CenterBHSFan;1845514 wrote:Sleeper should not have to "back off" or anything of the sort. Not everybody has to like what he posts or his interchangeable opinions.

If other posters are allowed to debate ad nauseum, post only to target other posters without adding their own opinions and if others are allowed to post the same things over and over again - why in the world should Sleeper be singled out?
I just don't think that sets a good precdent, nor is it a good idea by any stretch of the imagination. I'm not a fan of choosing favorites.

*Edit to add*

Despite all that I've said above, I don't think that the name of the forum needs to change, either.

like_that;1845521 wrote:I don't think sleeper was banned from the politics forum, but I said it before and I will say it again I don't support a ban for sleeper. However, if he is going to post his bullshit, he better be ready to be called our for it. Everyone knows it's an act and everyone knows what sleeper's beliefs actually are. This forum is too small to try to bullshit everyone when you had 7+ years of a posting style prior to pulling the 180 troll job.

sleeper;1843512 wrote:I wasn't banned but I was asked to "cool down" the political rhetoric in the politics forum.

sleeper;1845468 wrote:Bump. I still see nothing has changed. Sad.

fish82;1845562 wrote:Agreed. You're still acting vaginal. Post or don't...no one cares either way. The QQ is unbecoming tho.

sleeper;1845772 wrote:Don't let this distract you from the fact that Donald Trump is a Republican.

isadore;1845876 wrote:Roger, Bill and Donald all feel at home at the forum's confines.

Dr Winston O'Boogie;1845943 wrote:I don't they post on here. Maybe I'm wrong.

isadore;1845945 wrote:gosh a ruddies, "I don't they post on here?" :RpS_drool: Of course they do under pseudonyms. You can easily spot them, Roger, Bill and Donald are the bigoted, selfserving, predatory alimebags in that forum. Oh I can see your confusion that is the description of all the Trumpites there.

isadore;1845876 wrote:gosh a ruddies why not use a synonym.
***** GRABBERs NEWS FORUM
Roger, Bill and Donald all feel at home at the forum's confines.

sleeper;1845957 wrote:I would support this. Those that voted for Trump are complicit in condoning ***** Grabbing.

isadore;1846017 wrote:gosh a ruddies and they stick together.
&#8220ersonally, I think he shouldn’t have settled,” Mr. Trump said in an interview in the Oval Office with Times reporters. “Because you should have taken it all the way; I don’t think Bill did anything wrong.”
“I think he’s a person I know well — he is a good person,” Mr. Trump said.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/business/media/trump-oreilly-fox-murdochs.html
Of course Donald didn't think he did anything wrong
***** grabbers of a feather just naturally flock together.

isadore;1845876 wrote:gosh a ruddies why not use a synonym.
***** GRABBERs NEWS FORUM
Roger, Bill and Donald all feel at home at the forum's confines.

sleeper;1846028 wrote:It's really a shame that during Sexual Assault Awareness month we have Mr. Sexual Assault condoning sexual assault.

You really can't make this stuff up. Republicans, the party of American values, LOL.

justincredible;1846030 wrote:Oh, whoops. I thought you were talking about Bill Clinton.

sleeper;1845957 wrote:I would support this. Those that voted for Trump are complicit in condoning ***** Grabbing.

QuakerOats;1846128 wrote:Actually I think they are the line of defense for America against the assault by the cultural Marxists on America.



Good day.

Heretic;1846138 wrote:The Amazingly Ignorant vs. The Cultural Marxists.

A battle where no one really wins.