If A 16 Is Ever Going To Beat A 1 . . .

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ If A 16 Is Ever Going To Beat A 1 . . .
krambman's avatar

krambman

Senior Member

3,606 posts
Mar 17, 2010 3:47 PM
darbypitcher22 wrote:
trackandccrunner wrote: Pine Bluff being in this tourny just brings me back to the day of my old play station and when I had march madness 2003 they were the worst team in the game and I won the Championship with them on the hardest setting haha.
That's what makes games like that fun
And unrealistic. A good game would make it impossible for that to happen, no matter how good the player.
Mar 17, 2010 3:47pm
killer_ewok's avatar

killer_ewok

iRep

11,379 posts
Mar 20, 2010 1:14 AM
Syracuse 79 Vermont 56 Final
Mar 20, 2010 1:14am
krambman's avatar

krambman

Senior Member

3,606 posts
Mar 20, 2010 12:39 PM
It was still the second closest game for any #1 seed.
Mar 20, 2010 12:39pm
killer_ewok's avatar

killer_ewok

iRep

11,379 posts
Mar 20, 2010 1:11 PM
krambman wrote: It was still the second closest game for any #1 seed.
That's not saying much. LOL
Mar 20, 2010 1:11pm
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Mar 20, 2010 1:56 PM
krambman wrote: It was still the second closest game for any #1 seed.
that just shows how ridiculous it was for anyone to actually think a 16 would be a 1 this year. The 1s were way to good, and the 16s were pretty shitty.
Mar 20, 2010 1:56pm
reclegend22's avatar

reclegend22

Cool Hand Luke

8,772 posts
Mar 20, 2010 4:08 PM
Hard to believe KU took the longest to put its 16 away. I still think Kansas is the second best team in the tournament behind Syracuse (even though, of course, I have Duke standing on the ladder in Lucas Oil), but surprising nonetheless. I kept being taken back to 2002 and the Crusaders of Holy Cross in that one.
Mar 20, 2010 4:08pm