Streisand Effect, it wouldn't be so concerning for half the country. When you censor news, doesn't matter if you agree or not, people in general don't appreciate it. And it's being done right before an election, that makes it exponentially worse. These are facts. What is happening is not a conspiracy theory, it is happening.
It's truly astounding. The money Hunter got from Ukraine and China doesn't seem to be disputed by anyone, least of all the Bidens. That alone should be cause for MAJOR concern from everyone screaming "Russia! Russia! Russia!" for 4 years.
I believe Ratliff confirmed the FBI has the laptop, which is inappropriate, but as sitting DNI he is a credible figure in the know. This is a new thing with the left when a Admin official says something they don't like they accuse him of lying for Trump (they prefer instead to quote "sources" with dubious stories about Trump off the record). If Ratliff did this post-office on Fox or some other right wing outlet, ala Brennan/Comey/Clapper, then OK grain of salt. But to cite Adam Schiff - who is a proven liar second possibly to only Trump - saying the laptop is Russian disinformation with no evidence of that over Ratliff is not journalism, it's a cover-up.
Then on top of that, you have Bobulinski and another guy who have gone on the record and provided corroborating evidence. Now the one guy is a criminal, and Bobulinski might have an ax to grind. But by what standard is all this deemed fake Russian disinformation and suppressed?!? Certainly not any standard applied to Trump, not remotely. Fox has allegedly confirmed Bobulinski was interviewed by the FBI and phones examined - and still not newsworthy?!? There's a lot of decidely un-fake aspects to this story.
Granted, the Hunter money angle wasn't been suppressed previously. And the laptop is very questionable, but Ratliff does add credibility and make it newsworthy. What was the standard applied to Comey or Bolton and many others? Then we have named witnesses on the record. So you have a dossier-like thing at the center of this story, and the whole story gets suppressed? Where were the fact checkers on Russia? Where was the suppression of the fake stories from the dossier?
Finally, how are Adam Schiff and other hacks allowed to claim the laptop is Russian disinformation without providing proof? Are those stories being suppressed? If the laptop doesn't exist, how can it be Russian disinformation? And if emails are corroborated on the record - mind you, by people who legitimately possess them (a.k.a not leaked or stolen) - then the laptop isn't even the center of the story any more.
I'm just shocked. This is literally something you expect from communist China. Now I haven't seen much that's new [and relevant] information, just confirmation and that Biden probably lied about knowing about Hunter's dealings (which, of course he did!). So it's fascinating that the laptop triggered this, and that the laptop is why it's still being censored. But Bobulinksi is the story now, not the laptop. And there's no evidence I've seen that he's not credible. He may have a giant grudge, but if he were making any of this up that's a huge personal risk to take, and for what? The laptop is irrelevant - Bobulinski has validated the key aspects of the story. How many stories run on Don Jr. and Eric? Yet that same media practically ignores the Hunter fiasco. There was more coverage of Ivanka's patent for voting machines in China than Hunter. That's just a fucking disgrace.