dear lindsay lohan

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Serious Business ▸ dear lindsay lohan
E

El Jefe Grande

Some Guy

425 posts
Mar 9, 2010 1:20 PM
Who is Lindsay Lohan?
Mar 9, 2010 1:20pm
september63's avatar

september63

Senior Member

5,789 posts
Mar 9, 2010 1:22 PM
She seems to be one of those celebs (quasi) that when their name begins falling from the tabloid pages, they either have a complete meltdown, or just do something stupid to keep their names on the pages of National Enquirer. Is her attorney the same one that sent you that letter Justin?
Mar 9, 2010 1:22pm
zambrown's avatar

zambrown

Senior Member

1,093 posts
Mar 9, 2010 1:34 PM
Little Danny wrote: When I think of Lohan the phrase AL- coholic comes to mind, not mik-coholic.


Exactly. What an idiot.
Mar 9, 2010 1:34pm
majorspark's avatar

majorspark

Senior Member

5,122 posts
Mar 9, 2010 1:34 PM
derek bomar wrote: go fuck yourself
I am sure she has quite a bit of experience with herself.
Mar 9, 2010 1:34pm
M

Manhattan Buckeye

Senior Member

7,566 posts
Mar 9, 2010 1:39 PM
Con_Alma wrote: She didn't compare herself to anyone. I didn't see her quoted anywhere in the article. Did I miss something?
To me it is worse than simply comparing, it is likely in a publicly filed document claiming malfeasance and damages (to the tune of $100M!). I haven't seen the filing so I don't know if Madonna or Oprah are mentioned specifically, but it would seem to me she would have had to make a claim like that considering how popular a name that Lindsey/Lindsay is today, certainly more popular than Susan - I don't know anyone under 35 years old named Susan.
Mar 9, 2010 1:39pm
september63's avatar

september63

Senior Member

5,789 posts
Mar 9, 2010 1:40 PM
Con_Alma wrote: She didn't compare herself to anyone. I didn't see her quoted anywhere in the article. Did I miss something?
Yes, you missed something. Her attorney said they cannot use the name Lindsay. Because Lindsay is a celebrity much like Oprah or Madonna. One name is all you need to know exactly who they are referring to.
Mar 9, 2010 1:40pm
C

Con_Alma

Senior Member

12,198 posts
Mar 9, 2010 2:13 PM
I don't think I did. Those were the words of her attorney to the press. I haven't found Ms. Lohan comparing herself to Oprah or Madonna.

I don't doubt for a minte that the attorney jumped on this opportunity.
Mar 9, 2010 2:13pm
september63's avatar

september63

Senior Member

5,789 posts
Mar 9, 2010 2:24 PM
In a lawsuit. The individual is attached to the attorney filing the suit. Dont be ridiculous. Would be like saying that JJHuddle and Bucknuts arent the assholes, their attorney that sent Justin the letter was the a-hole.
Mar 9, 2010 2:24pm
C

Con_Alma

Senior Member

12,198 posts
Mar 9, 2010 2:30 PM
Ridiculous? I'll try not to.

What I see is an attorney taking to the press an emphatic explanation of the reason for the suit being filed. I see an attorney giving examples to expand and clarify.

My attorney represents my position. My attorney may or may not use the examples and words I have in our discussions. Because of that I don't think it'sto ask if Ms. Lohan compared herself to Madonna and Oprah. I didn't see that anywhere...so I asked.
Mar 9, 2010 2:30pm
M

Manhattan Buckeye

Senior Member

7,566 posts
Mar 9, 2010 2:34 PM
The interesting thing is what arguments are in the brief that show why Li-Lo is so famous, it certainly isn't due her recent film career. I doubt this will go anywhere, there's as much potential embarassment for her than there is any chance of substantive recovery.
Mar 9, 2010 2:34pm
C

Con_Alma

Senior Member

12,198 posts
Mar 9, 2010 2:36 PM
Manhattan Buckeye wrote:... there's as much potential embarassment for her than there is any chance of substantive recovery.
...as were her attorney's comments. I agree. This will die.
Mar 9, 2010 2:36pm
Glory Days's avatar

Glory Days

Senior Member

7,809 posts
Mar 9, 2010 2:40 PM
gotta love how she went from this:


To this:
Mar 9, 2010 2:40pm
B

BCSbunk

Senior Member

972 posts
Mar 9, 2010 4:51 PM
BCBulldog wrote: Did any of you ever even once think that commercial was implying the Lindsay character was modeled after Lohan until you read this article? I know I didn't. She needs to just go away.
I have seen that commercial many times and not one single time have I thought of Lindsay Lohan.
Mar 9, 2010 4:51pm
THE4RINGZ's avatar

THE4RINGZ

R.I.P Thread Bomber

16,816 posts
Mar 9, 2010 4:52 PM
She was my favorite part of that Herbie movie I had to take my daughter to.
Mar 9, 2010 4:52pm
Z

ZombieKiller

Senior Member

817 posts
Mar 9, 2010 4:54 PM
If they said coked up baby named Lindsay..I would have to agree with her
Mar 9, 2010 4:54pm
Little Danny's avatar

Little Danny

Senior Member

4,288 posts
Mar 9, 2010 4:57 PM
Manhattan Buckeye wrote: The interesting thing is what arguments are in the brief that show why Li-Lo is so famous, it certainly isn't due her recent film career. I doubt this will go anywhere, there's as much potential embarassment for her than there is any chance of substantive recovery.
I thought what made Lohan famous was she did not wear any briefs.... (nyuk-nyuk) :D
Mar 9, 2010 4:57pm
september63's avatar

september63

Senior Member

5,789 posts
Mar 9, 2010 5:23 PM
and she alternately sucks mens private parts one day and womens private parts the next!
Mar 9, 2010 5:23pm
rookie_j70's avatar

rookie_j70

Senior Member

677 posts
Mar 9, 2010 6:22 PM
you serious clark?
Mar 9, 2010 6:22pm
Tigerfan00's avatar

Tigerfan00

Senior Member

3,427 posts
Mar 9, 2010 6:24 PM
Lindsay, dont you think $100M is a little to much drug money to ask for all at once.
Mar 9, 2010 6:24pm
M

Manhattan Buckeye

Senior Member

7,566 posts
Mar 9, 2010 6:29 PM
Tigerfan00 wrote: Lindsay, dont you think $100M is a little to much drug money to ask for all at once.
The $100M amount is equally incomprehensible as the claim. Without seeing the petition (the article has some general figures) I wonder how much, if any is due to lost employment opportunities...as if she's marketable now.
Mar 9, 2010 6:29pm
O

ou1980

Senior Member

877 posts
Mar 9, 2010 11:45 PM
Her lawyer may face fines from the California Bar....frivolous lawsuit
Mar 9, 2010 11:45pm