SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Mar 25, 2010 6:28pm
Alright. Take him out and watch Dwight Howard's FG% go up to about 80%. I'll take my chances with Shaq making 50% of his FT's...Footwedge wrote:Yeah right Shemp. Have Shaq on the floor up 2 with in crunch time during a playoff game. Thank God you aren't the coach. You are an idiot.ytownfootball wrote: Shaq wasn't acquired to go through the motions during the regular season and ride the pine during crunch time during the fucking play-offs moron.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Mar 25, 2010 6:28pm
Look it up, frat boy. You and your your pud whackin toadies made your claim, and I refuted it. AC was wrong. Look it up. Until you do, I'm done with you.SQ_Crazies wrote: And since I don't play this game like you do, I'll answer your question.
Yes, that was the biggest thing last year. Guess what? This year they've done well against the top teams in the league--very well. Last year they did beat plenty of sub .500 teams. But a franchise record is a franchise record--it means they're doing something better than they ever have in the history of the franchise. So I asked a simple question, which I believe is true but I'm not going to spend the time to look up because I don't care that much. This year's team is better, period. I don't need that stat to hold onto this argument.
And again, if you're picking the Cavs to win the title and you don't think they're better than they were last year--then you don't make a whole lot of sense.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Mar 25, 2010 6:29pm
Why don't you switch teams? Its very obvious that you're having a hard time dealing with success in Cleveland. I notice the trend in the OSU hoops forum also. Glass empty kinda guy eh?
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Mar 25, 2010 6:29pm
Anything else you'd like to say to make an ass out of yourself?
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Mar 25, 2010 6:30pm
Don't make Howard out to be something he isn't. You are just as stupid as your butt buddy Shemp in Y Town.SQ_Crazies wrote:Alright. Take him out and watch Dwight Howard's FG% go up to about 80%. I'll take my chances with Shaq making 50% of his FT's...Footwedge wrote:Yeah right Shemp. Have Shaq on the floor up 2 with in crunch time during a playoff game. Thank God you aren't the coach. You are an idiot.ytownfootball wrote: Shaq wasn't acquired to go through the motions during the regular season and ride the pine during crunch time during the fucking play-offs moron.
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Mar 25, 2010 6:31pm
Soooo...Howard isn't the best center in the league?
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Mar 25, 2010 6:32pm
Truly relevant. You sure are slick, aintcha pard?Automatik wrote: Why don't you switch teams? Its very obvious that you're having a hard time dealing with success in Cleveland. I notice the trend in the OSU hoops forum also. Glass empty kinda guy eh?
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Mar 25, 2010 6:35pm
Show me a stat where he shoots 80% from the field, you cocksucker. Same old shit. Throw some unfactual crap on the wall and see what sticks.SQ_Crazies wrote: Soooo...Howard isn't the best center in the league?
Logical people play the percentages. Brownie is a logical person. Shaq will have his ass parked on the bench...in the playoffs...during crunch time. Learn to deal with it.
Trueblue23
Posts: 7,463
Mar 25, 2010 6:37pm
Settle down Footwedge, would hate to smack you around with the ban hammer 
Fab4Runner
Posts: 6,196
Mar 25, 2010 6:39pm
Are you a child footwedge? You toss out more immature insults than my adolescent cousins.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Mar 25, 2010 6:39pm
Don't make claims that you can't factually back up. It's that simple.SQ_Crazies wrote: I'm not going to waste my time looking up stats because you're too big of a prick to read my posts anyways. Plus you'd probably come up with some "per half-second" stats that "prove me wrong" anyways. Since any stat you look up is automatically more relevant than anything else--because you looked it up. Doesn't really matter what they say..
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Mar 25, 2010 6:42pm
LOL, I didn't make the claim, I asked a question...
hangonsloopy
Posts: 1,291
Mar 25, 2010 8:28pm
wow, footy is hitting an all time low. Why do you people respond to his nonsense?
D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Mar 25, 2010 8:51pm
Meltdown
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Mar 25, 2010 8:52pm
2008-2009: Cavs were 32-12 against +.500 teams & 34-4 against teams with .500 or less records
2009-2010: Cavs are 28-11 against +.500 teams & 29-4 against teams with .500 or less records
The difference this year is the Cavs are beating the top +.500 teams(Lakers, Celtics, Orlando).
*This takes into account the record of the team at the time of the game*
2009-2010: Cavs are 28-11 against +.500 teams & 29-4 against teams with .500 or less records
The difference this year is the Cavs are beating the top +.500 teams(Lakers, Celtics, Orlando).
*This takes into account the record of the team at the time of the game*
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Mar 25, 2010 8:55pm
There you go. Thank you for doing the research, I wasn't in the mood to do it for Wedge.
29-4, and is it correct that we've won 23 or 24 of those in a row now? A franchise record. So we don't have any more losses than we did last year--and they all happened early in the season.
Numbers don't lie bitch.
29-4, and is it correct that we've won 23 or 24 of those in a row now? A franchise record. So we don't have any more losses than we did last year--and they all happened early in the season.
Numbers don't lie bitch.
jpake1
Posts: 2,389
Mar 25, 2010 9:27pm
You just called another guy a bitch. Oh snap.
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Mar 25, 2010 9:32pm
23 straight. There are only 2 teams that have beaten the Cavs that are currently under .500, Chicago & Washington.
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Mar 25, 2010 9:38pm
Hahaha another FootWedge theory proven false.
And I'm the one who throws shit on the wall to see what sticks...haha.
And I'm the one who throws shit on the wall to see what sticks...haha.
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Mar 25, 2010 9:40pm
Oh I almost forgot...
In before FW comes back with combined record per minute sub .500 team production based on the combination of Hollinger's PER and the standard deviation of total games played in a season. All multiplied by 2 and divided by the square root of pi which clearly shows that last year's sub. 500 teams were stronger than this years.
In before FW comes back with combined record per minute sub .500 team production based on the combination of Hollinger's PER and the standard deviation of total games played in a season. All multiplied by 2 and divided by the square root of pi which clearly shows that last year's sub. 500 teams were stronger than this years.
Trueblue23
Posts: 7,463
Mar 25, 2010 9:50pm
You guys finished yet? lol
D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Mar 25, 2010 9:51pm
HahaTrueblue23 wrote: You guys finished yet? lol
Yea right.
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Mar 25, 2010 9:59pm
There really are stupid questions.Trueblue23 wrote: You guys finished yet? lol
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Mar 25, 2010 10:03pm
The East is garbage compared to last year? Really?Footwedge wrote:How do you figure the East is better this year? The East is garbage compared to last year.LTrain23 wrote:Nope. Because you can't compare teams from different years. Too many things change. The East is much better this season, as is the West.Footwedge wrote:LTrain23 wrote: Winning % > everything.
This is what I've been trying to tell you for the last month. Happy to see that you've finally caught on. Last year's team was slightly better in this regard.
Secondly, I'm only comparing winning % this year. We're winning at a much greater clip with Antawn than w/o.
If we go on to win the championship, this team is >>>>>>>>> than last years.
And please stop with the Jamison crap increasing our winning percentage. Do you honestly believe that he is responsible for that?
The East this year will have FOUR teams over 50 wins. Last season they had 3.
Last season, the 5th seed in the east had a 43-39 record.
This season currently, the 5th seed has a 39-30 record.
Last season, the East had two teams at 41-41 as the 6th and 7th seeds. This season, the 6th and 7th seeds are currently 37-34.
Last season, the 8th seed in the East was 39-43. This season, the 8th seed is 35-35.
jpake1
Posts: 2,389
Mar 25, 2010 10:07pm
I really do think Footwedge isn't serious and he's getting suck a kick out of this. I can't phathom a poster saying such stupid stuff at times. But then again, I can't phathom a poster typing all this shit just for shits and giggles.