E
Eric Taylor
Posts: 602
Mar 15, 2010 8:58am
McCoy and Pike likely will be gone by the 3rd.
If they wait until the 3rd, Tebow or Snead are real possibilites.
If they wait until the 3rd, Tebow or Snead are real possibilites.
E
Eric Taylor
Posts: 602
Mar 15, 2010 9:00am
And nobody knows who for sure will be the starter, I would say it is a tossup right now.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 15, 2010 9:15am
Wooball wrote: Lefevour, Snead, Pike, Tebow ??? Would McCoy drop this far? Is there anyone else that I am missing that could be a target in those rounds?
All of these QB's could be available at the top of the 3rd round. If there's one they REALLY like at the the mid/bottom of that round they can always use a pick to trade up.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 15, 2010 9:17am
Only QB I'd consider in round 1 is Bradford. If Clausen fell to us I'd see if we could trade down.just_a_swimmer wrote: Espn draft guru's are now speculating the Browns will take a QB in this draft in round 1.
I dunno about that.
If Bradford stays healthy I really think he's going to be something special. If he locks into the right system I could see him having a Peyton Manning-like career.
E
Eric Taylor
Posts: 602
Mar 15, 2010 9:20am
It would be a shock right now if Bradford didnt go #1.
Cleveland already tried the Notre Dame QB thing and that didnt exactly work.
Cleveland already tried the Notre Dame QB thing and that didnt exactly work.
M
miller45452003
Posts: 673
Mar 15, 2010 9:40am
^^^I couldn't agree more on the second part of your post. No more "golden boys" from ND. We could be wrong about Clausen, but I highly doubt it. If you take Golden Tate and the other big WR(forget his name) out of the equation, he doesn't put up the numbers he did. JMO>>
thedynasty1998
Posts: 6,844
Mar 15, 2010 9:51am
That's not fair. Quinn dropped in the draft for a reason. No one was really high on him.Eric Taylor wrote: It would be a shock right now if Bradford didnt go #1.
Cleveland already tried the Notre Dame QB thing and that didnt exactly work.
Clausen can make all the throws and is a different QB. It's like saying no one should touch an OSU defensive lineman because Gholsten isn't doing well.
4cards
Posts: 2,551
Mar 15, 2010 10:07am
...If Tebow is around in the 3rd round ( I doubt he will be) but if he is, I'd take him and at least use him as a TE/back up QB.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 15, 2010 10:10am
Gil Brandt who is probably the most (or at least top 5) respected in the NFL among the (former) scouting ranks has told Holmgren that Colt McCoy will "make people forget about Joe Montana." I think that comment is a MAJOR stretch but I could see the Browns targeting McCoy at some point.
N
Nate
Posts: 3,949
Mar 15, 2010 10:12am
I'd rather have McCoy over Jimmy Boy.
C
Crimson_Streak
Posts: 172
Mar 15, 2010 12:30pm
i would rather have Clausen. he has a big arm (something quinn didnt have) and is a heck of a leader. clausen throws the best deep ball in the draft and can make every throw on the field. im just a little worried about bradfords shoulder and he ability to play under center
P
pkebker
Posts: 760
Mar 15, 2010 12:38pm
What's the scouting report on Snead? He might be a bit underrated...
M
Mr Pat
Posts: 519
Mar 15, 2010 12:48pm
You're right, because Notre Dame has never had a good QB... I do like the rock solid logic though, because Player A is from the same school as Player B, they must be the same type of player!miller45452003 wrote: ^^^I couldn't agree more on the second part of your post. No more "golden boys" from ND. We could be wrong about Clausen, but I highly doubt it. If you take Golden Tate and the other big WR(forget his name) out of the equation, he doesn't put up the numbers he did. JMO>>
krazie45
Posts: 1,055
Mar 15, 2010 12:50pm
Clausen is much better than Quinn. He has a stronger arm and is more accurate and though Tate and co. are good receiver they aren't what Quinn had in Stovall and Samardjia.
Should the Browns draft Crompton because Peyton Manning went to Tennessee?
Should the Browns draft Crompton because Peyton Manning went to Tennessee?
BCBulldog
Posts: 824
Mar 15, 2010 1:52pm
I like the sounds of that. A little out there with the Joe Montana comparison, but I would really like to see McCoy there when the Browns draft in the 2nd round. If not, I'm not sure there is a QB worth targeting until the fouth round at best.BR1986FB wrote: Gil Brandt who is probably the most (or at least top 5) respected in the NFL among the (former) scouting ranks has told Holmgren that Colt McCoy will "make people forget about Joe Montana." I think that comment is a MAJOR stretch but I could see the Browns targeting McCoy at some point.
KnightRyder
Posts: 1,428
Mar 15, 2010 3:05pm
imo quinn was better than clausen. but one thing is for certain , some people cant get enough of those golden domer busts.krazie45 wrote: Clausen is much better than Quinn. He has a stronger arm and is more accurate and though Tate and co. are good receiver they aren't what Quinn had in Stovall and Samardjia.
Should the Browns draft Crompton because Peyton Manning went to Tennessee?
just_a_swimmer
Posts: 674
Mar 15, 2010 3:25pm
I wish Quinn luck. He deserves a shot somewhere. I wish things would have worked out but it is obvious he needed a change of scenery as did the Browns. Quinn will probably turn out to be the second coming because that is just our luck.
krazie45
Posts: 1,055
Mar 15, 2010 6:07pm
Not sure how you came to that conclusion with actually watching the two play. Like I said, Clausen has a better arm and is more accurate but I guess Quinn had more team success.KnightRyder wrote:imo quinn was better than clausen. but one thing is for certain , some people cant get enough of those golden domer busts.krazie45 wrote: Clausen is much better than Quinn. He has a stronger arm and is more accurate and though Tate and co. are good receiver they aren't what Quinn had in Stovall and Samardjia.
Should the Browns draft Crompton because Peyton Manning went to Tennessee?
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Mar 15, 2010 6:53pm
blah blah blah..what qb that was a loser in college has ever done anything in the nfl?
krazie45
Posts: 1,055
Mar 15, 2010 10:15pm
John Elway never played in a bowl game...Pick6 wrote: blah blah blah..what qb that was a loser in college has ever done anything in the nfl?
OWNED
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
Mar 15, 2010 10:39pm
Correct, Elway was a sub .500 QB.krazie45 wrote:John Elway never played in a bowl game...Pick6 wrote: blah blah blah..what qb that was a loser in college has ever done anything in the nfl?
OWNED
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Mar 15, 2010 11:01pm
There is always an exception.
Writerbuckeye
Posts: 4,745
Mar 15, 2010 11:28pm
He answered your question -- it doesn't matter if it's an exception or not. YOU made it sound like there weren't any good ones and he proved you wrong.Pick6 wrote: There is always an exception.
M
Mr Pat
Posts: 519
Mar 15, 2010 11:29pm
Enter Clausen!Pick6 wrote: There is always an exception.
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Mar 15, 2010 11:38pm
Snead is garbage^2.pkebker wrote: What's the scouting report on Snead? He might be a bit underrated...