LOL
I see where CNN has failed to use the word "riot" in their news. Still calling these protests.
Imagine that.
So the NY Times pulls a US Senators OP ED because they say it doesnt meet " their standards" but they ran OP EDs for the Taliban, Putin, Maduro and those were fine?
The media in this country is screwing all of us. Both sides. The left has lost all credibility (most media) and the right wont e objective about trying to tell the POTUS to STFU on most stuff.
posted by SpockThe media in this country is screwing all of us. Both sides. The left has lost all credibility (most media) and the right wont e objective about trying to tell the POTUS to STFU on most stuff.
Are you feeling OK, or did your account get hacked?
When do we get to hear Greta Thunberg's take on how to prevent police violence?
posted by Dr Winston O'BoogieWhen do we get to hear Greta Thunberg's take on how to prevent police violence?
It will be interesting to see if the "expert" Covid-19 models have any impact on people's blind faith in long-range projections of much, much more complex climate models with infinitely more data problems.
LOL, the climate change budget was apparently the first thing to go in Brazil in order to fund their pandemic response.
posted by gutIt will be interesting to see if the "expert" Covid-19 models have any impact on people's blind faith in long-range projections of much, much more complex climate models with infinitely more data problems.
LOL, the climate change budget was apparently the first thing to go in Brazil in order to fund their pandemic response.
HOW DARE YOU?!!!
Lol “individuals”
Individuals with a cervix are now recommended to start cervical cancers screening at 25 and continue through age 65, with HPV testing every five years as the preferred method of testing, according to a new guideline released by the American Cancer Society https://t.co/gUhYdIIx69
— CNN (@CNN) July 30, 2020
posted by iclfan2Lol “individuals”
Individuals with a cervix are now recommended to start cervical cancers screening at 25 and continue through age 65, with HPV testing every five years as the preferred method of testing, according to a new guideline released by the American Cancer Society https://t.co/gUhYdIIx69
— CNN (@CNN) July 30, 2020
Show us where the words hurt you
posted by SportsAndLadyShow us where the words hurt you
Ha sorry for pointing out in the CNN thread that CNN lives in a fantasy world where anyone other than women have a Cervix.
One of CNN's anchors with a cervix was interviewing a Trump admin health professional last week in an afternoon interview. Because the interviewee was making complete sense the anchor with the cervix was relegated to simply and literally calling him a liar, more than once. It was among the most pathetic and disgusting displays of media bias I have ever heard; I was literally embarrassed for the anchor with a cervix for making a complete fool and witch of herself. Incredibly pathetic.
posted by QuakerOatsOne of CNN's anchors with a cervix was interviewing a Trump admin health professional last week in an afternoon interview. Because the interviewee was making complete sense the anchor with the cervix was relegated to simply and literally calling him a liar, more than once. It was among the most pathetic and disgusting displays of media bias I have ever heard; I was literally embarrassed for the anchor with a cervix for making a complete fool and witch of herself. Incredibly pathetic.
Seems like a lot of extra un-needed effort to post CNN sucks.
posted by iclfan2Ha sorry for pointing out in the CNN thread that CNN lives in a fantasy world where anyone other than women have a Cervix.
No need for an apology. For the non sensitive posters, we see the hilarity of CNN being afraid to say “women.”
posted by QuakerOatsOne of CNN's anchors with a cervix was interviewing a Trump admin health professional last week in an afternoon interview. Because the interviewee was making complete sense the anchor with the cervix was relegated to simply and literally calling him a liar, more than once. It was among the most pathetic and disgusting displays of media bias I have ever heard; I was literally embarrassed for the anchor with a cervix for making a complete fool and witch of herself. Incredibly pathetic.
I've asked you this before with no response, but I'll try again: Why do you watch CNN? I don't watch the Home & Garden Network. I don't like the stuff they talk about. My mother-in-law is devoted to it and I hate hearing about if from her. I know if I turn it on, they'll be talking about ways to arrange the wooden spoon holder on your kitchen counter so that it looks great. I don't want to hear about shit like that. So I have made the decision not to watch. As for you, you know CNN is going to piss you off, yet you seem to tune in quite regularly. I have no way of verifying it, but I would guess that upward of half of CNN viewers are angry conservatives looking for more material to complain about. But in the grand scheme of things, CNN is a gnat turd on the sidewalk of life. You are giving it way more influence than it deserves by watching so much. Go out and listen to the birds instead. Tribe's playing well, so there's also that to follow.
Funny how cnn.com has no reference to The Epstein madam who arranged for Bill CLinton to fondle little girls, you would think that was a HUGE story
posted by Dr Winston O'BoogieLOL....Same goes for Fox and liberal viewers. I've actually seen libs comment on a Fox segment I watched, and it was like "whuh?!? that's not what happened". Not quite as bad as imagining something that didn't happen, but they did fixate on 10% of the segment when the rest of it invalidated their rant. The rightwing viewpoint so melted them down that they didn't even hear, apparently, the two moderate plus the leftwing views.I have no way of verifying it, but I would guess that upward of half of CNN viewers are angry conservatives looking for more material to complain about.
posted by gut
LOL....Same goes for Fox and liberal viewers. I've actually seen libs comment on a Fox segment I watched, and it was like "whuh?!? that's not what happened". Not quite as bad as imagining something that didn't happen, but they did fixate on 10% of the segment when the rest of it invalidated their rant. The rightwing viewpoint so melted them down that they didn't even hear, apparently, the two moderate plus the leftwing views.
I'm sure you're right.