Obamacare is like giving someone a broken down clunker who doesn't even have gas money, and then patting yourself on the back for providing them with a car.iclfan2;1852800 wrote:Intelligence for one. Why would I value people's opinion on if it's a good law or not from people who don't have to pay for anything anyway?
lol, that may be true!ppaw1999;1852792 wrote:LOL Ms. Center. All I can do is picture Quaker Oats head exploding as he listens to the "Trumping the World" podcast.:laugh:
I don't think he's ever stated it beyond perhaps a joking manner. However, if ever a non-political person could be President, he'd get my vote.O-Trap;1852964 wrote:Has Sam Harris actually voiced a desire to run?
I don't know enough of his politics. I've heard him speak, and I read one of his books (where he really didn't sound so level-headed, but that's just one book), but none of it really got into politics THAT much.CenterBHSFan;1852967 wrote:I don't think he's ever stated it beyond perhaps a joking manner. However, if ever a non-political person could be President, he'd get my vote.
Curious, which book? I'm actually reading one of the books that he co-wrote and I find it interesting. Will probably be done wit it tonight (it's not that long at all)O-Trap;1853039 wrote:I don't know enough of his politics. I've heard him speak, and I read one of his books (where he really didn't sound so level-headed, but that's just one book), but none of it really got into politics THAT much.
GOP supports and condones this by their inaction.isadore;1853092 wrote:gosh a ruddies, Donald has gone treasonous or just providing services for his employers
Trump revealed highly classified information to Russian foreign minister and ambassador-Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-revealed-highly-classified-information-to-russian-foreign-minister-and-ambassador/2017/05/15/530c172a-3960-11e7-9e48-c4f199710b69_story.html
Yeah, if you're a smart and more politically conscious billionaire, you HAVE to be annoyed at that notion.gut;1853045 wrote:The sad part is I'm seeing people say Trump demonstrates the outsider/rich guy isn't qualified. I don't think Trump is remotely representative.
I am wondering if Trump ever actually wanted the job - how does a multi-billionaire that close in the polls barely spend any of his own money on the campaign?
I wonder if secretly he wants to be impeached so he can blame the "deep state" for sabotaging him (because his ego won't let him quit).
It was Letter to a Christian Nation. It's been around awhile. What content was there wasn't bad. The book, as a whole, though, was a lot of emotional appeal and ranting. I mean, the title sort of lends itself to that sort of anecdote, so I suppose I should have known better.CenterBHSFan;1853048 wrote:Curious, which book? I'm actually reading one of the books that he co-wrote and I find it interesting. Will probably be done wit it tonight (it's not that long at all)
https://www.amazon.com/Islam-Future-Tolerance-Sam-Harris/dp/0674088700/ref=sr_1_8?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1494872931&sr=1-8&keywords=Sam+Harris
I actually got my first look at Harris while watching TYT. Cenk, being the southbound backside of a mule that he is, was clearly on the offensive immediately which made me curious as to why. So I looked further into Harris, saw him on the Rubin Report, got even more interested, and it went from there. He's everywhere now, really. From his podcast to Joe Rogan.
Every time I see/hear him, I'm more impressed.
Color me shocked and amazed.isadore;1853092 wrote:gosh a ruddies, Donald has gone treasonous or just providing services for his employers
Trump revealed highly classified information to Russian foreign minister and ambassador-Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-revealed-highly-classified-information-to-russian-foreign-minister-and-ambassador/2017/05/15/530c172a-3960-11e7-9e48-c4f199710b69_story.html
This needs said. Seeing someone as the best option doesn't mean you support everything. I voted for Johnson despite not liking plenty of his track record, and I'd be more than okay calling him out on that sort of thing.iclfan2;1853125 wrote:Also it's not treason as the President can declassify anything (not that he should)
And 2, sleeper, no one condones the actions. If he did divulge something he shouldn't have, it is not condoned by any reasonable conservative.
gosh a ruddies, providing information to our enemies, is treason. aid and comforticlfan2;1853125 wrote:Also it's not treason as the President can declassify anything (not that he should)
And 2, sleeper, no one condones the actions. If he did divulge something he shouldn't have, it is not condoned by any reasonable conservative.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
gosh a ruddies there is no exaggerating purposely aiding our enemies like the Donald did.iclfan2;1853148 wrote:Even if everything reported by WAPO is true, it still isn't "treason". Your dumbass exaggeration like other morons in the media is how we got Trump in the first place.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Of course they are going to say it's bullshit. They have zero integrity and have zero credibility when it comes to telling the truth.fish82;1853130 wrote:FWIW, everyone who was in the room has confirmed that the WaPo story is bullshit.
Looking forward to seeing their "sources" testifying before congress about this treasonous act. How soon can we expect that to happen? :laugh:
Yeah, McMaster's credibility is for shit, amirite? :laugh:sleeper;1853163 wrote:Of course they are going to say it's bullshit. They have zero integrity and have zero credibility when it comes to telling the truth.
Good to see you supporting and defending Trump. You own it.
McMaster came out and denied something that the story didn't even mention. McMaster denied that the sources and methods were discussed which isn't even mentioned in the article that talks about specific plot lines. He even used the word "As reported" and danced around calling it outright false because he knows there is a transcript and isn't sure if WaPo has it or not(They claim they do).fish82;1853165 wrote:Yeah, McMaster's credibility is for shit, amirite? :laugh:
Looking forward to to the WaPo "sources" clearing this up during sworn testimony. Again, how soon can we expect that to happen?
I'll ask again. How soon can we expect this story to be confirmed via sworn testimony? Easier still, how soon can we expect the story to be confirmed by subpoena of the meeting transcript? If the story is credible, we can assume that Adam Schiff will be in front of a camera somewhere today demanding it, no?sleeper;1853166 wrote:McMaster came out and denied something that the story didn't even mention. McMaster denied that the sources and methods were discussed which isn't even mentioned in the article that talks about specific plot lines. He even used the word "As reported" and danced around calling it outright false because he knows there is a transcript and isn't sure if WaPo has it or not(They claim they do).
This is a classic narrative control strategy. Way to be bought and sold so easily!