Dr Winston O'Boogie
Posts: 1,799
Jun 29, 2017 2:49pm
This story is all over the web. He has been displaying these fake covers for years and they were clearly made to look real. They were displayed on walls along with covers of other magazines that featured him, and were real. FAKE NEWSSpock;1860802 wrote:Do we know if he was passing them off as real? Did he even know they were in there? If he did, would he even know if they were fake? I might just go with some left wing nutjob just planted them in those places recently then tipped the media to it.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Jun 29, 2017 3:28pm
Dr Winston O'Boogie;1860818 wrote:This story is all over the web.
Oh wow
Dr Winston O'Boogie
Posts: 1,799
Jun 29, 2017 4:16pm
I said the story is all over the web so that someone who wanted to know if these covers were being passed off as real could read about it and make an opinion.QuakerOats;1860826 wrote:Oh wow
Don't you find it ironic that the guy who cries about lies being told about him in the media uses the allusion of the media to perpetuate lies about himself?
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Jun 29, 2017 4:44pm
I guess it was time for the fake Russia narrative to die.
Dr Winston O'Boogie
Posts: 1,799
Jun 29, 2017 5:06pm
Maybe you ought to wait for he results of the investigation before you dismiss it. Certainly you are entitled to your opinion. But I don't remember any president who gets investigated like this not deny the accusation. We'll see.QuakerOats;1860839 wrote:I guess it was time for the fake Russia narrative to die.
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Jun 29, 2017 5:48pm
It'll end up just like the Plame investigation. The Special Counsel will find nothing, and end up indicting some low-level toady for lying about something stupid and unrelated to the case.Dr Winston O'Boogie;1860843 wrote:Maybe you ought to wait for he results of the investigation before you dismiss it. Certainly you are entitled to your opinion. But I don't remember any president who gets investigated like this not deny the accusation. We'll see.
Dr Winston O'Boogie
Posts: 1,799
Jun 29, 2017 5:57pm
We shall see.fish82;1860853 wrote:It'll end up just like the Plame investigation. The Special Counsel will find nothing, and end up indicting some low-level toady for lying about something stupid and unrelated to the case.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Jun 29, 2017 8:03pm
Dr Winston O'Boogie;1860855 wrote:We shall see.
Yes, the leakers are trying to hurt Trump by leaking bullshit instead of evidence.
Dr Winston O'Boogie
Posts: 1,799
Jun 29, 2017 11:06pm
It's a vast left-wing conspiracy.gut;1860861 wrote:Yes, the leakers are trying to hurt Trump by leaking bullshit instead of evidence.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Jun 30, 2017 1:06am
Well, usually a conspiracy at least has some credible evidence...Dr Winston O'Boogie;1860882 wrote:It's a vast left-wing conspiracy.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jun 30, 2017 1:45am
Ever meet anyone who believes in "chemtrails?"gut;1860886 wrote:Well, usually a conspiracy at least has some credible evidence...
Also, I don't know that Clinton's use of almost the exact same phrase (change "left" to "right" of course) in reference to a "mass right wing conspiracy against [her] husband" had any real credibility beyond the normal childish bickering between the two parties.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Jun 30, 2017 1:50am
Doesn't change anything. Again, EVIDENCE.O-Trap;1860890 wrote:Ever meet anyone who believes in "chemtrails?"
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jun 30, 2017 2:18am
Sorry. What I meant to indicate is that there are plenty of conspiracies that don't really have any "credible evidence," as you put it.gut;1860891 wrote:Doesn't change anything. Again, EVIDENCE.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Jun 30, 2017 4:57am
I got ya.....I should have said "there's never been a meaningful, mainstream conspiracy theory with evidence"O-Trap;1860894 wrote:Sorry. What I meant to indicate is that there are plenty of conspiracies that don't really have any "credible evidence," as you put it.
Dr Winston O'Boogie
Posts: 1,799
Jun 30, 2017 9:05am
Agreed. I was borrowing from Hillary's wonderful theory about he cause of her husband's problems. Trump's crew sounds similar.gut;1860886 wrote:Well, usually a conspiracy at least has some credible evidence...
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Jun 30, 2017 9:34am
No wonder the media wants to talk about Trump’s Twitter
Published on Jun 30, 2017
Project Veritas' newest video from the American Pravda: CNN series exposes Jimmy Carr, the Associate Producer for CNN's New Day attacking President Donald Trump and admitting that CNN has a left-leaning bias.
9 1/2 minute video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dRGMME4VnM
Published on Jun 30, 2017
Project Veritas' newest video from the American Pravda: CNN series exposes Jimmy Carr, the Associate Producer for CNN's New Day attacking President Donald Trump and admitting that CNN has a left-leaning bias.
9 1/2 minute video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dRGMME4VnM
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jun 30, 2017 2:36pm
I doubt all the Republican Congressmen got that memo so quickly.QuakerOats;1860907 wrote:No wonder the media wants to talk about Trump’s Twitter
Published on Jun 30, 2017
Project Veritas' newest video from the American Pravda: CNN series exposes Jimmy Carr, the Associate Producer for CNN's New Day attacking President Donald Trump and admitting that CNN has a left-leaning bias.
9 1/2 minute video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dRGMME4VnM
People want to talk about Trump's tweet because it's him being petulent and sophomoric, which are not qualities one looks for in a President.
Having said that, the video is pretty clear. Anyone who resists the idea that CNN doesn't generally lean left (and has for years) has to be suffering from some sort of cognitive dissonance.
Spock
Posts: 2,853
Jun 30, 2017 3:21pm
Trump is masterfully playing the media. He tweets something utterly ridiculous to change the narrative of the 24 hour media cycle. While the left wing nuthuggers at MSNBC and CNN are hyperfocused on the word "blood" the travel ban and Kates law goes into affect with little to no media coverage that will make them look bad.
the tweets will not be part of the re election campaign 3 years from now but all the legislation that isnt getting bashed in the media will be and they will have more positives than negatives.
Keep showing the media the shiny red objects Donald.......you are winning bigly!
the tweets will not be part of the re election campaign 3 years from now but all the legislation that isnt getting bashed in the media will be and they will have more positives than negatives.
Keep showing the media the shiny red objects Donald.......you are winning bigly!
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Jun 30, 2017 3:27pm
Yep.
another win:
EPA Listens to Manufacturers, Clarifies Water Protections.
Following tireless advocacy from the NAM, the EPA took the first step in a multistep process to clarify the definition of “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS). The proposal would retract the overly broad definition issued by the previous administration. Under the old WOTUS rule, the federal government was given jurisdiction over some of the smallest waterways in the country, jeopardizing manufacturers’ operations and potential expansion. Earlier this year, President Trump signed an executive order to begin the process of returning to a more reasonable standard, and the latest EPA proposal is a positive step forward. The NAM will continue to advocate a new rule that conforms to the Clean Water Act, protects our nation’s waters and provides clarity for manufacturers and landowners around the country.
another win:
EPA Listens to Manufacturers, Clarifies Water Protections.
Following tireless advocacy from the NAM, the EPA took the first step in a multistep process to clarify the definition of “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS). The proposal would retract the overly broad definition issued by the previous administration. Under the old WOTUS rule, the federal government was given jurisdiction over some of the smallest waterways in the country, jeopardizing manufacturers’ operations and potential expansion. Earlier this year, President Trump signed an executive order to begin the process of returning to a more reasonable standard, and the latest EPA proposal is a positive step forward. The NAM will continue to advocate a new rule that conforms to the Clean Water Act, protects our nation’s waters and provides clarity for manufacturers and landowners around the country.
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Jun 30, 2017 4:43pm
Yes, they will be.Spock;1860982 wrote:the tweets will not be part of the re election campaign 3 years from now
Spock
Posts: 2,853
Jun 30, 2017 4:56pm
No they won't. He will have a legislative record, a economic record that will be stout to run on. If the dems run a campaign about a 3 year old tweet they will lose bigly.CenterBHSFan;1861001 wrote:Yes, they will be.
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
Jun 30, 2017 5:44pm
gosh a ruddies, he will have 3 more years of idiotic tweets to add to these, plus all the starving and dead people caused by his policies.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Jun 30, 2017 6:06pm
And people said Trump wasn't going to do anything to fight climate change...isadore;1861011 wrote:g...plus all the starving and dead people
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
Jun 30, 2017 6:54pm
gosh a ruddies, he has so many programs and decisions to destroy people's lives.gut;1861017 wrote:And people said Trump wasn't going to do anything to fight climate change...
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Jun 30, 2017 8:16pm
Kate's Law, Sarah's Law and No Sanctuary For Criminals have all made it through the House. I hope the president has the opportunity to sign these bills into law. It's sad we need new laws to magnify and enforce existing laws.