Yep. Been on the bandwagon since birth. skank should worry about another ass-whipping from Big Red.skank wrote: Capones a bandwagon jumper anyway, let him be.
NOLTrain23 wrote: Capone, do you like the Pirates too?
Let's see here, if "Big Red" won the next 33 games against Massillon, YES....I said 33, the series would be tied.Al Capone wrote:Yep. Been on the bandwagon since birth. skank should worry about another ass-whipping from Big Red.skank wrote: Capones a bandwagon jumper anyway, let him be.
FACT: 8 > 6, DICKAl Capone wrote: Bring up facts and watch all the Brown fans scurry back into their little holes. hahaha
8??? Come on, man. You're better than that. Are you seriously counting 4 AAFC titles? It was an 8 team league and it is NOT recognized as the same as winning an NFL/AFL Championship. That's really reaching just to try and make your team look better. It's 6-4 in favor of Pittsburgh. How decent Cleveland fans can actually claim 4 AAFC titles as the equivalent of NFL/AFL titles is beyond me.BR1986FB wrote:FACT: 8 > 6, DICKAl Capone wrote: Bring up facts and watch all the Brown fans scurry back into their little holes. hahaha
Yes, they sucked......decades ago. It happened and nobody is ignoring that fact. The fact of the matter is though......the last 40 years have been GREAT. Should I ask some of you if you're trying to discount the overwhelming success of a franchise that has lasted approximately the same amount of time as their blatant ineptitude? Furthermore, I think we're still currently in Pittsburgh's successful run.ytownfootball wrote: The fact is it took Pittsburgh 39 years in the league to win a play-off game. 1933-1972
You're not seriously trying to discount the blatant ineptitude of a franchise that lasted nearly a generation?
You're the first to recognize it, and to your credit I'm not surprised.Yes, they sucked......decades ago. It happened and nobody is ignoring that fact.
ND had success? GTFO!!!if I was pulling the shit that some of you are pulling on here over on the college football board and throwing Notre Dame's old success
LOL. You're alright, man.ytownfootball wrote:You're the first to recognize it, and to your credit I'm not surprised.Yes, they sucked......decades ago. It happened and nobody is ignoring that fact.
ND had success? GTFO!!!if I was pulling the shit that some of you are pulling on here over on the college football board and throwing Notre Dame's old success
Wrong. Capone does.killer_ewok wrote:Yes, they sucked......decades ago. It happened and nobody is ignoring that fact.ytownfootball wrote: The fact is it took Pittsburgh 39 years in the league to win a play-off game. 1933-1972
You're not seriously trying to discount the blatant ineptitude of a franchise that lasted nearly a generation?
You're right. I should've said that we're not all ignoring that fact. My bad.HighRoller74 wrote:Wrong. Capone does.killer_ewok wrote:Yes, they sucked......decades ago. It happened and nobody is ignoring that fact.ytownfootball wrote: The fact is it took Pittsburgh 39 years in the league to win a play-off game. 1933-1972
You're not seriously trying to discount the blatant ineptitude of a franchise that lasted nearly a generation?
Don't act like you haven't killed a thread with some retarded argumentLJ wrote: This thread now sucks.
Good job.
A championship is a championship. We could also discount Super Bowl titles that were won in 14 game seasons with shorter playoffs but I wouldn't do that.killer_ewok wrote:8??? Come on, man. You're better than that. Are you seriously counting 4 AAFC titles? It was an 8 team league and it is NOT recognized as the same as winning an NFL/AFL Championship. That's really reaching just to try and make your team look better. It's 6-4 in favor of Pittsburgh. How decent Cleveland fans can actually claim 4 AAFC titles as the equivalent of NFL/AFL titles is beyond me.BR1986FB wrote:FACT: 8 > 6, DICKAl Capone wrote: Bring up facts and watch all the Brown fans scurry back into their little holes. hahaha
Also, I wouldn't refer to what you were talking about earlier as "selective memory." It's more like "living in the now."
Here and there, yes, but this is getting pretty constant and ridiculous.DeyDurkie5 wrote:Don't act like you haven't killed a thread with some retarded argumentLJ wrote: This thread now sucks.
Good job.
But the pissing matches seem to come down to ONE poster. I don't get on Steelers threads to start shit, although I did start the Roethlisberger thread. Get rid of that poster, problem SOLVED.LJ wrote:Here and there, yes, but this is getting pretty constant and ridiculous.DeyDurkie5 wrote:Don't act like you haven't killed a thread with some retarded argumentLJ wrote: This thread now sucks.
Good job.
so what, it's an internet message board. These things will happen, I mean you can't say don't argue on this site!LJ wrote:Here and there, yes, but this is getting pretty constant and ridiculous.DeyDurkie5 wrote:Don't act like you haven't killed a thread with some retarded argumentLJ wrote: This thread now sucks.
Good job.
BR1986FB wrote:But the pissing matches seem to come down to ONE poster. I don't get on Steelers threads to start shit, although I did start the Roethlisberger thread. Get rid of that poster, problem SOLVED.LJ wrote:Here and there, yes, but this is getting pretty constant and ridiculous.DeyDurkie5 wrote:Don't act like you haven't killed a thread with some retarded argumentLJ wrote: This thread now sucks.
Good job.
Those who know me from JJ's tend to know me to be pretty level headed but if a jackass (not you, LJ) wants to step up and start stupidity I'll cut off their fucking nuts and verbally feed them to them. We ALL know WHO that instigator/poster is.
There is a difference between arguing and being a troll.DeyDurkie5 wrote:so what, it's an internet message board. These things will happen, I mean you can't say don't argue on this site!LJ wrote:Here and there, yes, but this is getting pretty constant and ridiculous.DeyDurkie5 wrote:Don't act like you haven't killed a thread with some retarded argumentLJ wrote: This thread now sucks.
Good job.
