Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Nov 11, 2016 11:11am
ZWICK 4 PREZ;1823765 wrote:Ah you're right , I apologize.
Accepted; please keep working on the numbers.
ZWICK 4 PREZ
Posts: 7,733
Nov 11, 2016 11:19am
Worked on um. Yup, you're still full of shit!QuakerOats;1823774 wrote:Accepted; please keep working on the numbers.
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Nov 11, 2016 11:38am
I'm sure he's thrilled to know he's in consideration to ride on the small bus.QuakerOats;1823773 wrote:Yes; I have not yet decided whether to let fish82 ride with me ...........but he is certainly in the running.
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Nov 11, 2016 11:47am
Yeah...I'm pretty much a solo act.
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Nov 11, 2016 12:41pm
Not even in office yet and already creating well-paying jobs.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Nov 11, 2016 12:47pm
72k/year to "Stop Trump"
Don't be so fucking gullible.
Don't be so fucking gullible.
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Nov 11, 2016 1:04pm
The people who would sign up are the sorts that are gullible enough to believe they'd actually get $70K to do this.Automatik;1823792 wrote:72k/year to "Stop Trump"
Don't be so fucking gullible.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Nov 11, 2016 1:16pm
You'd think. But one of my [very] liberal colleagues getting angrier by the day was telling me how people are pouring money into the DNC, and Dems are all talking about making Trump a one-term POTUS.Automatik;1823792 wrote:72k/year to "Stop Trump"
Don't be so fucking gullible.
I told him it's nice to know all the whining about "obstruction" wasn't sincere, and at least Repubs waited 18 months from taking that course....you'd think Dems could at least wait until the guy is sworn in.
Spock
Posts: 2,853
Nov 11, 2016 1:24pm
What's funny is that all the money these rich liberals are going to make a lot of money off of trumps stock marketgut;1823795 wrote:You'd think. But one of my [very] liberal colleagues getting angrier by the day was telling me how people are pouring money into the DNC, and Dems are all talking about making Trump a one-term POTUS.
I told him it's nice to know all the whining about "obstruction" wasn't sincere, and at least Repubs waited 18 months from taking that course....you'd think Dems could at least wait until the guy is sworn in.
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Nov 11, 2016 1:24pm
Srsly? Shit man...I totally thought it was legit.Automatik;1823792 wrote:72k/year to "Stop Trump"
Don't be so fucking gullible.
Thanks for clearing that up!
:rolleyes:
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Nov 11, 2016 1:36pm
You're welcome. Always here to help.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Nov 11, 2016 3:28pm
...Con_Alma;1823753 wrote:He was my write in vote again this year.
I really hope he continues his push for his political career.
Really?
I bet there's a registration fee or something.Heretic;1823793 wrote:The people who would sign up are the sorts that are gullible enough to believe they'd actually get $70K to do this.
Some scammers are gonna make BANK off stuff like this.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 11, 2016 3:31pm
Wait your first post was serious? Good god man he was clearly being sarcastic lolAutomatik;1823800 wrote:You're welcome. Always here to help.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Nov 11, 2016 3:40pm
With the way this forum has been going, it's hard to tell sometimes. :laugh:
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Nov 11, 2016 4:24pm
For example, we're four pages into a thread labeled "Disgusted with Trump administration," and the 'Trump administration' hasn't even actually happened yet. I would think we'd be light on material to rail against.Automatik;1823813 wrote:With the way this forum has been going, it's hard to tell sometimes. :laugh:
Not that I think we will be. Comedians got Christmas early this year, when they found out they'd have no shortage of material over the next four years.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Nov 11, 2016 5:11pm
O-Trap;1823826 wrote:For example, we're four pages into a thread labeled "Disgusted with Trump administration," and the 'Trump administration' hasn't even actually happened yet. I would think we'd be light on material to rail against.
Well, then what about the 'Disgusted with Clinton Administration' thread?
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Nov 11, 2016 5:16pm
Equally odd.QuakerOats;1823842 wrote:Well, then what about the 'Disgusted with Clinton Administration' thread?
I'm not closing either of them down.
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Nov 11, 2016 9:11pm
Lol. You actually believe this?jedbartlet02;1823156 wrote:Not if you're LGBTQ, Muslim, or Mexican. Trump is going to fuck them hard
S
superman
Posts: 3,582
Nov 11, 2016 9:35pm
To be fair, gibwok is a retard.ernest_t_bass;1823881 wrote:Lol. You actually believe this?
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
Nov 13, 2016 5:46pm
Well, Steve Bannon as a chief adviser is not a good step Trump.
Reince is not bad, but the fact that Bannon may influence policy is not a good start.
Reince is not bad, but the fact that Bannon may influence policy is not a good start.
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Nov 13, 2016 6:04pm
Reince = Chief of Staff
Bannon = Chief Strategist.
They got him the election and they work well together.
Bannon = Chief Strategist.
They got him the election and they work well together.
S
superman
Posts: 3,582
Nov 13, 2016 6:09pm
Elections have consequences.ptown_trojans_1;1824311 wrote:Well, Steve Bannon as a chief adviser is not a good step Trump.
Reince is not bad, but the fact that Bannon may influence policy is not a good start.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Nov 13, 2016 6:33pm
You mean like Valerie Jarrett bad?ptown_trojans_1;1824311 wrote:Well, Steve Bannon as a chief adviser is not a good step Trump.
Spock
Posts: 2,853
Nov 13, 2016 6:36pm
could you imagine the picks that HC would of made? It would of been worse then Obamaptown_trojans_1;1824311 wrote:Well, Steve Bannon as a chief adviser is not a good step Trump.
Reince is not bad, but the fact that Bannon may influence policy is not a good start.
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Nov 13, 2016 6:39pm
Lol They are polar opposites, aren't they....a black communist to a white nationalist.gut;1824319 wrote:You mean like Valerie Jarrett bad?
Crazy world.